Search NASA⌕ Search

NASA NTRS · 20240008623

Flammability of Materials on the Moon

Abstract

Some materials have recently been found to exhibit increased flammability in Lunar gravity. The reduced buoyancy driven flow on the Moon may present a goldilocks region of decreased convective cooling, while still supplying adequate oxidizer to the flame zone. Combined with the desired elevated oxygen habitat of exploration architectures and the difficulty of rescue, the combination could present increased risk to crew. Flammability of Materials on the Moon will be delivered to the Lunar surface on an HLS lander, and will burn four samples; SIBAL fabric will be exposed to normal air while the PMMA rods will be exposed to the normoxic Space Exploration Atmospheres (SEA) with elevated oxygen in a small atmospheric chamber. Each fuel will have two tests each, one burning upward and one burning downward. The results of flame size, spread rate, atmosphere changes, and extinction oxygen concentration will then be analyzed and used to help quantify the risk and mitigation for future exploration missions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jennifer Zayac, Michael Johnston, Gary Ruff, Paul Ferkul. Flammability of Materials on the Moon. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240008623

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Low Pressure Flame Blowoff from the Forward Stagnation Region of a Blunt-Nosed Cast PMMA Cylinder in Axial Mixed Convective Flow

Low-pressure blowoff experiments were conducted with a stagnation flame stabilized on the forward tip of cast PMMA rods in a vertical wind tunnel. Pressure, forced flow velocity, gravity, and ambient oxygen concentration were varied. Stagnation flame blowoff is determined from a time-stamped video recording of the test. The blowoff pressure is determined from test section pressure transducer data that is synchronized with the time stamp. The forced flow velocity is also determined from the choked flow orifice pressure. Most of the tests were performed in normal gravity, but a handful of microgravity tests were also conducted to determine the influence of buoyant flow velocity on the blowoff limits. The blowoff limits are found to have a linear dependence between the partial pressure of oxygen and the total pressure, regardless of forced flow velocity and gravity level. The flow velocity (forced and/or buoyant) affects the blowoff pressure through the critical Damkohler number residence time, which dictates the partial pressure of oxygen at blowoff. This is because the critical stretch rate increases linearly with increasing pressure at low pressure (sub-atmospheric pressures) since a second-order overall reaction rate with two-body reactions dominates in this pressure range.

flammability↗

Microgravity Flammability of PMMA Rods in Concurrent Flow

Microgravity experiments burning cast PMMA cylindrical rods in axial flow have been conducted aboard the International Space Station in the Microgravity Science Glovebox (MSG) facility using the Burning and Suppression of Solids (BASS) flow duct, as part of the BASS-II experiment. Twenty-four concurrent-flow tests were performed, focusing on finding flammability limits as a function of oxygen and flow speed. The oxygen was varied by using gaseous nitrogen to vitiate the working volume of the MSG. The speed of the flow parallel to the rod was varied using a fan at the entrance to the duct. Both blowoff and quenching limits were obtained at several oxygen concentrations. Each experiment ignited the rod at the initially hemispherical stagnation tip of the rod, and allowed the flame to develop and heat the rod at a sufficient flow to sustain burning. For blowoff limit tests, the astronaut quickly turned up the flow to obtain extinction. Complementary 5.18-second Zero Gravity Facility drop tests were conducted to compare blowoff limits in short and long duration microgravity. For quenching tests, the flow was incrementally turned down and the flame allowed to stabilize at the new flow condition for at least the solid-phase response time before changing it again. Quenching was observed when the flow became sufficiently weak that the flame could no longer provide adequate heat flux to compensate for the heat losses (conduction into the rod and radiation). A surface energy balance is presented that shows the surface radiative loss exceeds the conductive loss into the rod near the limit. The flammability boundary is shown to represent a critical Damkohler number, expressed in terms of the reaction rate divided by the stretch rate. For the blowoff branch, the boundary exhibits a linear dependence on oxygen concentration and stretch rate, indicating that the temperature at blowoff must be fairly constant. For the quenching branch, the dominance of the exponential nature of the Arrhenius kinetics reaction rate indicates that the temperature is critical.

flammability↗

Applying Flammability Limit Probabilities and the Normoxic Upward Limiting Pressure Concept to NASA STD-6001 Test 1

Repeated Test 1 extinction tests near the upward flammability limit are expected to follow a Poisson process trend. This Poisson process trend suggests that rather than define a ULOI and MOC (which requires two limits to be determined), it might be better to define a single upward limit as being where 1/e (where e (approx. equal to 2.7183) is the characteristic time of the normalized Poisson process) of the materials burn, or, rounding, where approximately 1/3 of the samples fail the test (and burn). Recognizing that spacecraft atmospheres will not bound the entire oxygen-pressure parameter space, but actually lie along the normoxic atmosphere control band, we can focus the materials flammability testing along this normoxic band. A Normoxic Upward Limiting Pressure (NULP) is defined that determines the minimum safe total pressure for a material within the constant partial pressure control band. Then, increasing this pressure limit by a factor of safety, we can define the material as being safe to use at the NULP + SF (where SF is on the order of 10 kilopascal, based on existing flammability data). It is recommended that the thickest material to be tested with the current Test 1 igniter should be 3 mm thick (1/8 inches) to avoid the problem of differentiating between an ignition limit and a true flammability limit.

flammability↗