Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1865396

Solvation Dynamics of Wet Ethaline: Water is the Magic Component

Also available from

Abstract

The past two decades witnessed the development of a new type of solvent system, named deep eutectic solvents, which have become increasingly investigated because they offer new and potentially favorable properties, such as wide tunability in electrochemical, mechanical, and transport properties. Deep eutectic solvent (DES) systems are composed of at least one main solvent and an additional component that is meant to interrupt the original solvent/solvent interactions, thereby introducing lower melting points relative to each individual component. Ethaline (a 1:2 mole% mixture of choline chloride and ethylene glycol) is one of the most promising DES systems. However, it is also known to be very hygroscopic, which is a constant concern because water absorption during the use of ethaline alters its properties. Within this work, we demonstrate that modest amounts of water addition (1-10%) to ethaline are of little concern for practical use and can even lead to performance improvements, such as accelerated relaxation and solvation. In contrast, very small amounts of <1% of water lead to additional slowing of the solvent response. Thus, we suggest that the attempt to dry ethaline below 1% moisture is rather counter-productive if one attempts to achieve effective solvation and charge transport properties from DESs. This study investigates the effect of water content on the diffusional relaxation dynamics of ethaline. A set of independent spectroscopic experiments and computational simulations are aimed to provide insight into the solvent response of the DES system using femtosecond time-resolved absorption spectroscopy (fs-TA), broadband dielectric spectroscopy (BDS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) diffusometry and broadband relaxometry, and molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) on ethaline with 0, 0.1, 1, 10, and 28.5wt% added water. For dry ethaline, we identify choline chloride as the rate-limiting solvation component in ethaline. However, the role of the solvent components changes gradually as water is added. Further, we provide quantitative solvent relaxation rates using the different presented time-resolved spectroscopic techniques and find remarkable agreement between them. Based on the solvent relaxation rates and combined with MDS, we develop a molecular understanding of the individual solvent components and their interactions in dry and wet ethaline with varying amounts of water content.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alfurayj, Ibrahim, Fraenza, Carla Cecilia, Zhang, Yong, Pandian, Rathiesh, Spittle, Stephanie, Hansen, Bryce, Dean, William, Gurkan, Burcu, Savinell, Robert, Greenbaum, Steve, Maginn, Edward, Sangoro, Joshua, Burda, Clemens. 2021-08-02. Solvation Dynamics of Wet Ethaline: Water is the Magic Component. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c04629

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

An immersed interface method for microstructure-scale electrochemical battery models: numerical formulation and performance portable implementation

We present the numerical formulation, verification, and performance portable implementation of an immersed interface method for microstructure scale electrochemical modeling of batteries. The innovation in this approach is the resolution of chemical species and electrostatic potential discontinuities at active interfaces without the use of interface conforming unstructured grids. A unified formulation on Cartesian grids for all domains (electrodes and electrolyte) is used with interfacial flux conditions applied using volume fraction or “color” function gradients. We have developed one dimensional and two dimensional test cases with analytic solutions for electrochemical modeling using which we verified the consistency and accuracy of our scheme. Our solver is also validated against solutions from a macroscale model and an unstructured multi-subdomain solver for a full lithium ion cell. We then demonstrated the utility of our solver on an image-based complex battery electrode microstructure at high charging rate. Our technique also exhibits good scalability on distributed memory architectures using central processing units (CPU), with problem sizes up to 1.8 billion degrees of freedom and with 5400 ranks. Initial performance studies of our open-source performance portable solver showed about 70 times speed up using a graphics processing unit (GPU) compared to single compute core for a problem with 4 million cells.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Solvation-guided inhibition of manganese dissolution of lithium- and manganese- rich cathode via cyclic carbonate molecular engineering

Lithium and manganese-rich (LMR) layered oxides represent a leading class of high-energy cathode materials, but their practical realization is fundamentally limited by severe manganese (Mn) dissolution, a process that triggers structural degradation and rapid capacity fade. While mitigation efforts have predominantly focused on interfacial engineering, the intrinsic contribution of bulk electrolyte solvation to this degradation pathway remains largely unexplored, primarily due to the difficulty of deconvolving its effects from concurrent cathode-electrolyte interphase (CEI) formation. Here, we report an experimental design to isolate the role of solvation. We systematically varied the electrolyte solvent solvation power by substituting the strongly coordinating ethylene carbonate (EC) with its weaker coordinating fluorinated derivatives, fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) and trans-4,5-Difluoro-1,3-dioxolan-2-one (DFEC), while maintaining a consistent interfacial chemistry. Remarkably, the electrolyte formulated with the weakest solvent, DFEC, exhibits superior cycling stability, suppressing Mn dissolution by up to 63% relative to the conventional EC-based system. Post-mortem analysis unequivocally attributes this performance enhancement to the preservation of the LMR cathode's structural integrity, a direct consequence of mitigated Mn dissolution. This work provides conclusive evidence that modulating bulk electrolyte solvation is a potent and direct strategy for stabilizing LMR cathodes, establishing a vital design principle for next-generation battery systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Geothermal district energy systems coupled with seasonal underground thermal energy storage: a U.S. techno-economic screening by climate and geology

In the United States, cooling-dominated commercial building loads can cause geothermal heat pump-based district energy systems to accumulate a long-term subsurface thermal imbalance, motivating the incorporation of seasonal underground thermal energy storage. We developed a transferable workflow to evaluate geothermal district systems that pair ground heat exchangers with seasonal underground thermal energy storage. Using standardized hourly loads for seven commercial buildings and a uniform cost framework, we simulated ten U.S. cities with a physics-based ground heat exchanger model, subsurface storage simulations, and economic assessment to isolate the roles of climate and hydrogeology. In cooling-dominated cities, underground thermal energy storage supplied the majority of annual cooling, cutting electricity use and summer peaks substantially while achieving levelized costs comparable to or below conventional chiller-boiler plants. In cooler climates, the storage share shrunk, required borefield size and costs rose, and levelized cost of energy increased nearly linearly with declining underground thermal energy storage fraction, indicating storage fraction as the primary economic lever. Sensitivity analysis showed capital risk dominated by borefield drilling and surface heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning and piping, with underground thermal energy storage costs secondary. This workflow provides a transparent foundation for site-specific design and screening of next-generation geothermal district energy systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