Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 1836179

A Comparative Study of Joint Modeling Methods and Analysis of Fasteners [Slides]

Garcia, Jr., Ricardo Manuel·Ross, Michael·Pacini, Benjamin Robert·Roettgen, Daniel Robert
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Motivation: Crucial aspect of mechanical design is joining methodology of parts. Ability to analyze joint and fasteners in system for structural integrity is fundamental. Different modeling representations of fasteners include spring, beam, and solid elements. Various methods compared for linear system to decide method appropriate for design study. New method for modeling fastener joint is explored from full system perspective. Analysis results match well with published experimental data for new method.

Explore related subjects

42 ENGINEERING

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Garcia, Jr., Ricardo Manuel, Ross, Michael, Pacini, Benjamin Robert, Roettgen, Daniel Robert. 2021-12-16. A Comparative Study of Joint Modeling Methods and Analysis of Fasteners [Slides]. https://doi.org/10.2172/1836179

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Large language models for transportation research: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) is transforming transportation research, with significant advancements emerging between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the inception and swift growth of adopting and adapting LLMs for various transportation applications. Despite these significant advancements, however, a systematic review and synthesis of the existing literature remains lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of the methodologies and applications of LLMs in transportation. We explore key applications, including autonomous driving, travel behavior prediction, and general transportation-related queries, alongside LLM methodologies such as zero- or few-shot learning, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning. From the review, critical research gaps are identified. From the methodological perspective, many of the research limitations can be addressed by integrating LLMs with existing tools and refining LLM architectures. From the application perspective, research opportunities for LLMs to address various transportation challenges are also explored. By synthesizing these findings, this review not only presents the state-of-the-art LLM adoption and adaptation in transportation, but also proposes future research directions as well as insights and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, paving the way for greater LLM-driven research innovations in transportation in the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