Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20160012025

Gpm Level 1 Science Requirements: Science and Performance Viewed from the Ground

Petersen, W.·Kirstetter, P.·Wolff, D.·Kidd, C.·Tokay, A.·Chandrasekar, V.·Grecu, M.·Huffman, G.·Jackson, G. S.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

GPM meets Level 1 science requirements for rain estimation based on the strong performance of its radar algorithms. Changes in the V5 GPROF algorithm should correct errors in V4 and will likely resolve GPROF performance issues relative to L1 requirements. L1 FOV Snow detection largely verified but at unknown SWE rate threshold (likely < 0.5 –1 mm/hr/liquid equivalent). Ongoing work to improve SWE rate estimation for both satellite and GV remote sensing.

Explore related subjects

PrecipitationValidationHydrology

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Petersen, W., Kirstetter, P., Wolff, D., Kidd, C., Tokay, A., Chandrasekar, V., Grecu, M., Huffman, G., Jackson, G. S.. 2016-10-03. Gpm Level 1 Science Requirements: Science and Performance Viewed from the Ground. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160012025

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2022

How Well do Multisatellite Products Capture the Space-Time Dynamics of Precipitation? Part II: Building an Error Model Through Spectral System Identification

Satellite precipitation products, as all quantitative estimates, come with some inherent degree of uncertainty. To associate a quantitative value of the uncertainty to each individual estimate, error modeling is necessary. Most of the error models proposed so far compute the uncertainty as a function of precipitation intensity only, and only at one specific spatio-temporal scale. We propose a spectral error model which accounts for the neighboring space-time dynamics of precipitation into the uncertainty quantification. Systematic distortions of the precipitation signal and random errors are characterized distinctively in every frequency-wavenumber band in the Fourier domain, to accurately characterize error across scales. The systematic distortions are represented as a deterministic space-time linear filtering term. The random errors are represented as a non-stationary additive noise. The spectral error model is applied to the IMERG multi satellite precipitation product and its parameters are estimated empirically through a system identification approach using the GV-MRMS gauge-radar measurements as reference (“truth”) over the eastern United States. The filtering term is found to be essentially low-pass. While traditional error models attribute most of the error variance to random errors, it is found here that the systematic filtering term explains 48% of the error variance at the native resolution of IMERG. This fact confirms that, at high resolution, filtering effects in satellite precipitation products cannot be ignored, and that the error cannot be represented as a purely random additive or multiplicative term. An important consequence is that precipitation estimates derived from totally different sources shall not be expected to automatically have statistically independent errors.

Precipitation↗
NASA NTRS2022

Satellite Precipitation Measurements: What Have We Learnt About Cloud-Precipitation Processes From Space?

Precipitation is one of the fundamental elements that define global and regional climatology. Precipitation systems consist of a broad spectrum of three-dimensional structures in which microphysical processes interact with macro-scale processes in the cloud system and the ambient environment that prescribe the evolution of the system. Since 1970s, satellite observations of precipitation have been a fundamental tool in quantifying this complex interaction. They have first quantified the frequency and intensity of global precipitation, including remote areas over open oceans and polar regions, thus providing today’s precipitation climatology. More recently, satellite observations of cloud and precipitation have been exploited for understanding the physical mechanisms governing precipitation systems. A subset of these studies also provided observation-based metrics to probe physical processes operating in cloud-precipitation systems and to apply them as diagnostic measures for evaluating the representation of the processes in numerical models for better projections of future climate. In this chapter, we first review the theoretical basis of precipitation remote sensing from space and describe how it is practically applied in satellite missions. In the first part of the chapter, an historical overview of the satellite missions is described, summarising the instruments and retrieval algorithms developed in the missions. In the second part, we introduce a set of studies discussing the fundamental mechanisms behind precipitation formation, highlighting what we have learnt to date on cloud-precipitation processes from satellite observations.

Precipitation↗
NASA NTRS2022

A Global Evaluation of IMERG Precipitation Occurrence Using SMAP Detected Soil Moisture Change

A globally consistent ground validation method for remotely sensed precipitation products is crucial for building confidence in these products. This study develops a new methodology to validate the IMERG precipitation products through the use of SMAP soil moisture changes as a proxy for precipitation occurrence. Using a standard 2x2 contingency table method, preliminary results provide confidence in SMAP’s ability to be utilized as a validation tool for IMERG as results are comparable to previous validation studies. However, the method allows for an overestimate of false alarm frequency due to light precipitation events that can evaporate before the subsequent SMAP overpass and changes in overpass-to-overpass SMAP soil moisture that are within the range of SMAP uncertainty. To counter these issues, a 3x3 contingency table is used to reduce noise and extract more signal from the detection method. Through the use of this novel approach, the validation method produces a global mean POD of 0.64 and global mean FAR of 0.40, the first global-scale ground validation skill scores for the IMERG products. Advancing the method to validate precipitation quantity and the development of a real-time validation for the IMERG Early product are the crucial next developments.

Precipitation↗