High-Lift CFD Validation

Abstract

It is not unusual when comparing CFD data to experimental data to find discrepancies between the results. Sometimes forces and moments compare well, while surface pressures do not, and vice versa. It is commonplace for the researcher to believe that the flow field has been accurately simulated when these types of measurements compare well. However, being able to routinely predict boundary layer transition and separated flows are not guaranteed. In fact accurate simulation of these types of flow physics has been a challenge to the CFD community. In order to improve Navier-Stokes predictions for complex vortical flow fields, more detailed information about the flow physics is necessary. Unfortunately, the many wind-tunnel tests performed in Langley's NTF and 14x22 facilities as well as in the Ames' 12 ft. Tunnel provided little information about the detailed flow physics, and no priority was given to obtaining any CFD measurements. Using the latest experimental techniques, this information can and should be obtained for present and future use.