Calculating Control Rod Differential Worth Using Adjoint-Weighted Method

Abstract

Recently, there are more and more research on using Monte Carlo method to calculate reactor important parameters. Control rod worth is one of the important parameters as it can determine the critical control rod position. There are two presentations of the control rod worth for utilization purpose, integral and differential. The former is the total reactivity change, while the latter is the reactivity change caused by per unit movement. In Monte Carlo calculation, differential control rod worth of a particular position is estimated by finite difference of reactivity between a small gap divided by gap distance. Though easy to implemented, the problem of this approach lies in that too large gap will enlarge error between 'differential' and 'difference', while too small gap will be disturbed by error caused by random fluctuation. Monte Carlo perturbation theory has been used to calculate the k{sub eff} sensitivity to certain parameters for a long time. By calculating the differential coefficient along with the k{sub eff}, this method is quite time-consuming and relatively accurate compared to finite difference method. Nevertheless, most of perturbation research focus on the perturbation of nuclide density or nuclear data. For geometrical perturbation, limited research was done before. Takahashi estimated the k{sub eff} sensitivity to reflector movement of pulsed fast reactor. MCNP6 used adjoint-weighted method for Godiva, Zeus and uranium oxyfluoride solution container benchmarks. This paper tries to apply the perturbation method to the determination of control rod differential worth. In this paper, based on RMC, a continuous-energy Reactor Monte Carlo transport code, Iterated Fission Probability method (IFP) is researched to calculate control rod differential worth on assembly level. IFP was originally developed by Hurwitz, and has been adopted by most of Monte Carlo code to compute adjoint-weighted parameters. This paper is organized with four parts. The first is introduction. Adjoint-weighted method is introduced in the second part. Problem 4 of benchmark from CASL is built to verify the method. Conclusion is given in final part.