Van Zante, Judith F. | Search NASA

NASA NTRS2019

Nasa Glenn Icing Research Tunnel: 2018 Change in Drop-Sizing Equations Due to Change in Cloud Droplet Probe Sample Area

Although there has been no physical change to the cloud drop diameters in the NASA Glenn Icing Research Tunnel (IRT), the IRT cloud calibration team now has an improved understanding of the facility’s drop-sizing instrumentation, which has resulted in a recent change to the drop-sizing equations. Only the calculated values given in the previous calibration report have changed. In 2017, IRT staff found reason to believe that since at least 2014, the sample area for its Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP) (Droplet Measurement Technologies, Inc.) has been closer to 0.289 mm2, rather than the user manual’s suggested value of 0.24 mm2. In September 2017, the probe’s sample area was measured both before and after the probe was realigned, and the end sample area was measured to be 0.248 mm2. Following the probe’s realignment, drop size measurements were made in the IRT using the CDP as well as optical array probes OAP–230X and OAP–230Y (Particle Measurement Systems, Inc.). These measurements suggested that 0.289 mm2 was the more accurate value for historical measurements. When the CDP sample area used for calculations was changed from 0.24 to 0.289 mm2, distributions previously reported to have a median volumetric diameter (MVD) between 30 and 100 μm were instead calculated to have MVD values 10 to 18 percent higher. The analyses that led to these conclusions are reported in this paper, as well as the new drop-sizing equations that have been developed for the corrected measurement values. This report contains updates to drop-sizing data for the IRT’s “normal” operating conditions (MVD < 50 μm) and discusses the effects on the IRT’s “large-drop” conditions (Mod1 nozzles, Pair < 10 psig), but it does not include updates to the drop-sizing equations for those large-drop conditions.

Particle sizing↗

NASA NTRS2019

The Demonstration of a Light Extinction Tomography System at the NASA Glenn Research Center's Icing Research Tunnel

A prototype light extinction tomography system has been developed for acquiring real-time in-situ icing cloud uniformity and density measurements in the NASA Glenn Research Center's Icing Research Tunnel (IRT). These measurements are currently obtained through periodic manual calibrations of the IRT. These calibrations are time consuming and assume that cloud uniformity and density does not greatly vary between the periodic calibrations. It is envisioned that the new light extinction tomography system will provide the means to make these measurements in-situ in real-time and minimize the need for these manual calibrations. This new system uses the principle of light extinction tomography to measure the spray density and distribution in the test section. The prototype system was installed and successfully demonstrated in the Icing Research Tunnel in early 2018. Data sets were acquired for several standard spray and simulated fault conditions to assess system capability and sensitivity. This paper will describe the prototype light extinction system, the theory behind it, and the results of the demonstration test that was conducted in the IRT.

Test Facility↗

NASA NTRS2019

The Demonstration of a Light Extinction Tomography System at the NASA Glenn Research Center's Icing Research Tunnel

A prototype light extinction tomography system has been developed for acquiring real-time in-situ icing cloud uniformity and density measurements in the NASA Glenn Research Center's Icing Research Tunnel (IRT). These measurements are currently obtained through periodic manual calibrations of the IRT. These calibrations are time consuming and assume that cloud uniformity and density does not greatly vary between the periodic calibrations. It is envisioned that the new light extinction tomography system will provide the means to make these measurements in-situ in real-time and minimize the need for these manual calibrations. This new system uses the principle of light extinction tomography to measure the spray density and distribution in the test section. The prototype system was installed and successfully demonstrated in the Icing Research Tunnel in early 2018. Data sets were acquired for several standard spray and simulated fault conditions to assess system capability and sensitivity. This paper will describe the prototype light extinction system, the theory behind it, and the results of the demonstration test that was conducted in the IRT.

Tomography↗

NASA NTRS2019

Airframe and Engine Icing

This is both a presented version of NASA's in-flight icing training aids, and a brief discussion of NASA Glenn's two icing-capable facilities that simulate the airframe and engine icing environments. This presentation has been adapted for a Kent State University Aviation Safety Day. The original version was developed in 2006 time frame, and has been presented to both pilots and engineers.

pilot↗

NASA NTRS2019

Particle Size Calibration Testing in the NASA Propulsion Systems Laboratory

The particle size characterization portion of the 2017 Propulsion Systems Laboratory (PSL) Cloud Calibration is described. The work focuses on characterizing the particle size distribution of the icing cloud as a function of simulated atmospheric conditions.These results will aid in upcoming ice crystal and supercooled liquid icing tests in PSL. Measurements acquired with the Phase Doppler Interferometer and High Speed Imaging instruments are presented. Experimental results indicate that the particle size distribution is primarily a function nozzle air and water pressures, and that air speed is not a significant effect for ice crystal clouds in PSL and both thermodynamic conditions and air speed are not significant effects for supercooled liquid water clouds in PSL.

