Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 2283337

Historic Source Inspection Records

Ulrich, Rachel Alicia·Kaufeld, Kimberly Ann·Kelly, Elizabeth J.
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

To create true counts of number of containers, each container can be identified by a combination of the purchase order, unique part number and type of inspection. The column TestEventName and any columns derived from TestEventName should not be used in the instance of presource inspection because the vendor may mete out testing over multiple months, meaning that a container would be counted twice if a single test was completed in one month and another test in a different month. By counting on this combination of values, we are able to drop row entries that signify multiple tests completed on a single container. Inspection type must be used because each container will be tested by the vendor and re-tested by the LANL container engineering team. Recall that the vendor will complete action limit tests for the full set of containers during pre-source inspection but during source inspection, action limit tests are completed for only a random subset. However, LANL SMEs will complete a manual inspection for the full set of containers.

Explore related subjects

42 ENGINEERING

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ulrich, Rachel Alicia, Kaufeld, Kimberly Ann, Kelly, Elizabeth J.. 2024-01-25. Historic Source Inspection Records. https://doi.org/10.2172/2283337

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Large language models for transportation research: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) is transforming transportation research, with significant advancements emerging between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the inception and swift growth of adopting and adapting LLMs for various transportation applications. Despite these significant advancements, however, a systematic review and synthesis of the existing literature remains lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of the methodologies and applications of LLMs in transportation. We explore key applications, including autonomous driving, travel behavior prediction, and general transportation-related queries, alongside LLM methodologies such as zero- or few-shot learning, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning. From the review, critical research gaps are identified. From the methodological perspective, many of the research limitations can be addressed by integrating LLMs with existing tools and refining LLM architectures. From the application perspective, research opportunities for LLMs to address various transportation challenges are also explored. By synthesizing these findings, this review not only presents the state-of-the-art LLM adoption and adaptation in transportation, but also proposes future research directions as well as insights and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, paving the way for greater LLM-driven research innovations in transportation in the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