Comparative study of Minnesota functionals performance on ferroelectric BaTiO 3 and PbTiO 3

Abstract

Density functional theory based simulations are the leading tool for the computational investigation of ferroelectrics and the parametrization of their classical potentials. However, the predictions often depend strongly on the exchange correlation functional. The most popular choices, LDA and GGA, tend to underestimate or overestimate some structural, electric, and energy properties. These impede development of highly accurate classical potentials that extend the reach of first-principles simulations to finite temperatures and realistic sizes. In this work, we investigate the performance of recently developed Minnesota exchange correlation functionals on prototypical ferroelectrics BaTiO 3 , and PbTiO 3 , in comparison with some popular ones. We find that there exists strong correlation between predictions for some properties (tetragonality, phase energy difference, and polarization) by different functionals. Along the correlation line, we find a range of functionals (including some from the Minnesota suite) whose predictions fall in between those of LDA and GGA and, therefore, offer an improvement. A way to relatively rank functional performance with respect to chosen benchmarks is proposed and applied to identify the top performers for BaTiO 3 and PbTiO 3 . Here, the performance is found to be material dependent. Therefore, we propose that the performance assessment carried out in this work is employed to "screen" functionals prior to their use on ferroelectrics. Quick and computationally inexpensive, it is likely to lead to improved descriptions, especially for classical potential parametrization. The Minnesota functional suite is found to be suitable for this task.