Engine Icing↗

NASA NTRS2018

Ground & In-Flight Icing

This presentation is intended for General Aviation pilots. It describes the basics of ground and in-flight icing, and offers tools to: avoid icing encounters, quickly detect and exit icing conditions, and how to do so as safely as possible.

Pilot Training Aid↗

NASA NTRS2018

Particle Size Calibration Testing in the NASA Propulsion Systems Laboratory

The particle size characterization portion of the 2017 Propulsion Systems Laboratory (PSL) Cloud Calibration is described. The work focuses on characterizing the particle size distribution of the icing cloud as a function of simulated atmospheric conditions.These results will aid in upcoming ice crystal and supercooled liquid icing tests in PSL. Measurements acquired with the Phase Doppler Interferometer and High Speed Imaging instruments are presented. Experimental results indicate that the particle size distribution is primarily a function nozzle air and water pressures, and that air speed is not a significant effect for ice crystal clouds in PSL and both thermodynamic conditions and air speed are not significant effects for supercooled liquid water clouds in PSL.

Engine icing↗

NASA NTRS2018

Update on the NASA Glenn Propulsion Systems Lab Icing and Ice Crystal Cloud Characterization (2017)

NASA Glenn's Propulsion Systems Lab, an altitude engine test facility, generates icing clouds with a spray system. While the spray system is used mostly to create ice crystal clouds (Appendix D/P), the 2017 cloud characterization effort added the requirement to produce exactly supercooled liquid clouds in Appendix C and Appendix O. Success was demonstrated to supercool the largest drops at the warmest conditions, but not freeze out the smallest drops at the coldest conditions. This paper documents primarily the total water content characterization methodology and results from an Iso-Kinetic Probe in ice crystals and Multi-Wire sensor in supercooled liquid, along with the cloud uniformity provided by light extinction tomography. Particle size distribution results from High Speed Imaging probes and a Phase Doppler Interferometer are discussed. Also, a new numerical model for tracking the thermodynamics of the air-drop interactions in PSL from the plenum toward the cloud characterization plane are noted. Both of these latter topic are more fully documented in companion papers.

Calibration↗

NASA NTRS2017

Numerical Analysis of Mixed-Phase Icing Cloud Simulations in the NASA Propulsion Systems Laboratory

This paper describes the development of a numerical model that couples the thermal interaction between ice particles, water droplets, and the flowing gas of an icing wind tunnel for simulation of NASA Glenn Research Centers Propulsion Systems Laboratory (PSL). The ultimate goal of the model is to better understand the complex interactions between the test parameters and have greater confidence in the conditions at the test section of the PSL tunnel. The model attempts to explain the observed changes in test conditions by coupling the conservation of mass and energy equations for both the cloud particles and flowing gas mass. Model predictions were compared to measurements taken during May 2015 testing at PSL, where test conditions varied gas temperature, pressure, velocity and humidity levels, as well as the cloud total water content, particle initial temperature, and particle size distribution.

NASA PSL↗

NASA NTRS2016

An Assessment of the Icing Blade and the SEA Multi-Element Sensor for Liquid Water Content Calibration of the NASA GRC Icing Research Tunnel

The Icing Research Tunnel at NASA Glenn has recently switched from using the Icing Blade to using the SEA Multi-Element Sensor (also known as the multi-wire) for its calibration of cloud liquid water content. In order to peform this transition, tests were completed to compare the Multi-Element Sensor to the Icing Blade, particularly with respect to liquid water content, airspeed, and drop size. The two instruments were found to compare well for the majority of Appendix C conditions. However, it was discovered that the Icing Blade under-measures when the conditions approach the Ludlam Limit. This paper also describes data processing procedures for the Multi-Element Sensor in the IRT, including collision efficiency corrections, mounting underneath a splitter plate, and correcting for a jump in the compensation wire power. Further data is presented to describe the repeatability of the IRT with the Multi-Element Sensor, health-monitoring checks for the instrument, and a sensing-element configuration comparison. Ultimately these tests showed that in the IRT, the multi-wire is a better instrument for measuring cloud liquid water content than the blade.

aircraft icing↗

NASA NTRS2016

Update on the NASA Glenn Propulsion Systems Lab Ice Crystal Cloud Characterization (2015)

NASA Glenn's Propulsion Systems Lab (PSL), an altitude engine test facility, was outfitted with a spray system to generate ice crystals. The first ice crystal characterization test occurred in 2012. At PSL, turbine engines and driven rigs can experience ice crystal icing at flight altitudes, temperatures and Mach numbers. To support these tests, four ice crystal characterizations have been conducted in two different facility configurations. In addition, super-cooled liquid and mixed phase clouds have also been generated. This paper will discuss the recent learning from the previous two calibrations. It will describe some of the 12-parameter calibration space, and how those parameters interact with each other, the instrumentation used to characterize the cloud and present a sample of the cloud characterization results.

