Search NASASearch

DOE OSTI · 2871166

Evidence for large baryonic feedback at low and intermediate redshifts from kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich observations with ACT and DESI photometric galaxies

Hadzhiyska, B. [University of California; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; University of California] (ORCID:0000000223123121)·Ferraro, S. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; University of California]·Ried Guachalla, B. [Stanford University; Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology; SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory]·Schaan, E. [Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology; SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory]·Aguilar, J. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]·Ahlen, S. [Boston University]·Battaglia, N. [Cornell University]·Bond, J. R. [Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics]·Brooks, D. [University College London]·Calabrese, E. [Cardiff University]·Choi, S. K. [University of California]·Claybaugh, T. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]·Coulton, W. R. [Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge; University of Cambridge]·Dawson, K. [The University of Utah]·Devlin, M. [University of Pennsylvania]·Dey, B. [University of Pittsburgh]·Doel, P. [University College London]·Duivenvoorden, A. J. [Flatiron Institute; Princeton University]·Dunkley, J. [Princeton University; Princeton University]·Farren, G. S. [University of Cambridge; Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge]·Font-Ribera, A. [University College London; The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology]·Forero-Romero, J. E. [Universidad de los Andes; Universidad de los Andes]·Gallardo, P. A. [University of Chicago]·Gaztañaga, E. [Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC); University of Portsmouth; Institute of Space Sciences]·Gontcho Gontcho, S. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]·Gralla, M. [University of Arizona]·Le Guillou, L. [Sorbonne Université]·Gutierrez, G. [Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory]·Guy, J. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]·Hill, J. C. [Columbia University]·Hložek, R. [University of Toronto; University of Toronto]·Honscheid, K. [The Ohio State University; The Ohio State University; The Ohio State University]·Juneau, S. [NSF NOIRLab]·Kehoe, R. [Southern Methodist University]·Kisner, T. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]·Kremin, A. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]·Landriau, M. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]·Liu, R. H. [University of California]·Louis, T. [Université Paris-Saclay]·MacCrann, N. [University of Cambridge]·de Macorra, A. [Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México]·Madhavacheril, M. [University of Pennsylvania]·Manera, M. [Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology]·Meisner, A. [NSF NOIRLab]·Miquel, R. [Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology]·Moodley, K. [University of KwaZulu-Natal]·Moustakas, J. [Siena College]·Mroczkowski, T. [European Southern Observatory]·Naess, S. [University of Oslo]·Newman, J. [University of Pittsburgh]·Niemack, M. D. [Cornell University; Cornell University]·Niz, G. [Universidad de Guanajuato - DCI; Instituto Avanzado de Cosmología A. C.]·Page, L. [Princeton University]·Palanque-Delabrouille, N. [Université Paris-Saclay; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]·Partridge, B. [Haverford College]·Percival, W. J. [University of Waterloo; Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics; University of Waterloo]·Prada, F. [Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC)]·Qu, F. J. [University of Cambridge; Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge; Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology]·Rossi, G. [Sejong University]·Sanchez, E. [CIEMAT]·Schlegel, D. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]·Schubnell, M. [University of Michigan; University of Michigan]·Sherwin, B. [University of Cambridge]·Sehgal, N. [Stony Brook University]·Seo, H. [Ohio University]·Sifón, C. [Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso]·Spergel, D. [Flatiron Institute]·Sprayberry, D. [NSF NOIRLab]·Staggs, S. [Princeton University]·Tarlé, G. [University of Michigan]·Vargas, C. [Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile]·Vavagiakis, E. M. [Duke University; Cornell University]·Weaver, B. A. [NSF NOIRLab]·Wollack, E. J. [NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center]·Zhou, R. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory]·Zou, H. [Chinese Academy of Sciences]

