Systems/operations technology

Abstract

The deliberations of the Systems/Operations Technology Panel are summarized. The first real question that arose was to develop an understanding of what systems/operations technology is. A relativelynew discipline in the NASA technology organization, necessitates the definition of the objectives. Two objectives were established: (1) to make new things possible, and (2) to make existing capabilities cost less or work better. Making new things possible is not really applicable in the case of a space station. Both Salyut 7 and Skylab indicate that space stations are possible with existing (not necessarily new) technology. There was a concern on the part of some of the penelists that work better might mean higher performance, and that is not necessarily the case at all. Work better may mean simply to provide better service to the users of the space station at lower cost. The panel felt this to be a more realistic viewpoint. As evidenced from interaction with users (and all of the contractors found this basically to be true), the users want low cost, no schedule constraints, and no hassles.