Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20170006621

Flow Structure Comparison for Two 7-Point LDI Configurations

Hicks, Yolanda R.·Tacina, Kathleen M.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison primarily of the 2-D velocity profiles in the non-burning system; and for the luminescent flame structure for a 7-point Lean Direct Injector (LDI). This circular LDI array consists of a center element surrounded by six outer elements spaced 60 degrees apart; the spacing between all adjacent elements is the same. Each element consists of simplex atomizer that injects at the throat of a converging-diverging venturi, and an axial swirler upstream of the venturi throat to generate swirl. The two configurations were: 1) one which consists of all 60 co-swirling axial air swirlers, and; 2) one configuration which uses a 60 swirler in the center, surrounded by counter-swirling 45 swirlers. Testing was done at 5 atm and an inlet temperature of 800F. Two air reference velocities were considered in the cold flow measurements and one common air flow condition for the burning case.The 2D velocity profiles were determined using particle image velocimetry and the flame structure was determined using high speed photography.

Explore related subjects

velocitycombustionlean direct injection

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hicks, Yolanda R., Tacina, Kathleen M.. 2017-04-23. Flow Structure Comparison for Two 7-Point LDI Configurations. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170006621

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2017

Flow Structure Comparison for Two 7-Point LDI Configurations

This paper presents a comparison primarily of the cold flow 2-D velocity profiles; and describes flame tube combusting flow operability for a 7-point Lean Direct Injector (LDI). This circular LDI array consists of a center element surrounded by six outer elements spaced 60 degrees apart; the spacing between all adjacent elements is the same. Each element consists of a simplex atomizer that injects at the throat of a converging-diverging venturi, and an axial swirler upstream of the venturi throat to generate swirl. The two configurations were: 1) one which consists of all 60 deg co-swirling axial air swirlers, and; 2) one configuration which uses a 60 deg swirler in the center, surrounded by counter-swirling 45 deg swirlers. Testing was done at 5- bar and at an inlet temperature of 700K. Two air reference velocities were considered in the cold flow measurements. The 2D velocity profiles were determined using particle image velocimetry. Results indicate the configuration using all 60 deg swirlers generates a field that moderates to a more uniform distribution at a shorter distance downstream and is more easily operable than the second configuration, which produces recirculation regions at the edges of the outer 45 deg swirlers, and results in a more stratified velocity field at any given axial location.

velocity↗
NASA NTRS2005

Computation of the Streamfunction and Velocity Potential for Limited and Irregular Domains

An algorithm is proposed for the computation of streamfunction and velocity potential from given horizontal velocity vectors based on solving a minimization problem. To guarantee the uniqueness of the solution and computational reliability of the algorithm, a Tikhonov regularization is applied. The solution implies that the obtained streamfunction and velocity potential have minimal magnitude, while the given velocity vectors can be accurately reconstructed from the computed streamfunction and velocity potential. Because the formulation of the minimization problem allows for circumventing the explicit specification of separate boundary conditions on the streamfunction and velocity potential, the algorithm is easily applicable to irregular domains. By using an advanced minimization algorithm with the use of adjoint techniques, the method is computationally efficient and suitable for problems with large dimensions. An example is presented for coastal oceans to illustrate the practical application of the algorithm.

velocity↗