Performance Testing of TRL4-6 LISA Laser System

Kenji Numata; Anthony Yu; Molly Fahey; Max Pinchinat; Ali Feizi; Hua Jiao; Jennifer Lee

NASA NTRS · 20240008098

Performance Testing of TRL4-6 LISA Laser System

Kenji Numata·Anthony Yu·Molly Fahey·Max Pinchinat·Ali Feizi·Hua Jiao·Jennifer Lee

Abstract

The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is an ESA-led future mission to measure gravitational waves from astronomical sources in space. LISA has been adopted as a formal mission by ESA in January 2024, and is expected to become a formal project at NASA within 2024. The laser system (LS), which includes four laser heads (LH) each containing a laser optical module (LOM) and laser electronics module (LEM), a frequency reference system (FRS, optical frequency reference) and four power monitor detectors (PMON), is one of the three U.S. contributions to LISA from NASA. The Lasers and Electro-Optics Branch at NASA GSFC has been developing and managing the design of the LISA LS. Currently, the TRL (technology readiness level) of the NASA LISA laser system is transitioning from 4 to 6. TRL 4/5 LISA LOM was sent to ESA in early 2023 and has undergone optical performance testing. [1] By late summer of 2024, NASA plans to deliver the TRL 6 LOM to ESA for performance evaluation. Since the delivery of the TRL4/5 LOM to ESA, we have taken steps to advance the TRL of the overall LS and have also started end-to-end system level testing involving other subsystems. They include 1) optical performance test of TRL6 LOM and TRL 5 LEM under thermal cycling, 2) end-to-end test of the laser head (LH) and the GSE (ground support equipment) FRS, driven by TRL 4 FRS electronics (FRS-E) provided by Ball Aerospace, 3) end-to-end test of the laser head (LH) with the GSE phase meter system (PMS) provided by Albert Einstein Institute, and 4) optical performance test of the LH with the PMON subsystem developed by NASA. The FRS, PMS, and PMON provide necessary frequency stability, relative phase stability between lasers, and output power stability, respectively. Since they are all vital for the sensitive laser interferometry performed in LISA, it is necessary to perform these system level testing by combining the LH and other subsystems, and to prove the optical performance at an early stage during the LS development. Our recent work has successfully demonstrated the intra-connectivity of the LS, as well as critical external interface with the PMS to meet the LISA’s performance requirements. In this talk, we will report on the latest status of the LH testing and system level test. We will also discuss the paths to bring each subsystem to TRL6+ and plans for future system level testing.

Explore related subjects

LISA Space Lasers

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Kenji Numata, Anthony Yu, Molly Fahey, Max Pinchinat, Ali Feizi, Hua Jiao, Jennifer Lee. Performance Testing of TRL4-6 LISA Laser System. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240008098

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2025

Mind the Gap: Addressing Data Gaps and Assessing Noise Mismodeling in LISA

Due to the sheer complexity of the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) space mission, data gaps arising from instrumental irregularities and/or scheduled maintenance are unavoidable. Focusing on merger-dominated massive black hole binary signals, we test the appropriateness of the Whittle-likelihood on gapped data in a variety of cases. From first principles, we derive the likelihood valid for gapped data in both the time and frequency domains. Cheap-to-evaluate proxies to p-p plots are derived based on a Fisher-based formalism, and verified through Bayesian techniques. Our tools allow to predict the altered variance in the parameter estimates that arises from noise mismodeling, as well as the information loss represented by the broadening of the posteriors. The result of noise mismodeling with gaps is sensitive to the characteristics of the noise model, with strong low-frequency (red) noise and strong high-frequency (blue) noise giving statistically significant fluctuations in recovered parameters. We demonstrate that the introduction of a tapering window reduces statistical inconsistency errors, at the cost of less precise parameter estimates. We also show that the assumption of independence between inter-gap segments appears to be a fair approximation even if the data set is inherently coherent. However, if one instead assumes fictitious correlations in the data stream, when the data segments are actually independent, then the resultant parameter recoveries could be inconsistent with the true parameters. The theoretical and numerical practices that are presented in this work could readily be incorporated into global-fit pipelines operating on gapped data.

LISA↗

NASA NTRS2025

Efficient GPU-Accelerated MultiSource Global Fit Pipeline for LISA Data Analysis

The large-scale analysis task of deciphering gravitational-wave signals in the LISA data stream will be difficult, requiring a large amount of computational resources and extensive development of computational methods. Its high dimensionality, multiple model types, and complicated noise profile require a global fit to all parameters and input models simultaneously. In this work, we detail our global fit algorithm, called “Erebor,” designed to accomplish this challenging task. It is capable of analyzing current state-of-the-art datasets and then growing into the future as more pieces of the pipeline are completed and added. We describe our pipeline strategy, the algorithmic setup, and the results from our analysis of the LDC2A Sangria dataset, which contains massive black hole binaries, compact galactic binaries, and a parametrized noise spectrum whose parameters are unknown to the user. The Erebor algorithm includes three unique and very useful contributions: GPU acceleration for enhanced computational efficiency; ensemble Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling with multiple MCMC walkers per temperature for better mixing and parallelized sample creation; and special online updates to reversible-jump (or transdimensional) sampling distributions to ensure sampler mixing and accurate initial estimates for detectable sources in the data.We recover posterior distributions for all 15 (6) of the injected massive black hole binaries (MBHB) in the LDC2A training (hidden) dataset. We catalog ∼12000 galactic binaries (∼8000 as high confidence detections) for both the training and hidden datasets. All of the sources and their posterior distributions are provided in publicly available catalogs.

LISA↗

NASA NTRS2020

In-flight Testing of the Injection of the LISA Pathfinder Test Mass into a Geodesic

LISA Pathfinder is a technology demonstrator space mission, aimed at testing key technologies for detecting gravitational waves in space. The mission is the precursor of LISA, the first space gravitational waves observatory, whose launch is scheduled for 2034. The LISA Pathfinder scientific payload includes two gravitational reference sensors (GRSs), each one containing a test mass (TM), which is the sensing body of the experiment. A mission critical task is to set each TM into a pure geodesic motion, i.e. guaranteeing an extremely low acceleration noise in the sub-Hertz frequency bandwidth. The grabbing positioning and release mechanism (GPRM), responsible for the injection of the TM into a geodesic trajectory, was widely tested on ground, with the limitations imposed by the 1-g environment. The experiments showed that the mechanism, working in its nominal conditions, is capable of releasing the TM into free-fall fulfilling the very strict constraint imposed on the TM residual velocity, in order to allow its capture on behalf of the electrostatic actuation. However, the first in-flight releases produced unexpected residual velocity components, for both the TMs. Moreover, all the residual velocity components were greater than maximum value set by the requirements. The main suspect is that unexpected contacts took place between the TM and the surroundings bodies. As a consequence, ad hoc manual release procedures had to be adopted for the few following injections performed during the nominal mission. These procedures still resulted in non compliant TM states which were captured only after impacts. However, such procedures seem not practicable for LISA, both for the limited repeatability of the system and for the unmanageable time lag of the telemetry/telecommand signals (about 4400 s). For this reason, at the end of the mission, the GPRM was deeply tested in-flight, performing a large number of releases, according to different strategies. The tests were carried out in order to understand the unexpected dynamics and limit its effects on the final injection. Some risk mitigation maneuvers have been tested aimed at minimizing the vibration of the system at the release and improving the alignment between the mechanism and the TM. However, no overall optimal release strategy to be implemented in LISA could be found, because the two GPRMs behaved differently.

LISA↗