Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1577991

Indoor versus Outdoor Air Quality during Wildfires

Abstract

The human behavioral modification recommendations during wildfire events are based on particulate matter and may be confounded by the potential risks of gas-phase pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Moreover, the majority of adults spend over 90 percent of their time indoors where there is an increased concern of indoor air quality during wildfire events. We address these timely concerns by evaluating paired indoor and outdoor PAH concentrations in residential locations and their relationship with satellite model-based categorization of wildfire smoke intensity. Low density polyethylene passive air samplers were deployed at six residential sites for one week in Eugene, Oregon with matched indoor and outdoor samples and twenty-four-hour time resolution. Samples were then quantitatively analyzed for 63 PAH concentrations using gas-chromatography. A probabilistic principal components analysis was used to reduce all 63 PAHs into an aggregate measure. Linear regression of the first principal component against indoor versus outdoor shows that indoor gas-phase PAH concentrations are consistently equal or greater than outdoor concentrations. Regression against a satellite-based model for wildfire smoke shows that outdoor, but not indoor gas-phase PAH concentrations are likely associated with wildfire events. Furthermore, these results point towards the need to include gas-phase pollutants such as PAHs in air pollution risk assessment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Messier, Kyle P., Tidwell, Lane G., Ghetu, Christine C., Rohlman, Diana, Scott, Richard P., Bramer, Lisa M., Dixon, Holly M., Waters, Katrina M., Anderson, Kim A.. 2019-11-11. Indoor versus Outdoor Air Quality during Wildfires. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00599

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Water4Energy Step-1 Band-M Ready-to-Train Samples for TVA Weeks-to-Years Prediction, Version 0

AI-ready Band-M (monthly) labelled training pack for the Water4Energy Genesis Task-1 project on weeks-to-years prediction of Tennessee Valley temperature and precipitation. The deposit includes leakage-aware issue-time samples (samples_M_v0.nc; N=486), train-only scalers, issue-time split table, supporting monthly panels, and Python generation scripts to recreate the pack from the companion Tier-1 raw observation collection (https://doi.org/10.13139/ORNLNCCS/3398576). Each sample pairs a 12-month lookback of teleconnection indices and SST box anomalies with TVA-mean ERA5 anomaly targets (t2m, tp, msl) at leads 1–3 months.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera, particle analysis

The c1 level data product for the Mutli-Angle Snowflake Camera contains snowflake fall speeds and particle size, among other analysis for images associated with each hydrometeor.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera, time bins

The c1 level data product for the Mutli-Angle Snowflake Camera contains snowflake fall speeds and particle size, among other analysis for images associated with each hydrometeor.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