Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Advanced Reactor”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11

Work Domain Analysis Methodology for Development of Operational Concepts for Advanced Reactors

This report describes a methodology to conduct a Work Domain Analysis in preparation for the development of operational concepts for new plants. This method has been adapted from the classical method described in the literature in order to better deal with the uncertainty and incomplete information typical of first-of-a-kind designs. The report outlines the strategy for undertaking a Work Domain Analysis of a new nuclear power plant and the methods to be used in the development of the various phases of the analysis. Basic principles are described to the extent necessary to explain why and how the classical method was adapted to make it suitable as a tool for the preparation of operational concepts for a new nuclear power plant. Practical examples are provided of the systematic application of the method and the various presentation formats in the operational analysis of advanced reactors.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

A Revised Capsule Design for the Accelerated Testing of Advanced Reactor Fuels

Testing of fast reactor fuel is currently challenging because of the thermal neutron spectrum of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) and the fact that ATR coolant is substantially below typical temperatures found in liquid metal-cooled fast reactors. Despite these issues, since 2003 the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has successfully tested a variety of metallic, oxide, and nitride fuels for fast reactor applications. There are, however, opportunities to improve the experiments so that the time required to reach a desired burnup can be reduced, and so the sensitivity of the experiments to fabrication tolerances can be minimized. A revised capsule design exploits the use of smaller diameter rodlets to increase power densities and correspondingly reduce the irradiation time required to reach high burnup. Thermal and nuclear analyses indicate that the time to reach 30at% burnup could be reduced from about 12 years to approximately 2-3 years if the fuel diameter is reduced by one-half and to around 1-2 years if the diameter is reduced by one-third. In addition, reducing fuel diameter improves the radial power distribution in the fuel without the use of cadmium shrouding. This observation opens up the possibility of testing advanced reactor fuel systems in Small I locations in the ATR where there is substantial unused capacity. Although not directly tied to a revised capsule design, post-irradiation furnace testing is proposed to provide time-to-failure data that will be helpful in the benchmarking of fuel performance models and in assessing the performance of new fuel designs relative to more standard fast reactor fuel systems. In this paradigm, ATR irradiation experiments will be viewed more as preparation for furnace testing than as experiments that exist in isolation. An added benefit to furnace testing is that uncertainties in temperatures will significantly be reduced relative to non-instrumented capsules in the ATR. The time and cost in developing this experimental capability is expected to be reduced considerably because of the availability of the blister anneal furnace used by the HPRR program. A key issue in the experiment approach is the potential for non-prototypical rodlet dimensions to influence the observed performance of a given fuel design. For example, a qualitative assessment indicates that the effects of fuel-cladding chemical interactions during furnace testing might be more pronounced in reduced diameter rodlets simply because thinner cladding would be more sensitive to a given depth of fission product penetration. In a traditional empirically-driven approach to fuel qualification, any change from prototypical behavior is undesirable because the resulting data cannot easily be assimilated into a statistical correlation. However, in the current approach, systematic variations in fuel diameter provide the opportunity to benchmark fuel performance models over a wider range of parameter space, which in turn is expected to improve understanding and result in better, more physically based models in the long term.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Build-to-Replace Strategy to Reduce Operations and Maintenance Costs for Advanced Reactors

This paper targets the reduction of fixed operations and maintenance (O&M) costs for advanced reactor (AR) designs. This goal will be severely constrained if the underlying assumptions of O&M approaches and practices are not questioned and reexamined, especially today when changes can be implemented effectively and efficiently. Achieving a reduction in AR O&M costs requires a completely new way of thinking -a paradigm shift- not through incremental, technology-focused approaches alone. Here, we address this challenge by evaluating the impact of moving to a shorter design life for major structures, systems, and components and shorter, more predictable refurbishment cycles as modeled by the commercial airline industry: the build-to-replace approach. This paper provides a brief overview of this different mindset to O&M applied to ARs and it provided a set of analytical tools based on multi-objective optimization to identify the benefits of such an approach. In conclusion, we provide a direct example analysis of a build-to-replace scenario by identifying and evaluating scenarios for reduced system and component lifetimes and associated replacement and refurbishment schedules to evaluate impacts on O&M costs and other lifecycle elements, such as structure, system, and component reliability.

