Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1893354

Challenges and Opportunities in Decarbonizing the U.S. Energy System

Abstract

The United States has pledged to develop a 100% carbon-free electric power system by 2035 and a net-zero-emissions economy by 2050. While important advancements have been made in the scale, performance, and economics of clean energy technologies, meeting the nation's ambitious goals will not only require their deployment at scale, but also additional innovation and effective integration of different solutions. Technological developments across the broad suite of low-carbon energy solutions are advancing rapidly, with ongoing innovations in renewable electricity generation, industrial processes, and energy-saving technologies and services, including LED lighting, induction heating, electric vehicles, energy storage solutions, and mobility as a service, plus smart devices, controls, and more efficient and smart buildings. Combining renewable electricity with biotic and abiotic pathways to produce chemicals, fuels, and materials promises to deliver new solutions. Grid-interactive buildings and communities, integrating transportation infrastructure and vehicles, are likely to be significant components of any zero-carbon energy strategy. Low-carbon industrial manufacturing will also make strong contributions to a net-zero economy. While the technical prospects appear promising, variations in the state of infrastructure, jurisdictional and social equity, pollution, economic and socio-cultural constraints, energy resource availability, and supply chain dynamics found in different locations present a range of challenges and demand customized solutions. This paper provides a critical review and offers new insights into the technical, infrastructure, analytic, political, and economic challenges faced in translating the nation's ambitious net-zero-emissions goals into feasible and reliable implementation action plans.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arent, Douglas J., Green, Peter, Abdullah, Zia, Barnes, Teresa, Bauer, Sage, Bernstein, Andrey, Berry, Derek, Berry, Joe, Burrell, Tony, Carpenter, Birdie (ORCID:0000000170953681), Cochran, Jaquelin, Cortright, Randy, Curry-Nkansah, Maria, Denholm, Paul (ORCID:0000000171284643), Gevorgian, Vahan, Himmel, Michael, Livingood, Bill (ORCID:0000000183918201), Keyser, Matt (ORCID:000000026929847X), King, Jennifer (ORCID:0000000162190098), Kroposki, Ben, Mai, Trieu (ORCID:0000000317513892), Mehos, Mark (ORCID:0000000237708657), Muratori, Matteo (ORCID:0000000316886742), Narumanchi, Sreekant (ORCID:0000000153376069), Pivovar, Bryan (ORCID:0000000151815363), Romero-Lankao, Patty (ORCID:0000000195332363), Ruth, Mark (ORCID:0000000218380617), Stark, Greg (ORCID:000000017872295X), Turchi, Craig (ORCID:0000000256956090). 2022-09-21. Challenges and Opportunities in Decarbonizing the U.S. Energy System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112939

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment of Chemical Recycling and Upcycling of Mixed Plastics Waste Containing Poly-vinyl-chloride

Developing technologies that completely remove chlorine from plastic waste can allow its chemical recycling and upcycling with catalytic methods. Here, this study compares eight processes involving different dechlorination methods (absorption columns, adsorption in beds of zeolites, catalytic dechlorination, and dissolution in ionic liquids) and chemical conversion technologies (incineration, pyrolysis, hydrogenolysis) to upgrade mixed plastics waste to various products (e.g., electricity, fuels, virgin polymers, and lubricant oil). The analysis determines that the absorption of chlorine in columns with basic aqueous solutions is limited to plastics waste with PVC concentrations below 0.1%. Dissolution in ionic liquids is not cost-competitive. On the contrary, two-step processes with catalytic dechlorination followed by thermochemical catalytic depolymerization, either pyrolysis or hydrogenolysis, significantly improve process economics and emissions. The most economically viable alternative is hydrogenolysis for producing lubricants, while the technology with the lowest global warming potential is chemical recycling via catalytic pyrolysis.

circular economy↗

Challenges in Tracking Waste Reduction Performance Improvement in Manufacturing Plants

The recently released Circularity Gap Report 2023 by the Circle Economy Foundation states that the circularity score for the global economy is declining. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tracked municipal solid waste from 1960 to 2018 and found that 50% of the waste was destined for landfills. EPA estimates that US industry is responsible for 2.7 Gt of solid nonhazardous waste annually in the US mostly linear economy model. The circular economy framework aims to decouple economic value generation from the extraction of virgin materials from nature. The linear model of material extraction and disposal at the end of life is highly unsustainable. Manufacturing companies are adopting ambitious waste reduction targets to achieve sustainability. Through the Better Plants program, US DOE has established the Waste Reduction Network, which offers technical assistance to partners to achieve their ambitious waste reduction goals. Basic requirements of establishing a target include identifying a baseline, quantifying waste performance, and measuring progress over time. One problem faced by industry is unstandardized metrics for quantifying waste performance that may not be well suited to demonstrate progress. This paper studies traditional methods used to measure waste performance and highlights advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of each method. It also examines the suitability of applying the methods in different manufacturing circumstances. Finally, the paper presents a case study of a large manufacturer that faced inconsistencies in its tracked measurement metric. A solution was proposed and implemented to alter the methodology to enable more accurate waste performance tracking against a baseline.

circular economy↗