Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 2543152

Recommendations for Comprehensive and Independent Evaluation of Machine Learning‐Based Earth System Models

Ullrich, P. A. [Division of Physical and Life Sciences Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USA, Department of Land Air and Water Resources University of California Davis CA USA] (ORCID:0000000341184590)·Barnes, E. A. [Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USA] (ORCID:0000000342849320)·Collins, W. D. [Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA, Department of Earth and Planetary Science University of California Berkeley CA USA] (ORCID:0000000244639848)·Dagon, K. [Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA] (ORCID:0000000245188225)·Duan, S. [Division of Physical and Life Sciences Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USA] (ORCID:000000031516852X)·Elms, J. [Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Indiana University Bloomington Bloomington IN USA]·Lee, J. [Division of Physical and Life Sciences Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USA] (ORCID:0000000200167199)·Leung, L. R. [Atmospheric, Climate, and Earth Sciences Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USA] (ORCID:0000000232219467)·Lu, D. [Computational Sciences and Engineering Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN USA] (ORCID:0000000151629843)·Molina, M. J. [Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science University of Maryland College Park MD USA] (ORCID:0000000185398916)·O’Brien, T. A. [Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA, Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA] (ORCID:0000000266431175)·Rebassoo, F. O. [Division of Physical and Life Sciences Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USA]

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning (ML) is a revolutionary technology with demonstrable applications across multiple disciplines. Within the Earth science community, ML has been most visible for weather forecasting, producing forecasts that rival modern physics‐based models. Given the importance of deepening our understanding and improving predictions of the Earth system on all time scales, efforts are now underway to develop Earth‐system models (ESMs) capable of representing all components of the coupled Earth system (or their aggregated behavior) and their response to external changes over long timescales. Building trust in ESMs is a much more difficult problem than for weather forecast models, not least because the model must represent the alternate (e.g., future or paleoclimatic) coupled states of the system for which there are no direct observations. Given that the physical principles that enable predictions about the response of the Earth system are often not explicitly coded in these ML‐based models, demonstrating the credibility of ML‐based ESMs thus requires us to build evidence of their consistency with the physical system. To this end, this paper puts forward five recommendations to enhance comprehensive, standardized, and independent evaluation of ML‐based ESMs to strengthen their credibility and promote their wider use.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ullrich, P. A. [Division of Physical and Life Sciences Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USA, Department of Land Air and Water Resources University of California Davis CA USA] (ORCID:0000000341184590), Barnes, E. A. [Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USA] (ORCID:0000000342849320), Collins, W. D. [Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA, Department of Earth and Planetary Science University of California Berkeley CA USA] (ORCID:0000000244639848), Dagon, K. [Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA] (ORCID:0000000245188225), Duan, S. [Division of Physical and Life Sciences Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USA] (ORCID:000000031516852X), Elms, J. [Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Indiana University Bloomington Bloomington IN USA], Lee, J. [Division of Physical and Life Sciences Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USA] (ORCID:0000000200167199), Leung, L. R. [Atmospheric, Climate, and Earth Sciences Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USA] (ORCID:0000000232219467), Lu, D. [Computational Sciences and Engineering Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN USA] (ORCID:0000000151629843), Molina, M. J. [Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science University of Maryland College Park MD USA] (ORCID:0000000185398916), O’Brien, T. A. [Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA, Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA] (ORCID:0000000266431175), Rebassoo, F. O. [Division of Physical and Life Sciences Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USA]. 2025-03-14. Recommendations for Comprehensive and Independent Evaluation of Machine Learning‐Based Earth System Models. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jh000496

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Water4Energy Step-1 Band-M Ready-to-Train Samples for TVA Weeks-to-Years Prediction, Version 0

AI-ready Band-M (monthly) labelled training pack for the Water4Energy Genesis Task-1 project on weeks-to-years prediction of Tennessee Valley temperature and precipitation. The deposit includes leakage-aware issue-time samples (samples_M_v0.nc; N=486), train-only scalers, issue-time split table, supporting monthly panels, and Python generation scripts to recreate the pack from the companion Tier-1 raw observation collection (https://doi.org/10.13139/ORNLNCCS/3398576). Each sample pairs a 12-month lookback of teleconnection indices and SST box anomalies with TVA-mean ERA5 anomaly targets (t2m, tp, msl) at leads 1–3 months.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera, particle analysis

The c1 level data product for the Mutli-Angle Snowflake Camera contains snowflake fall speeds and particle size, among other analysis for images associated with each hydrometeor.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera, time bins

The c1 level data product for the Mutli-Angle Snowflake Camera contains snowflake fall speeds and particle size, among other analysis for images associated with each hydrometeor.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