Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Siddhartha Krishnamurthy

Publications and source records attributed to Siddhartha Krishnamurthy.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Synthesis Plugin for Auralization of Rotor Self Noise

This paper describes the development and architecture of a software plugin for the NASA Auralization Framework that synthesizes rotor modulating broadband self noise. A conceptual overview of the synthesis process is reviewed. The architecture description includes use of the plugin within a broader framework to auralize rotorcraft flyovers. Use of the plugin is demonstrated for a six-passenger quadrotor urban air mobility reference vehicle design using collective-pitch control.

Self Noise↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Synthesis Plugin for Auralization of Rotor Self Noise

This paper describes the development and architecture of a software plugin for the NASA Auralization Framework that synthesizes rotor modulating broadband self noise. A conceptual overview of the synthesis process is reviewed. The architecture description includes use of the plugin within a broader framework to auralize rotorcraft flyovers. Use of the plugin is demonstrated for a six-passenger quadrotor urban air mobility reference vehicle design using collective-pitch control.

Auralization↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Feasibility Study for Remote Psychoacoustic Testing of Human Response to Urban Air Mobility Vehicle Noise

NASA will remotely administer a psychoacoustic test in late summer of 2022 as the first of two phases of a cooperative Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicle noise human response study. This study relies on the cooperation of multiple government agencies, academia, and industry to assemble a wide range of UAM vehicle sounds. This database of sounds will be used to create a rich database of human response to UAM noise that would be challenging for a single organization to acquire. The development of the remote test method to study human response to aviation noise was prompted by the novel coronavirus pandemic. The feasibility portion of the study described in this work will demonstrate and refine the remote test method for use in the implementation phase. This paper details the method for remotely administering the psychoacoustic test and the sound stimuli to be used in the Feasibility Test. Comparisons of annoyance response data from previous in-person tests will be used to demonstrate the viability of the remote test method. The paper also describes an effort to determine if providing a contextual cue to test subjects influences the annoyance response.

UAM Vehicle Noise Human Response Study↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Feasibility study for remote psychoacoustic testing of human response to urban air mobility vehicle noise

NASA will remotely administer a psychoacoustic test in late summer of 2022 as the first of two phases of a cooperative Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicle noise human response study. This study relies on the cooperation of multiple government agencies, academia, and industry to assemble a wide range of UAM vehicle sounds. This database of sounds will be used to create a rich database of human response to UAM noise that would be challenging for a single organization to acquire. The development of the remote test method to study human response to aviation noise was prompted by the novel coronavirus pandemic. The feasibility portion of the study described in this work will demonstrate and refine the remote test method for use in the implementation phase. This paper details the method for remotely administering the psychoacoustic test and the sound stimuli to be used in the Feasibility Test. Comparisons of annoyance response data from previous in-person tests will be used to demonstrate the viability of the remote test method. The paper also describes an effort to determine if providing a contextual cue to test subjects influences the annoyance response.

Remote psychoacoustic test↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Remotely Administered Psychoacoustic Test for sUAS Noise to Gauge Feasibility of Remote UAM Noise Study

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) remotely administered a psychoacoustic test in fall of 2022 as the first of two phases of a cooperative Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicle noise human response study. The first phase, the Feasibility Test, described in this paper, determined the feasibility of the remote test method, in contrast to a previous in-person psychoacoustic test that found an annoyance response difference between small unmanned aerial system (sUAS) noise and ground vehicle noise. This paper discusses the Feasibility Test online layout, sound calibration method, remote test software development, stimuli selection, test subject recruitment, and test administration. Test performance is measured through comparison of annoyance response data with the previous in-person test results. The paper also investigates if providing a contextual cue to test subjects influenced their annoyance response. Response differences between test subjects in geographically distinct areas are analyzed. Administrative challenges that were encountered during the test are discussed. The second phase of this study, the implementation phase, will use a remote (web-based) test method and leverage the cooperation of multiple government agencies, academia, and industry to gain human response insights from a wide range of UAM vehicle sounds that would be challenging for a single organization to acquire. Improvements to administering a remote test for the implementation phase of the UAM vehicle noise human response study are recommended.

Remote Psychoacoustic Test↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Remotely Administered Psychoacoustic Test for sUAS Noise to Gauge Feasibility of Remote UAM Noise Study

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) remotely administered a psychoacoustic test in fall of 2022 as the first of two phases of a cooperative Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicle noise human response study. The first phase, the Feasibility Test, described in this paper, determined the feasibility of the remote test method, in contrast to a previous in-person psychoacoustic test that found an annoyance response difference between small unmanned aerial system (sUAS) noise and ground vehicle noise. This paper discusses the Feasibility Test online layout, sound calibration method, remote test software development, stimuli selection, test subject recruitment, and test administration. Test performance is measured through comparison of annoyance response data with the previous in-person test results. The paper also investigates if providing a contextual cue to test subjects influenced their annoyance response. Response differences between test subjects in geographically distinct areas are analyzed. Administrative challenges that were encountered during the test are discussed. The second phase of this study, the implementation phase, will use a remote (web-based) test method and leverage the cooperation of multiple government agencies, academia, and industry to gain human response insights from a wide range of UAM vehicle sounds that would be challenging for a single organization to acquire. Improvements to administering a remote test for the implementation phase of the UAM vehicle noise human response study are recommended.

Remote Psychoacoustic Test↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Psychoacoustic Test for Urban Air Mobility Vehicle Sound Quality

This paper describes a psychoacoustic test in the Exterior Effects Room (EER) at the NASA Langley Research Center. The test investigated the degree to which sound quality metrics (sharpness, tonality, etc.) are predictive of annoyance to notional sounds of Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicles (i.e., air taxis). A suite of 136 unique (4.6 second duration) UAM rotor noise stimuli was generated. These stimuli were based on aeroacoustic predictions of a NASA reference UAM quadrotor aircraft under two flight conditions. The synthesizer changed rotor noise parameters such as the blade passage frequency, the relative level of broadband self-noise, and the relative level of tonal motor noise. With loudness constant, the synthesis parameters impacted sound quality in a way that created a spread of predictors both in synthesizer parameters and in sound quality metrics. Forty subjects listened to the suite of UAM noise stimuli in the EER and judged each sound individually on a standard scale of annoyance. Additionally, a subset of the UAM noise stimuli were compared to a reference sound that varied in loudness. From these responses, the relative effect of changes in loudness or changes in other sound quality metrics on annoyance was evaluated. This paper covers background and motivation for the test, details of how the sound stimuli were generated, and details of the test design and execution. Test results investigate how sound quality may affect perceived annoyance to UAM vehicle noise, indicating the importance of sharpness, tonality, impulsiveness, and roughness on annoyance to UAM noise.

UAM↗