97 - MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Modeling and Simulation to Support Current and Advanced Reactors : Thermal Hydraulics

Presentation on thermohydraulic modeling and simulation capabilities in support of current and advanced reactors. The presentation includes information on the capabilities of RELAP5-3D, MOOSE and the experimental testbed for this purpose. This presentation is intended for a Taiwan delegation that will be visiting INL in August 2024.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Options for Achieving Cost Reduction in Advanced Reactors through Open Architecture

A key contributor to high capital costs and schedule overruns for new nuclear power plants is lack of standardization, driven by site-specific customization and construction of multiple designs by competing vendors rather than commitment to a single standardized program. While advanced reactor vendors typically individually target repeat construction of standardized units, the many competing designs could exacerbate the problem. “Open Architecture”, the open specification of requirements and interfaces for structures, systems and components (SSCs), has been proposed as a means of promoting standardization, by facilitating existing non-nuclear suppliers to enter the industry and/or allowing SSCs to be configured for more than one reactor within the same technology type. Contracting mechanisms that facilitate information sharing and alignment of incentives between stakeholders may complement such an approach. A preliminary scheme is presented for selection of SSCs for which such strategies could be adopted, based on a vendor make/buy decision model and stakeholder interviews. SSCs are categorized according to number of suppliers and their contribution to the reactor’s competitive edge. SSCs with many potential suppliers and a high contribution to competitive edge may be attractive for widening the supply chain via open specification of system requirements and interfaces, e.g., SSCs in the power island. SSCs with few suppliers and low contribution to competitive edge may be potential avenues for common system specification between vendors, e.g., some of the auxiliary SSCs. Potential cost reductions from such strategies will depend upon the size of the build program and the reactor type.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Advanced Reactors Integrated Energy System: Thermal Energy Storage Island Design

The main topic of this research is integrated energy systems (IES) designed for pairing industrial thermal energy loads with advanced reactors (ARs). The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Crosscutting Technology Development IES program and the National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC) are seeking to develop, design, and construct an AR-IES demonstration platform that couples the thermal output from an AR operating at the INL/NRIC Demonstration of Microreactor Experiments (DOME) test bed in the Experimental Breeder II dome to a variable capacity load emulator (i.e., air-cooled radiator) and sensible thermal energy storage (TES) via a molten salt thermal energy transfer fluid. In the rapidly evolving landscape of energy supply and distribution, flexibility has emerged as a prized attribute, surpassing the traditional notions of stability and baseload generation capability. This shift in priorities is particularly evident in the context of nuclear power plants (NPPs), where adaptability over constant output is becoming more important. As our energy infrastructure and resources embraces the rise of distributed energy generation, the inherent variability in net demand continues to grow. Moreover, the use of nuclear energy as a source of heat for decarbonizing the industrial sector is becoming a very pressing topic. In such environment, advanced NPPs are poised to enter a more competitive energy market, delivering both, flexible electricity and heat. This shift motivates the exploration of TES systems, designed to empower NPPs with nimble responsiveness to market fluctuations, flexible heat delivery capabilities, and redefine their role in the energy field. TES systems offer the unique advantage of storing nuclear energy in its original form as heat, thereby affording unparalleled flexibility in its subsequent utilization.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Human Factors for Advanced Reactors

Existing light water reactors in the U.S. are primarily large baseload electricity generating facilities. The concept of operations for these plants remains largely unchanged since the advent of commercial nuclear power—the main control room serves as the hub of plant activities and is staffed with multiple licensed operators who work in tandem under the shift supervisor, and staff such as field workers support the control room remotely. While newer plants have brought the advent of digital human-machine interfaces to replace earlier analog and mechanical instrumentation and controls, much of the control process remains unchanged and manual. It is simply a newer version of legacy concepts. Advanced reactors potentially bring considerable changes to the size, fuel type, automation, and staffing of nuclear power plants, necessitating a fundamental shift not just from analog to digital, but further from human to automation, from onsite to remote, from control to monitoring, and from many to few operators. Despite this multitude of parallel evolutions in reactor designs, many of the vendors developing the next generation of reactors represent smaller research and development enterprises. It is therefore not feasible to address all aspects of plant design at the same time. In particular, the competing design aspects of new reactors present a significant challenge to the development of robust and human factored systems at the plant. As vendors develop new reactor designs, much of the early focus is naturally on the fuel and reactor system technology. Looming behind these early advances is the daunting prospect of first-of-a-kind control concepts that have not yet been developed or validated. A failure to address the human element of reactor design early will lead to missed opportunities. The quickest development process is the replication of existing concepts of operations at legacy plants, even when such systems were long ago surpassed by better human-machine technologies outside the nuclear industry. Conversely, attempting to undertake novel concepts of operations late in the design life cycle of a plant could result in protracted development efforts and delays in licensing and deployment. This does not have to happen, and it is imperative that human factors be considered now, early in the design of new reactors.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

MHD Analysis of Dual-Coolant Lead-Lithium Blanket for Spherical Tokamak Advanced Reactor

