Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Vetter, Jeff

Publications and source records attributed to Vetter, Jeff.

ASCR@40: Highlights and Impacts of ASCR’s Programs

A report compiled by the ASCAC Subcommittee on the 40-year history of ASCR for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research. The Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) sits within the Office of Science in the Department of Energy (DOE). Per their web pages, “the mission of the ASCR program is to discover, develop, and deploy computational and networking capabilities to analyze, model, simulate, and predict complex phenomena important to the DOE.” This succinct statement encompasses a wide range of responsibilities for computing and networking facilities; for procuring, deploying, and operating high performance computing, networking, and storage resources; for basic research in mathematics and computer science; for developing and sustaining a large body of software; and for partnering with organizations across the Office of Science and beyond. While its mission statement may seem very contemporary, the roots of ASCR are quite deep—long predating the creation of DOE. Applied mathematics and advanced computing were both elements of the Theoretical Division of the Manhattan Project. In the early 1950s, the Manhattan Project scientist and mathematician John von Neumann, then a commissioner for the AEC (Atomic Energy Commission), advocated for the creation of a Mathematics program to support the continued development and applications of digital computing. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) scientist John Pasta created such a program to fund researchers at universities and AEC laboratories. Under several organizational name changes, this program has persisted ever since, and would eventually grow to become ASCR.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Hardware Evaluation: Abstract Machine Models and Proxy Architectures for Exascale Computing

The strategic and economic impacts of high performance computing (HPC) systems, over the last several decades, have enabled dramatic improvements in manufacturing, design, development, and research, across almost every sector of the U.S. economy, including genetic analysis for agriculture and medicine, oil exploration, electronics, aircraft, and automotive design, and of course national defense technologies. HPC has repeatedly compounded reductions in time-to-solution and time-to-market in each of these areas. In recognition of these strategic and economic impacts, the Department of Energy (DOE) created the Exascale Computing Project (ECP) as a broad-based technology project focusing on simultaneously co-evolving high-performance computing architecture, system software, and application software. While many details of the exascale architectures are undefined, communicating the form and direction of this co-evolution of advances, in each of these three components, across the project, presents a need for a common language through which these advances can be shared. In this document we present a series of abstract representations designed to allow application developers to focus on the aspects of the machine that are important or relevant to performance and code structure. These abstract machine models (AMMs) describe the proposed architectures at the component and system level and are intended as communication aids between application developers and hardware architects during the co-design process. In addition to providing a common language for communication, the constraints of protecting the intellectual property of ECP’s vendor partners requires that the architectural advances be presented in an abstract sense, rather than exposing the specifics of an individual vendor’s designs, while still providing enough detail such that application developers will be able to reason about the performance trade-offs in the design space of their applications.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