Investigating the Feedback Path in a Jet-Surface Resonant Interaction

Zaman, Khairul; Fagan, Amy; Bridges, James; Brown, Cliff

Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20160000206

Investigating the Feedback Path in a Jet-Surface Resonant Interaction

Zaman, Khairul·Fagan, Amy·Bridges, James·Brown, Cliff

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A resonant interaction between an 8:1 aspect ratio rectangular jet and flat-plates, placed parallel to the jet, is addressed in this study. For certain relative locations of the plates, the resonance takes place with accompanying audible tones. Even when the tone is not audible the sound pressure level spectra is often marked by conspicuous peaks. The frequencies of the spectral peaks, as functions of the streamwise length of the plate and its relative location to the jet as well as the jet Mach number, are explored in an effort of understand the flow mechanism. It is demonstrated that the tones are not due to a simple feedback between the plates trailing edge and the nozzle exit; the leading edge also comes into play in determining the frequency. An acoustic feedback path, involving diffraction from the leading edge, appears to explain the frequencies of some of the spectral peaks.

Explore related subjects

Jet Noise Turbulence Resonance

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Zaman, Khairul, Fagan, Amy, Bridges, James, Brown, Cliff. 2015-11-20. Investigating the Feedback Path in a Jet-Surface Resonant Interaction. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160000206

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2021

Characterization of Chevron Nozzle Performance

The flow fields from a set of 50.8 mm diameter circular nozzles were characterized using both streamwise and cross-stream 3-component Stereo Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV). The test matrix of nozzles included 15 different chevron nozzle designs and one baseline, circularly symmetric nozzle. Nozzle jet operating conditions ranged from acoustic Mach numbers of 0.9 to 1.5, with static temperature ratios ranging between 0.84 and 2.7. Detailed surveys of the single jet flows were performed to capture three-dimensional features of the turbulent exhaust jet evolution. Cross-flow planar measurements were obtained at twelve axial locations, ranging from 0.1 to 20 nozzle diameters downstream of the nozzle exit planes. Streamwise measurements, along the jet centerlines, were obtained at ten partially overlapping downstream locations, providing complete axial surveys over a region extending beyond 20 nozzle diameters downstream of the nozzle exit planes. In both optical configurations, the measurement planes were sized to completely capture the fully turbulent jet shear layer growth. The measured three-dimensional mean and turbulent velocity fields, along with computed second order statistics including axial vorticity and turbulent kinetic energy, were evaluated for all test points. Well-defined streamwise vortex structures in the jet shear layers were measured and reported.

Jet Noise↗

NASA NTRS2021

A History of Jet Noise Research at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

This paper reviews jet noise research conducted at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) from the early 1950s to the present day. Research conducted by NASA’s predecessor, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), and early years of NASA focused on turbojet noise, where a common approach for reducing jet noise was to limit the jet exit velocity to speeds that provided acceptable noise levels. Suppressors tested during this time resulted in thrust losses that were too severe to be implemented. With the introduction of turbofan engines in the 1960s, NASA shifted research to programs for both subsonic and supersonic aircraft applications with specific noise reduction goals. Subsonic research focused on increasing the bypass ratio of the engine to reduce the jet exit velocity of the core exhaust and adding mixers to the dual exhaust streams. Advances in computational methods improved aerodynamic designs and jet noise prediction tools. Supersonic applications proved to be more troublesome as programs aimed at large commercial transports required higher specific thrust engines. Changing the engine cycle to reduce jet noise was not compatible with mission range and speed requirements. Research for supersonic commercial aircraft remains an area of interest today at NASA.

Jet Noise↗

NASA NTRS2020

User's Guide for GAA_JET_FV (v1): A Jet Noise Prediction Code Based on the Generalized Acoustic Analogy

This document is a user’s guide for the jet noise prediction code GAA_JET_FV, which can be used to make predictions of turbulent mixing noise in high-speed free jets (ie. in the absence of any solid surfaces) of arbitrary cross section. The code requires a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solution for the mean flow and turbulence as input. A script is provided in the code package which can be used to interpolate structured or unstructured RANS solutions onto a structured grid suitable for the noise calculations. Output file formats for two commonly used RANS solvers are currently supported by this script. The document describes how the code can be obtained and installed on a user’s system. A simple test case is provided that can be run with minimal user knowledge of the code details. General instructions for running the interpolation script and the main code are given along with descriptions of the input and output data files and individual code modules. Several additional test cases are provided which allow the user to exercise additional features of the code. This document is Version 1, Revision 0 of the User’s Guide, which contains examples of round and non-axisymmetric unheated jet test cases. Future versions are planned which will include additional functionality for the code and more complex test cases.

Jet Noise↗