Ice Clouds↗

NASA NTRS2015

An Assessment of the SEA Multi-Element Sensor for Liquid Water Content Calibration of the NASA GRC Icing Research Tunnel

The NASA Glenn Icing Research tunnel has been using an Icing Blade technique to measure cloud liquid water content (LWC) since 1980. The IRT conducted tests with SEA Multi-Element sensors from 2009 to 2011 to assess their performance in measuring LWC. These tests revealed that the Multi-Element sensors showed some significant advantages over the Icing Blade, particularly at higher water contents, higher impingement rates, and large drop sizes. Results of these and other tests are presented here.

multi-wire↗

NASA NTRS2015

NASA Glenn Propulsion Systems Lab: Update on Calibration Testing

No abstract available

ice crystals↗

NASA NTRS2015

NASA Glenn Icing Research Tunnel: 2014 and 2015 Cloud Calibration Procedures and Results

This report summarizes the current status of the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) Icing Research Tunnel cloud calibration: specifically, the cloud uniformity, liquid water content, and drop-size calibration results from both the January-February 2014 full cloud calibration and the January 2015 interim cloud calibration. Some aspects of the cloud have remained the same as what was reported for the 2014 full calibration, including the cloud uniformity from the Standard nozzles, the drop-size equations for Standard and Mod1 nozzles, and the liquid water content for large-drop conditions. Overall, the tests performed in January 2015 showed good repeatability to 2014, but there is new information to report as well. There have been minor updates to the Mod1 cloud uniformity on the north side of the test section. Also, successful testing with the OAP-230Y has allowed the IRT to re-expand its operating envelopes for large-drop conditions to a maximum median volumetric diameter of 270 microns. Lastly, improvements to the collection-efficiency correction for the SEA multi-wire have resulted in new calibration equations for Standard- and Mod1-nozzle liquid water content.

aircraft icing↗

NASA NTRS2014

NASA Glenn Icing Research Tunnel: 2014 Cloud Calibration Procedure and Results

The results of the December 2013 to February 2014 Icing Research Tunnel full icing cloud calibration are presented. The calibration steps included establishing a uniform cloud and conducting drop size and liquid water content calibrations. The goal of the calibration was to develop a uniform cloud, and to generate a transfer function from the inputs of air speed, spray bar atomizing air pressure and water pressure to the outputs of median volumetric drop diameter and liquid water content. This was done for both 14 CFR Parts 25 and 29, Appendix C ('typical' icing) and soon-to-be released Appendix O (supercooled large drop) conditions.

liquid water content↗

NASA NTRS2013

Advanced Optical Diagnostics for Ice Crystal Cloud Measurements in the NASA Glenn Propulsion Systems Laboratory

A light extinction tomography technique has been developed to monitor ice water clouds upstream of a direct connected engine in the Propulsion Systems Laboratory (PSL) at NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC). The system consists of 60 laser diodes with sheet generating optics and 120 detectors mounted around a 36-inch diameter ring. The sources are pulsed sequentially while the detectors acquire line-of-sight extinction data for each laser pulse. Using computed tomography algorithms, the extinction data are analyzed to produce a plot of the relative water content in the measurement plane. To target the low-spatial-frequency nature of ice water clouds, unique tomography algorithms were developed using filtered back-projection methods and direct inversion methods that use Gaussian basis functions. With the availability of a priori knowledge of the mean droplet size and the total water content at some point in the measurement plane, the tomography system can provide near real-time in-situ quantitative full-field total water content data at a measurement plane approximately 5 feet upstream of the engine inlet. Results from ice crystal clouds in the PSL are presented. In addition to the optical tomography technique, laser sheet imaging has also been applied in the PSL to provide planar ice cloud uniformity and relative water content data during facility calibration before the tomography system was available and also as validation data for the tomography system. A comparison between the laser sheet system and light extinction tomography resulting data are also presented. Very good agreement of imaged intensity and water content is demonstrated for both techniques. Also, comparative studies between the two techniques show excellent agreement in calculation of bulk total water content averaged over the center of the pipe.

Bencic, Timothy J.↗