Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20150018427

Alternate Protocol for Detecting Biological Contamination on Sensitive Hardware

Berlin, David·Lalime, Erin·Carosso, Nancy
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The purpose of this project is to develop a sterile water based rapid bioburden test. Contamination engineers use two tests to assess the level of biological contamination on hardware: the rapid five minute bioburden test, which is a molecular screening for Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), a molecule found in all cells on the hardware, and a slower colony growth test, which is used to give a more accurate representation of the amount of microbes on the hardware. However, the rapid bioburden test has limited application because it leaves a residue that can be detrimental to sensitive hardware. This can cause project delays while waiting for the results from the three day colony growth test. We address this problem by adapting the commercial germicide based ATP system to a sterile water based system. The test works by reacting ATP with D-Luciferin and Luciferase protein to yield light. The light is then detected by a luminometer that outputs a Relative Light Unit (RLU) amount depending on how much ATP is present. To analyze the effectiveness of the new test, we developed a correlation between amounts of ATP and the RLU produced using the germicide based system. From these experiments, we've generated a consistent relationship between the two in the form of a power curve. From there, we developed a correlation curve between the amount of colonies and the RLU they produced. Initial tests of the new protocol have shown that the water based system isn't as sensitive as the germicide based test.

Explore related subjects

planetary protectioncontamination controlbioburden

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Berlin, David, Lalime, Erin, Carosso, Nancy. 2015-10-29. Alternate Protocol for Detecting Biological Contamination on Sensitive Hardware. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150018427

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2018

EVA Swab Tool to Support Planetary Protection and Astrobiology Evaluations

When we send humans to search for life on other planets, we'll need to know what we brought with us versus what may already be there. To ensure our crewed systems meet planetary protection requirements?and to protect our science from human contamination?we'll need to assess whether microorganisms may be leaking or venting from our spacecraft. Microbial sample collection outside of a pressurized spacecraft is complicated by temperature extremes, low pressures that preclude the use of laboratory standard (wetted) swabs, and operation either in bulky spacesuits or with robotic assistance. A team at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) recently developed a swab kit for use in collecting microbial samples from the external surfaces of crewed spacecraft, including spacesuits. The Extravehicular Activity (EVA) Swab Kit consists of a single swab tool handle and an eight-canister sample caddy. The design team minimized development cost by re-purposing a heritage Space Shuttle tile repair handle that was designed to quickly snap into different tool attachments by engaging a mating device in each end effector. This allowed the tool handle to snap onto a fresh swab end effector much like popular shaving razor handles can snap onto a disposable blade cartridge. To disengage the handle from a swab, the user performs two independent functions, which can be done with a single hand. This dual operation mitigates the risk that a swab will be inadvertently released and lost in microgravity. Each swab end effector is fitted with commercially available foam swab tips, vendor-certified to be sterile for Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA). A microbial filter installed in the bottom of each sample container allows the container to outgas and re-pressurize without introducing microbial contaminants to internal void spaces. Extensive ground testing, post-test handling, and sample analysis confirmed the design is able to maintain sterile conditions as the canister moves between various pressure environments. To further minimize cost, the design team acquired extensive ground test experience in a relevant flight environment by piggy-backing onto suited crew training runs. These training runs allowed the project to validate tool interfaces with pressurized EVA gloves and collect user feedback on the tool design and function, as well as characterize baseline microbial data for different types of spacesuits. In general, test subjects found the EVA Swab Kit relatively straightforward to operate, but identified a number of design improvements that will be incorporated into the final design. Although originally intended to help characterize human forward contaminants, this tool has other potential applications, such as for collecting and preserving space-exposed materials to support astrobiology experiments.

planetary protection↗
NASA NTRS2017

Center Innovation Fund: JSC CIF Characterize Human Forward Contamination

Let's face it: wherever we go, we will inevitably carry along the little critters that live in and on us. Conventional wisdom has long held that it's unlikely those critters could survive the space environment, but in 2007 microscopic animals called Tardigrades survived exposure to space and in 2008 Cyanobacteria lived for 548 days outside the International Space Station (ISS). But what about the organisms we might reasonably expect a crewed spacecraft to leak or vent? Do we even know what they are? How long might our tiny hitch-hikers survive in close proximity to a warm spacecraft that periodically leaks/vents water or oxygen-and how might they mutate with long-duration exposure? Unlike the Mars rovers that we cleaned once and sent on their way, crew members will provide a constantly regenerating contaminant source. Are we prepared to certify that we can meet forward contamination protocols as we search for life at new destinations?

planetary protection↗