Modified Closures in Monte Carlo Algorithms for Diffusive Binary Stochastic Media Transport Problems

Abstract

In a stochastic medium, the material properties at a given spatial location are known only statistically. The most common approach to solving particle transport problems involving binary stochastic media (BSM) is to use the atomic mix approximation in which the transport problem is solved using homogenized (volume-averaged) material properties. A common deterministic model developed for solving BSM particle transport problems is the Levermore-Pomraning (LP) model. Zimmerman and Adams proposed a Monte Carlo algorithm (Algorithm A) that solves the LP equations and another Monte Carlo algorithm (Algorithm B) that locally preserves the sampled material realization; we refer to these Monte Carlo algorithms as the LP and LPLRP (LP local realization preserving) algorithms, respectively. One-dimensional (1D) planar geometry benchmark studies have shown that the LPLRP algorithm is often significantly more accurate than the LP algorithm for problems with an incident angular flux as well as for problems with an interior source. The LPLRP algorithm implementation in these benchmark comparisons made explicit use of the one-dimensional nature of the problem. The LP model is derived by assuming an 'upwind' closure in the coupling term relating the two materials in a binary stochastic medium. Su and Pomraning developed a modified form of this closure by considering the small correlation length limit and requiring the modified closure to produce the correct exponential decay for a source-free half-line albedo problem in rod geometry. They concluded that the modified closure is generally not inferior to the LP closure and in some cases is significantly better. Brantley investigated the use of the Su-Pomraning (SP) closure in the Monte Carlo LP algorithm (LP-SP) for the suite of benchmark problems and concluded that 1) the LP-SP algorithm was somewhat more accurate overall than the LP algorithm and somewhat less accurate overall than the LPLRP algorithm for an incident angular flux benchmark suite, and 2) the LP-SP algorithm was generally the least accurate of the algorithms for an interior source benchmark suite. Larsen et al. performed an asymptotic analysis of the transport equation in 1D planar geometry for the situation in which the physical system is 1) a random binary stochastic medium with material macroscopic total cross sections and mean slab width values of O(1) or smaller and 2) optically thick with weak absorption and sources at each spatial point and therefore globally diffusive. The asymptotic analysis demonstrates that, under these assumptions, the transport equation limits to the conventional diffusion equation with atomically-mixed (volume-averaged) material properties. Larsen et al. also demonstrate that, under these same assumptions, the LP equations asymptotically limit to an atomically-mixed diffusion equation with a diffusion coefficient that is too large, leading to an unphysical flattening of the ensemble-averaged scalar flux distribution. Vasques and Yadav recently performed an asymptotic analysis of an adjusted Levermore-Pomraning closure in which the Markovian transition functions are rescaled such that the equations asymptotically limit to the correct atomically-mixed diffusion equation; we refer to this model as LP-VY. In this paper, we demonstrate that the adjusted LP closure proposed by Vasques and Yadav is a special case of the SP closure obtained by assuming that the absorption cross sections in the two materials are equal. We further demonstrate that the Su-Pomraning closure has the correct asymptotic limit for the diffusive physical system and is therefore an appropriate closure for these problems. We also describe how to incorporate these various closures into the Monte Carlo LP and LPLRP particle transport algorithms, and we present numerical results comparing the accuracy of the Monte Carlo LP, LP-VY, LP-SP, LPLRP, and LPLRP-SP algorithms for the set of diffusive benchmark problems. We demonstrated that the SP closure has the correct asymptotic limit for the diffusive physical system under investigation in this paper and that the VY closure is a special case of the SP closure obtained by assuming equal absorption in the two materials. Both of these closures are readily implemented in the Monte Carlo LP and LPLRP algorithms for particle transport in BSM. Through numerical comparisons to a diffusive benchmark suite, we confirmed that 1) the LP and LPLRP algorithms do not limit to the appropriate diffusion solution and 2) the LP-VY, LP-SP, and LPLRP-SP algorithms limit to the appropriate diffusion solution and are of comparable accuracy. The LPLRP algorithm has been shown to be generally more accurate than the LP algorithm for non-diffusive problems. However, the numerical results in this paper indicate that the LPLRP algorithm does not limit to the correct diffusion equation for the asymptotic limit under consideration. The work in this paper demonstrates that the SP algorithm does limit to the correct diffusion equation for the asymptotic limit considered. Future work will investigate the possibility of whether the LPLRP-SP algorithm is accurate for both diffusive and non-diffusive problems.