The tritium breeding blanket is vital for future fusion power plants, with the Spherical Tokamak Advanced Reactor (STAR) project highlighting the dual-coolant lead-lithium (DCLL) design. The DCLL blanket performs shielding, energy exhaust, and tritium breeding using a lead-lithium alloy , with lithium as the breeder and lead as the neutron multiplier. It also serves as the primary coolant, with helium providing supplemental cooling. Reduced-activation ferritic/martensitic steel is used for the blanket structure. Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) phenomena influence the liquid metal flow in a magnetic field, affecting heat transfer in the breeder affected by energetic neutrons. Understanding key flow parameters in such conditions is critical for efficient DCLL design. This study uses three-dimensional thermofluid MHD analysis with ANSYS CFX software, modified at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, to simulate high Hartmann flows. The neutronics code MCNP, coupled with plasma equilibrium, provides heat source distribution. In conclusion, we examine electromagnetic interactions in adjacent fluid domains and analyze the magnetic field’s impact on flow distribution in the inboard and outboard blanket layout, using detailed mesh generation for accurate results.

DCLL↗

Advanced Reactor Technology Program Molten Salt Reactor Campaign FY 2018 Summary

In FY 2018, the inaugural Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) Campaign was begun with the US Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Reactor Technology (ART) program. The campaign is led out of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) under the direction of Lou Qualls, who serves as the national technical director for the program. The campaign is a revival and refocusing of a significant DOE research program from the 1950’s, 1960’s and 1970’s, which culminated in the operation of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment. The principal objectives of the campaign’s first year were to study and define the current condition of the technology, identify and prioritize technology gaps, and establish a national team of experts to collaboratively address the technical needs. The highest-level objective of the campaign is to facilitate the development and near-term market deployment of MSRs in conjunction with industry partners.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Design and Prototyping of Advanced Control Systems for Advanced Reactors Operating in the Future Electric Grid (Final Report)

Despite its significant advantages as a baseload, low-carbon energy source, the U.S. nuclear power industry has faced increasing difficulties in maintaining economic competitiveness in a rapidly evolving energy market. The economic conditions faced by the current fleet of nuclear power plants (NPPs) in the U.S. deregulated electricity market require a concerted effort to mitigate specific cost factors. Many units are struggling to stay competitive, and some premature shutdowns have occurred. Besides, in response to the large penetration of renewable energy sources, the role of nuclear power plants as pure baseload units needs to be reconsidered. Based on these experiences, operational flexibility is considered a fundamental requirement for the next generation of nuclear reactors to be competitive in the future energy market. The deployment of advanced reactors capable of operating within a new power grid paradigm, known as the Integrated Energy System (IES) was investigated. This approach combines new reactor designs with Thermal Energy Storage (TES) technologies, allowing the nuclear reactor to maintain a steady power output without the need for constant adjustments in response to load demand fluctuations. With this configuration, the reactor operates as a baseload unit, experiencing only very gradual power transients, while the energy storage facility within the power conversion cycle acts as a peaking unit.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Evaluating Nuclear Forensic Signatures for Advanced Reactor Deployment: A Research Priority Assessment

The development and deployment of a new generation of nuclear reactors necessitates a thorough evaluation of techniques used to characterize nuclear materials for nuclear forensic applications. Advanced fuels proposed for use in these reactors present both challenges and opportunities for the nuclear forensic field. Many efforts in pre-detonation nuclear forensics are currently focused on the analysis of uranium oxides, uranium ore concentrates, and fuel pellets since these materials have historically been found outside of regulatory control. The increasing use of TRISO particles, metal fuels, molten fuel salts, and novel ceramic fuels will require an expansion of the current nuclear forensic suite of signatures to accommodate the different physical dimensions, chemical compositions, and material properties of these advanced fuel forms. In this work, a semi-quantitative priority scoring system is introduced to identify the order in which the nuclear forensics community should pursue research and development on material signatures for advanced reactor designs. This scoring system was applied to propose the following priority ranking of six major advanced reactor categories: (1) molten salt reactor (MSR), (2) liquid metal-cooled reactor (LMR), (3) very-high-temperature reactor (VHTR), (4) fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactor (FHR), (5) gas-cooled fast reactor (GFR), and (6) supercritical water-cooled reactor (SWCR).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Overview of Advanced Reactor Simulation Capabilities to Support Demonstrations

