Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “docking”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

Space Shuttle Program Dual Docked Operations

- Dual Docked Operations (DDO) is the docking or undocking of a Russian Vehicle (RV) during Space Shuttle Orbiter/International Space Station (ISS) mated operations. - This paper and presentation summarizes the concept definition, studies, and analysis results generated by the Space Shuttle Program (SSP), ISS Program (ISSP), and Mission Operations Directorate for implementing DDO during mated Orbiter/ISS missions. [1] - Due to the ever-increasing visiting vehicle traffic to and from the ISS, it became apparent to both the ISSP and the SSP that there would arise occasions where conflicts between a visiting vehicle docking and/or undocking could overlap with a planned Space Shuttle launch and/or during mated Orbiter/ISS operations. - This potential conflict provided the genesis for evaluating risk mitigations to gain maximum flexibility for managing potential visiting vehicle traffic to and from the ISS and to maximize launch and landing opportunities for all visiting vehicles. - Reviews were conducted to assess the viability and readiness of the SSP to protect for DDO on any given mission and it was found to be t echnically feasible

Launch vehicles↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis IV Docking in Radiation Belt Charging Environment

NASA’s Artemis IV mission is planned to deliver the International Habitation Module (I-Hab) to the Gateway space station in lunar orbit. The I-Hab will be launched aboard the Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle as a co-manifested payload with the Orion spacecraft. After translunar injection begins, the Orion spacecraft will separate from the SLS Exploration Upper Stage (EUS) and then dock with the I-Hab to extract it from the EUS. Because of the altitude, orientation, and time for this to occur, the vehicle-to-vehicle potential between the I-Hab/EUS vehicle and Orion spacecraft could exceed several thousand volts. The docking of these two spacecrafts with such large differential potentials presents a challenge for the vehicles. This presentation describes the space environments at the docking altitude, the calculated vehicle-to-vehicle potential, and the possible impacts of the resulting voltage and current transients occurring at first contact. Additionally, possible risk mitigation tests to demonstrate compatibility with the transient current and voltages will be presented.

Matthew Mccollum↗
NASA NTRS1962

RENDEZVOUS AND DOCKING TECHNIQUES

To implement the primary space mission of this decade – manned lunar exploration -- the operational assistance of rendezvous and docking is being considered as an alternative to possible problems in obtaining a boost vehicle capable of direct flight. This paper concentrates on the mechanization of the rendezvous and docking phase of such a lunar mission. As indicated in previous papers, rendezvous can take place in either an earth or lunar orbit (or on the lunar surface); it can involve the mating of stages, transfer of fuel, or the return of a shuttle to a “mother” ship; direct ascent or parking orbits can be used; the orbits can be circular or more general ellipses; finally, either or both of the spacecraft can participate in the rendezvous maneuvers. Since there is no intent here to discuss the pros and cons of each approach or to cover all possible mission profiles, guidance schemes and hardware configurations, one particular profile has been selected to display the significant features of most rendezvous missions. In many respects, rendezvous is less difficult than aircraft interception since the target is friendly and there is no severe time constraint. The latter feature allows considerable freedom of design especially with the great versatility of a human in the loop. This remains true even for a purely automatic mode. Perhaps the largest design problem concerns the selection of the mission to be implemented followed by the optimization or systems engineering of a mechanization from the multitude of possible schemes and techniques. A most important factor in the optimization is that of reliability and the redundancy, alternate or backup modes, etc., associated with the approach. While a primary system can be rather easily mechanized with modest equipment requirements, reliability considerations will result in additional hardware, tighter specifications and more safety factors (e. g., propellant margin). This is a very complex area and will only briefly be mentioned in the following discussion.

Rendezvous↗
NASA NTRS2018

Capture Latch Assembly for the NASA Docking System

Final Paper and not the abstract is attached. a summary of the Design, Development, and Qualification of the Capture Latch Assembly (CLA) for the NASA Docking System Block 1 (NDSB1). The CLA is an integral part of the Soft Capture System (SCS) of the NDSB1, serving the purpose of connecting the mating SCS Rings of two docking vehicles. The paper will present an overview of the function of the CLA and its basic concept of operations, including a summary of the major components of the CLA. The development, qualification, and production of the CLA will then be described. Particular focus will be provided on two major issues that occurred during production and qualification of the CLA. The first issue was failures of the CLA Motor (CLM) during acceptance testing (AT). The failures of the CLM were ultimately determined to be due to design defects and manufacturing errors in the motor commutation sensor assembly. The second issue was failure of the secondary release mechanism, or Contingency Capture Latch Release (CCLR) mechanism during development and qualification testing. The CCLR failures were found to be a result of excess free play in the release mechanism, resulting in wear leading to galling inside the release mechanism. An overview of each failure will be provided, along with a summary of the failure investigation and recovery process. Finally, Lessons Learned from each of the major issues and the overall development of the Capture Latch will be presented.

