Practical considerations for amino acid isotope analysis

Abstract

Over the last few decades, isotopic analysis of amino acids at the compound- and position-specific levels has been rapidly advancing across diverse fields. As these techniques progress, evaluation of isotopic fractionation associated with sample workup is essential. This critical review of analytical methods through the lens of isotope geochemistry provides a benchmark for researchers across disciplines seeking to make compound- and position-specific amino acid isotope measurements. We focus on preparation, acid hydrolysis, clean-up, derivatization, separation, and C, H, N, and S isotope measurement. Despite substantial customizability across these steps, the following general recommendations should maximize recovery while minimizing isotopic fractionation. Samples should be freeze-dried and stored anoxically at ≤ –20 °C prior to conventional acid hydrolysis (6N HCl, 110 °C, 20–24 h, anoxic), which suffices for many residues. Both gas and liquid chromatographic (GC and LC, respectively) techniques are well-established and separate about 15 amino acids; LC bypasses the need for derivatization, while GC provides higher sensitivity. Furthermore, when derivatization is needed, n-acetyl and alkoxycarbonyl esters provide the most reproducible C isotope ratios. For compound-specific analyses, online GC–IRMS and LC–IRMS systems offer the easiest workflow, but EA–IRMS enables potential multi-element isotope analysis. Emerging techniques like high-resolution mass spectrometry are also promising for multi-element analysis and recover position-specific isotopic information. Looking forward to the next decade of innovation, isotope geochemists and ecologists can improve amino acid isotope analysis by focusing on streamlining multi-element analysis and standardizing calibration practices across laboratories.