Developments and Challenges Related to Thermal Process Modeling of Metallic Laser Powder Bed Fusion to Advance Certification of Flight Hardware

Josh Fody

Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20200004003

Developments and Challenges Related to Thermal Process Modeling of Metallic Laser Powder Bed Fusion to Advance Certification of Flight Hardware

Josh Fody

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Josh Fody. Developments and Challenges Related to Thermal Process Modeling of Metallic Laser Powder Bed Fusion to Advance Certification of Flight Hardware. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200004003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

DOE OSTI2025

Strategies for Fabricating Molybdenum Structures Using Laser Powder Bed Fusion

Advances in manufacturing techniques are viewed as enabling technologies for development of high performance nuclear fuel forms that couple high uranium density with improvements to key properties such as thermal conductivity unattainable through conventional fabrication routes. Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the fabrication of complex fuel geometries that are difficult or impossible to achieve using conventional manufacturing methods. Melting-based AM processes, such as laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), provide high geometric resolution (>200 µm depending on the feature) across a variety of metal alloys, including those suitable for high-temperature fuel cladding applications, such as Nb, W, and Mo. Molybdenum is particularly attractive due to its high thermal conductivity, low thermal expansion, and excellent mechanical stability at elevated temperatures. However, its high melting temperature and brittle nature at low temperatures pose significant challenges during LPBF processing. Rapid solidification inherent to LPBF induces high residual stresses, often leading to post-solidification cracking, which limits the manufacturability of Mo components via this method.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2026

Compositional Homogeneity in Rapidly Solidified 316L stainless steel produced by laser powder-bed fusion processing

The segregation of alloying elements in rapidly solidified 316L stainless steel produced using additive manufacturing technologies is widely reported throughout literature. The microstructure of thin walls manufactured from 316L stainless steel using laser powder bed fusion are examined for the presence of alloy segregation, i.e. the rejection of solutes to grain boundaries. Metallographic methods including mechanical polishing and chemical etching are used to prepare samples for microanalysis m

Jankowski, Alan F. [Sandia National Laboratories (↗

NASA NTRS2026

Fatigue Behavior of Laser Powder Bed Fused HAYNES 214: Effects of Different Surface Treatments

In this study, under NASA’s Rapid and Analysis Manufacturing Propulsion Technology (RAMPT) project, effects of different surface post-treatments on surface texture and fatigue behavior of L-PBF Alloy 214 were investigated. Various subtractive SPTs including abrasive flow machining (AFM), machining (M), shot peening (SP), vapormatt (VM), dry electropolishing (DE), chemical milling (CM), chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP), electro chemical (ECP) were applied to study the variations of the surface texture, microstructure and uniaxial fatigue behavior under fully reversed strain-controlled condition at four different strain amplitudes of 0.005, 0.004, 0.003, and 0.0025 mm/mm. The insights gained regarding the relationship between structural and mechanical properties for different SPTs can help establish guidelines for selecting the most effective process to enhance the performance of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) Alloy 214, especially for critical aerospace applications.

Post-Processing↗