Capture Latch↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Modeling of a Stewart Platform for Analyzing One Directional Dynamics for Spacecraft Docking Operations

A one-directional dynamic model of a Stewart Platform was developed to assist NASA in analyzing the dynamic response in spacecraft docking operations. A simplified mechanical drawing was created, capturing the physical structure's main features. A simplified schematic diagram was developed in a lumped mass model from the mechanical drawing. Three differential equations were derived according to the schematic diagram. A Simulink diagram was created using MATLAB to represent the three equations. System parameters, including spring constants and masses, are derived in detail from the physical system. The model can be used for further analysis via computer simulation in predicting dynamic response in its main docking direction, i.e., up-and-down motion.

Stewart Platform↗
NASA NTRS1970

The Apollo Docking System

The Apollo docking system is the means by which the Apollo command and service modules and the lunar module are connected and disconnected during a lunar-landing mission. The system incorporates a CSM probe assembly that mates with a drogue assembly on the LM. Twelve automatic latches mounted on the CSM docking ring provide for structural integrity between the vehicles and for tunnel sealing during crew transfer. A functional description of the flight hardware and the alternate concepts that were evaluated to determine the system best suited to Apollo requirements are presented.

Kenneth A Bloom↗
NASA NTRS1972

Docking devices for Soyuz-type spacecraft

Two docking device designs for Soyuz-type spacecraft are compared. The first was flight tested successfully; the second achieves rigid and exact joining of two spacecraft, while incorporating changes to allow for the intravehicular transfer of crew members. The main functions of the docking device are considered, with the means by which they are accomplished, and measures for increasing its reliability and flexibility in service are noted.

V. S. Syromyatnikov↗
NASA NTRS1972

Dynamic testing of docking system hardware

Extensive dynamic testing was conducted to verify the flight readiness of the Apollo docking hardware. Testing was performed on a unique six degree-of-freedom motion simulator controlled by a computer that calculated the associated spacecraft motions. The test system and the results obtained by subjecting flight-type docking hardware to actual impact loads and resultant spacecraft dynamics are described.

Dorland, W. D.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Engineering principles to assure compatible docking between future spacecraft of USA and USSR

An androgynous peripheral type docking mechanism concept selected by the U.S. and the USSR is described. The rationale supporting the selection of the concept, the mechanical principles inherent to the concept, and the probable nature of future designs stemming from the concept are discussed. Operational situations prior to docking, impact conditions, energy absorption, and structural joining of two spacecraft are examined.

Johnson, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Laser space rendezvous and docking tradeoff

A spaceborne laser radar (LADAR) was configured to meet the requirements for rendezvous and docking with a cooperative object in synchronous orbit. The LADAR, configurated using existing pulsed CO2 laser technology and a 1980 system technology baseline, is well suited for the envisioned space tug missions. The performance of a family of candidate LADARS was analyzed. Tradeoff studies as a function of size, weight, and power consumption were carried out for maximum ranges of 50, 100, 200, and 300 nautical miles. The investigation supports the original contention that a rendezvous and docking LADAR can be constructed to offer a cost effective and reliable solution to the envisioned space missions. In fact, the CO2 ladar system offers distinct advantages over other candidate systems.

Adelman, S.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Unmanned docking

An algorithm is developed which effects unmanned docking of two space vehicles. The docking is controlled by an onboard computer and sensor. Control laws are expressed in two phase-plane trajectories such that modest computer load results. Simulation reveals time-fuel trades and effects of orbit, noise, etc.

Pace, M.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Space Tug Docking Study. Volume 1: Executive Summary

Results of a detailed systems analysis of the entire rendezvous and docking operation to be performed by the all-up space tug are presented. Specific areas investigated include: generating of operational requirements and a data base of candidate operational techniques and subsystem mechanizations; selection and ranking of integrated system designs capable of meeting the requirements generated; and definition of this simulation/demonstration program required to select and prove the most effective manual, autonomous, and hybrid rendezvous and docking systems.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1976

Apollo-Soyuz test project docking system

The United States and Soviet Union in July 1975 successfully completed a joint space mission utilizing each country's spacecraft and the compatible docking system designed and fabricated by each country. The compatible docking system is described, along with the extensive research, development, and testing leading up to the successful mission. It also describes the formulation and implementation of methods for breaking the language barrier, bridging the extensive distances for communication and travel, and adjusting to each country's different culture during the three-year development program.

Swan, W. L., Jr.↗