The Virtual Test Bed (VTB) was established to support the deployment of advanced reactors by facilitating the use of state-of-the-art modeling and simulation capabilities. These tools are able to solve previously prohibitive challenge problems in greater levels of fidelity and in a multi-physics framework. A VTB repository was recently set up to host models for a wide variety of reactor types and using a range of NEAMS-developed software. Table I summarizes the different capabilities already available in the repository and up-and-coming near/long term ones. The repository currently hosts models for a wide variety of reactor types, including High-Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors (HTGR), Sodium Fast Reactors (SFR), Fluoride salt cooled High-temperature Reactors (FHR), Molten Salt Reactors (MSR), and Heat-Pipe Microreactors (HP-MR). It should be noted that work is ongoing for all of the models and each example problem is at a different state of maturity.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Sensor Qualification for the Development of Advanced Reactors

A temperature sensor qualification device is undergoing development and testing in order to qualify temperature sensors for advanced reactor metrology applications. This device will provide National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) traceable performance testing of temperature sensors while under the high radiation environments experienced while in-core. This is completed by utilizing retractable sensors which transfer the measurements from ex-core to in-core sensors. A detailed discussion of the uncertainty propagation associated with this comparative process is provided. Experimental testing of the temperature distribution occurring in the device has begun and is reported on. It is pertinent to minimize this temperature distribution to prevent variation in sensor measurements. This variation will be indistinguishable from sensor drift for in-pile applications and would result in unnecessarily conservative uncertainty bounds.

46 - INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AN↗

Build-To-Replace Strategy to Reduce O&M Costs of Advanced Reactors

This paper targets the goal of reducing fixed operations and maintenance (O&M) costs to $2/MWh for advanced reactor (AR) designs, an order of magnitude reduction from current nuclear fleets. Such goal will be severely constrained if the underlying assumptions of O&M approaches and practices are not questioned and reexamined, especially today when changes can be implemented effectively and efficiently. Achieving a 90% reduction in AR O&M costs requires a completely new way of thinking – a paradigm shift – not through incremental, technology-focused approaches alone. Here, we address this challenge by evaluating the impact of moving to shorter design life for major structures, systems and components (SSCs) and shorter, more predictable refurbishment cycles as modeled by the commercial airline industry. This paper provides a brief overview of this different mindset to O&M applied to ARs: the build-to-replace approach. We provide a direct example of analysis of a build-to-replace scenario by identifying and evaluating scenarios for reduced system and component lifetimes and associated replacement and refurbishment schedules to evaluate impacts on O&M costs and other lifecycle elements such as SSC reliability.

97 - MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Status Report on Advanced Reactor Fuels Hot Cell Furnace Testing

The Advanced Fuels Campaign is developing a series of out-of-pile steady state furnace tests on irradiated nuclear fuel pins in order to better characterize and understand isolated fuel performance phenomena. These tests will also provide valuable datasets for validation and improvement of modelling and simulation tools. The Blister Anneal Furnace (BAF) in the INL Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF) has been identified as the ideal location for these tests, and, in order to perform them, a new fixture for the BAF has been designed and commissioned. This report summarizes the objectives, design, characteristics and status of this fixture. The design was finalized, materials procured and tested, and the assembly fixture is now fully fabricated in the mock-up shop of the Fuel Conditioning Facility (FCF) at MFC.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Horizontal Split Table Conceptual Design for Validation of Nuclear Data used in Advanced Reactors [Slides]

This presentation discusses a methodology that was developed to create conceptual designs of benchmark critical experiments for advanced reactors and nuclear data testing. A first concept that was explored was a pebble-bed high-temperature gas cooled reactor, based on the HTR-10 reactor. The very high correlation is a proof of concept that the design is similar to the application, and performing such critical experiments would help nuclear data testing and validation. Other concepts could be explored if needed, such as a molten-salt reactor, a sodium-cooled fast reactor, or heat pipe reactors/microreactor.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Advanced Reactor Siting Policy Considerations

This report describes considerations for and challenges to revising the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) guidance regarding population for siting an advanced reactor. Current regulations in 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 100, Reactor Site Criteria, and guidance support in Regulatory Guide (RG) 4.7, Revision 3, General Site Suitability Criteria for Nuclear Power Stations, are focused on large light water reactors (LWRs), addressing the distance that a nuclear reactor should be sited from a densely populated center. This report analyzes the alternatives to using a formula distance as the primary figure of merit for siting small modular reactors (SMRs) or non-light water reactors (non-LWRs). Some reactor vendors use a business plan that sites reactors close to an industrial partner to supply heat or to back-fit a reactor at a fossil plant site to take advantage of existing infrastructure. Factors such as smaller source terms (fission product release to the environment), passive safety systems, advances in barrier technology, advances in simulation and modeling, and improved understanding of societal risk may allow for siting these types of reactors closer to densely populated centers than has historically been accepted for large LWRs.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