Abstract

Recent advances in cosmological observations have provided an unprecedented opportunity to investigate the distribution of baryons relative to the underlying matter. In this work, we show that the gas is more extended than the dark matter, and the amount of baryonic feedback at $z \lesssim 1$ disfavors low-feedback models such as that of state-of-the-art hydrodynamical simulation IllustrisTNG compared with high-feedback models such as that of the original Illustris simulation. This has important implications for bridging the gap between theory and observations and understanding galaxy formation and evolution. Furthermore, a better grasp of the baryon-dark matter link is critical to future cosmological analyses, which are currently impeded by our limited knowledge of baryonic feedback. Here, we measure the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) effect from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT), stacked on the luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) imaging survey. This is the first analysis to use photometric redshifts for reconstructing galaxy velocities. Due to the large number of galaxies comprising the DESI imaging survey, this is the highest signal-to-noise stacked kSZ measurement to date: we detect the signal at 13$σ$, finding strong evidence that the gas is more spread out than the dark matter, as well as a preference for larger feedback compared to some commonly used state-of-the-art hydrodynamical simulations. Here, our work opens up the possibility of recalibrating large hydrodynamical simulations using the kSZ effect. In addition, our findings highlight the importance of properly accounting for baryonic feedback with future surveys such as LSST through direct probes such as the kSZ, and shed light on long-standing enigmas in astrophysics, such as the “missing baryon” problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hadzhiyska, B. [University of California; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; University of California] (ORCID:0000000223123121), Ferraro, S. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; University of California], Ried Guachalla, B. [Stanford University; Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology; SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory], Schaan, E. [Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology; SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory], Aguilar, J. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory], Ahlen, S. [Boston University], Battaglia, N. [Cornell University], Bond, J. R. [Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics], Brooks, D. [University College London], Calabrese, E. [Cardiff University], Choi, S. K. [University of California], Claybaugh, T. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory], Coulton, W. R. [Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge; University of Cambridge], Dawson, K. [The University of Utah], Devlin, M. [University of Pennsylvania], Dey, B. [University of Pittsburgh], Doel, P. [University College London], Duivenvoorden, A. J. [Flatiron Institute; Princeton University], Dunkley, J. [Princeton University; Princeton University], Farren, G. S. [University of Cambridge; Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge], Font-Ribera, A. [University College London; The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology], Forero-Romero, J. E. [Universidad de los Andes; Universidad de los Andes], Gallardo, P. A. [University of Chicago], Gaztañaga, E. [Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC); University of Portsmouth; Institute of Space Sciences], Gontcho Gontcho, S. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory], Gralla, M. [University of Arizona], Le Guillou, L. [Sorbonne Université], Gutierrez, G. [Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory], Guy, J. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory], Hill, J. C. [Columbia University], Hložek, R. [University of Toronto; University of Toronto], Honscheid, K. [The Ohio State University; The Ohio State University; The Ohio State University], Juneau, S. [NSF NOIRLab], Kehoe, R. [Southern Methodist University], Kisner, T. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory], Kremin, A. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory], Landriau, M. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory], Liu, R. H. [University of California], Louis, T. [Université Paris-Saclay], MacCrann, N. [University of Cambridge], de Macorra, A. [Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México], Madhavacheril, M. [University of Pennsylvania], Manera, M. [Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology], Meisner, A. [NSF NOIRLab], Miquel, R. [Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology], Moodley, K. [University of KwaZulu-Natal], Moustakas, J. [Siena College], Mroczkowski, T. [European Southern Observatory], Naess, S. [University of Oslo], Newman, J. [University of Pittsburgh], Niemack, M. D. [Cornell University; Cornell University], Niz, G. [Universidad de Guanajuato - DCI; Instituto Avanzado de Cosmología A. C.], Page, L. [Princeton University], Palanque-Delabrouille, N. [Université Paris-Saclay; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory], Partridge, B. [Haverford College], Percival, W. J. [University of Waterloo; Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics; University of Waterloo], Prada, F. [Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC)], Qu, F. J. [University of Cambridge; Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge; Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology], Rossi, G. [Sejong University], Sanchez, E. [CIEMAT], Schlegel, D. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory], Schubnell, M. [University of Michigan; University of Michigan], Sherwin, B. [University of Cambridge], Sehgal, N. [Stony Brook University], Seo, H. [Ohio University], Sifón, C. [Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso], Spergel, D. [Flatiron Institute], Sprayberry, D. [NSF NOIRLab], Staggs, S. [Princeton University], Tarlé, G. [University of Michigan], Vargas, C. [Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile], Vavagiakis, E. M. [Duke University; Cornell University], Weaver, B. A. [NSF NOIRLab], Wollack, E. J. [NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center], Zhou, R. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory], Zou, H. [Chinese Academy of Sciences]. 2025-10-06. Evidence for large baryonic feedback at low and intermediate redshifts from kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich observations with ACT and DESI photometric galaxies. https://doi.org/10.1103/kclp-x5j1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

