Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1558498

Process–structure–property relationships in bimodal machined microstructures using robust structure descriptors

Abstract

Machining is a severe plastic deformation process that subjects materials to high rates of deformation and elevated temperatures. Dynamic recrystallization during severe plastic deformation drives grain refinement into the sub-micron range but the ductility and thermal stability of these structures is poor. In contrast, bimodal microstructures consisting of both fine and coarse grains have been shown to exhibit attractive strength and ductility properties at these temperatures. In this paper, we study the process–structure–property relationships for pure copper subject to a machining process where the cutting speeds are varied. Further, we investigate the role of thermal effects by varying the post-deformation cooling rates. Microstructures generated under these deformation conditions are quantified using angularly resolved chord length statistics. The derived metrics are found to be robust descriptors of the studied microstructures as they automatically capture complex features such as unimodal and bimodal distributions of grain structure, grain constituent length scales, and morphological anisotropy induced by shear deformation. The uniaxial equivalent yield strength of the generated structures are estimated using spherical nanoindentation and inverse modeling techniques. Lastly, we present a methodology for identifying the constrained property-process inverse mapping for machining using a Bayesian framework and the established forward process–structure–property mapping.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fernandez-Zelaia, Patxi, Melkote, Shreyes N.. 2019-05-29. Process–structure–property relationships in bimodal machined microstructures using robust structure descriptors. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116251

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