Minimization versus homotopy algorithms

Abstract

The relative merits and demerits of the minimization techniques are assessed using globally convergent quasi-Newton algorithms on the one hand and the homotopy algorithms on the other hand for the solution of problems of nonlinear structural analysis. Like the homotopy algorithms, the globally convergent quasi-Newton algorithms are equally suited for the solution of the nonlinear equations of structural analysis directly without having to pose the problem as an equivalent minimization problem. In the close neighborhood of the limit and bifurcation points quasi-Newton algorithms experience difficulties. Homotopy algorithms are robust for practically all types of nonlinear problems but are computationally not as cost effective since they provide an extremely accurate prediction of the response by calculating it as a large number of points. Globally convergent algorithms can perform well with very approximate Hessians, while homotopy algorithms require extremely accurate Hessians. While quasi-Newton algorithms can be very easily structured to exploit sparsity and symmetry, homotopy algorithms are not presently so structured and would require special modifications for exploitation of such features without sacrificing robustness and global convergence.