Copacabana: a probabilistic membership assignment method for galaxy clusters

Cosmological analyses using galaxy clusters in optical/near-infrared photometric surveys require robust characterization of their galaxy content. Precisely determining which galaxies belong to a cluster is crucial. In this paper, we present the COlor Probabilistic Assignment of Clusters And BAyesiaN Analysis (Copacabana) algorithm. Copacabana computes membership probabilities for all galaxies within an aperture centred on the cluster using photometric redshifts, colours, and projected radial probability density functions. We use simulations to validate Copacabana and we show that it achieves up to 89 per cent membership accuracy with a mild dependence on photometric redshift uncertainties and choice of aperture size. We find that the precision of the photometric redshifts has the largest impact on the determination of the membership probabilities followed by the choice of the cluster aperture size. We also quantify how much these uncertainties in the membership probabilities affect the stellar mass–cluster mass scaling relation, a relation that directly impacts cosmology. Using the sum of the stellar masses weighted by membership probabilities (⁠μ * ⁠) as the observable, we find that Copacabana can reach an accuracy of 0.06 dex in the measurement of the scaling relation at low redshift for a Legacy Survey of Space and Time type survey. These results indicate the potential of Copacabana and μ * to be used in cosmological analyses of optically selected clusters in the future.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS

Dark energy survey year 3 results: likelihood-free, simulation-based w CDM inference with neural compression of weak-lensing map statistics

We present simulation-based cosmological wcold dark matter (wCDM) inference using dark energy survey year 3 weak-lensing maps, via neural data compression of weak-lensing map summary statistics: power spectra, peak counts, and direct map-level compression/inference with convolutional neural networks (CNN). Using simulation-based inference, also known as likelihood-free or implicit inference, we use forward-modelled mock data to estimate posterior probability distributions of unknown parameters. This approach allows all statistical assumptions and uncertainties to be propagated through the forward-modelled mock data; these include sky masks, non-Gaussian shape noise, shape measurement bias, source galaxy clustering, photometric redshift uncertainty, intrinsic galaxy alignments, non-Gaussian density fields, neutrinos, and non-linear summary statistics. We include a series of tests to validate our inference results. This paper also describes the Gower Street simulation suite: 791 full-sky pkdgrav3 dark matter simulations, with cosmological model parameters sampled with a mixed active-learning strategy, from which we construct over 3000 mock dark energy survey lensing data sets. For wCDM inference, for which we allow –1 < w < –$\frac{1}{3}$⁠, our most constraining result uses power spectra combined with map-level (CNN) inference. Using gravitational lensing data only, this map-level combination gives Ω m = 0.283$^{+0.020}_{–0.027}$⁠, S 8 = 0.804$^{+0.025}_{–0.017⁠}$, and w < –0.80 (with a 68 per cent credible interval); compared to the power spectrum inference, this is more than a factor of two improvement in dark energy parameter (Ω⁠ DE , w⁠) precision.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS

SQUID Readout of a High-$Q$ Superconducting $LC$ Resonator

We demonstrate the readout of a superconducting $LC$ resonator, with $Q \approx 2 \times 10^{6}$ at approximately 250 kHz, using a dc SQUID followed by a SQUID series-array amplifier readout chain. We find that $Q$ depends on the SQUID flux-bias point, increasing near the shallow-slope point of the SQUID modulation curve and decreasing near the steep-slope point, consistent with the previously observed SQUID damping effects. From this variation, we infer the SQUID effective input impedance. We further infer the effective temperature of the resonator circuit from the resonance peak in the noise spectrum and show that it also depends on the SQUID flux-bias point, suggesting a possible contribution from SQUID back-action noise. This system provides a working prototype for future experiments based on lumped-element resonators with SQUID readout, in particular low-mass axion searches within the DMRadio program.

FOS: Physical sciences