Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lithium plating”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14

A novel polymeric lithicone coating for superior lithium metal anodes

Lithium metal (Li) is commonly regarded as the “holy grail” of rechargeable batteries and can serve as anodes for constituting various high-energy lithium metal batteries (LMBs). However, it suffers from two notorious issues: (1) continuous formation of inhomogeneous solid electrolyte interphase and (2) Li dendritic growth. Here, in this study, we developed a novel polymeric lithicone via a new molecular layer deposition (MLD) process, using lithium tert-butoxide (LTB) and hydroquinone (HQ) as precursors. We revealed that such an MLD process enabled the resultant LiHQ to grow linearly in a highly controllable and cyclic mode at a growth rate of 4 Å cycle −1 . Furthermore, its low process deposition temperature of 150 °C made it possible to practice high-quality coatings over Li anodes directly. We demonstrated that, very compellingly, this LiHQ coating could protect Li anodes from corrosion and dendritic growth. As a consequence, this LiHQ coating has enabled Li||Li symmetric cells an extremely long cyclability up to 8000 Li-plating/stripping cycles without failure. More excitingly, we demonstrated that, coupled with LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cathodes, the LiHQ-modified Li anodes could help the resultant Li||NMC811 realize a much better capacity retention and much longer cyclability. Thus, this study represents a strategic route for developing commercializeable LMBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A low-cost, fluorine-free electrolyte for improved sodium batteries

Sodium batteries are an attractive alternative to lithium-ion technologies due to sodium’s lower cost and natural abundance—over 1,000 times greater than lithium, comprising approximately 2.4% of the Earth’s crust. However, most current electrolytes rely on fluorine-containing components, which raise economic and environmental concerns. This study explores fluorine-free, borate-based electrolytes that offer improved cycling stability and significant cost and sustainability benefits. We demonstrate stable sodium metal stripping and plating on aluminum foil, enabling anode-free cell configurations with over 50% capacity retention after 700 cycles. Spectroscopic and electrochemical analyses reveal the effects of solvents and salt composition on solvation, ionic conductivity, and oxidative stability. In full-cell configurations, the fluorine-free electrolyte maintains more than 98% capacity retention after 400 cycles. Furthermore, these findings represent a critical step toward the development of cost-effective, environmentally friendly, and high-performance sodium battery systems suitable for future electrification.

anode-free sodium batteries↗

Crystal structures of polymerized lithium chloride and dimethyl sulfoxide in the form of {2LiCl·3DMSO} n and {LiCl·DMSO} n

Two novel LiCl·DMSO polymer structures were created by combining dry LiCl salt with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), namely, catena-poly[[chlorido­lithium(I)]-μ-(dimethyl sulfoxide)-κ 2 O:O-[chlorido­lithium(I)]-di-μ-(dimethyl sulfoxide)-κ 4 O:O], [Li 2 Cl 2 (C 2 H 6 OS) 3 ]n, and catena-poly[lithium(I)-μ-chlorido-μ-(dimethyl sulfoxide)-κ 2 O:O], [LiCl(C 2 H 6 OS)]n. The initial synthesized phase had very small block-shaped crystals (<0.08 mm) with monoclinic symmetry and a 2 LiCl: 3 DMSO ratio. As the solution evaporated, a second phase formed with a plate-shaped crystal morphology. After about 20 minutes, large (>0.20 mm) octa­hedron-shaped crystals formed. The plate crystals and the octa­hedron crystals are the same tetra­gonal structure with a 1 LiCl: 1 DMSO ratio. These structures are reported and compared to other known LiCl·solvent compounds.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Pressure effects on lithium anode/nickel-manganese-cobalt oxide cathode pouch cells through fixture design

Applying external pressure to a pouch cell results in improved performance, implicating systems-level design of batteries. Here, different formats and amounts of external pressure to Li-Li x Ni 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (Li-NMC811) pouch cells were studied under lean electrolyte conditions. Due to the more uniform lithium plating/stripping, a constant gap fixture that retains the distance of the frame during cycling performed greater than a constant pressure fixture that retains applied pressure to the cell. In addition, the use of flexible foam in a constant gap fixture revealed enhanced cycle life at 10 psi; however, at 30 psi, the use of a rigid plate extended cycle life to over 250 cycles, while the foam severely shortened cycle life. This discrepancy with pressure was proven to be driven by stress distribution on cell components. The failure mechanisms and the effects of pressure fixture design on cell components were unveiled, shedding light on improving high-energy battery performance through at-scale fixture design.

25 - ENERGY STORAGE↗

Design Principles of Single Atoms on Carbons for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

The study of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries has generated various rationally designed cathodes and modified separators. However, the shuttle of soluble lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and the sluggish kinetics of transformation of LiPSs to Li2S2/Li2S still hinder the achievement of long-life cycling and high-rate of Li-S batteries. Even though several kinds of nanocatalysts have been studied, the catalytic effects for Li-S batteries are not ideal. Single atoms (SAs) with high surface free energy are found to serve as both anchoring and electrocatalytic centers for LiPSs. Furthermore, atomically dispersed metal catalyst on carbon provide conductive and flexible host for dielectric sulfur. Moreover, SAs as the uniform lithiophilic sites can reduce the nucleation overpotential and ensure uniformly plating of Li. In this review, the latest strategies for preparation of SAs supported on carbons are provided on the application of Li-S batteries, including cathode, modified separator and Li metal anode. In addition, it also discusses how SAs with high catalytic activity can help build better Li-S batteries and the design principles for SAs. Finally, the future directions of SAs in energy storage applications is proposed.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A Comprehensive Numerical and Experimental Study for the Passive Thermal Management in Battery Modules and Packs

Cooling plates in battery packs of electric vehicles play critical roles in passive thermal management systems to reduce risks of catastrophic thermal runaway. In this work, a series of numerical simulations and experiments are carried out to unveil the role of cooling plates (both between cells and a bottom plate parallel to the cell stack) on the thermal behavior of battery modules and packs under nail penetrations. First, we investigated the role of side cooling plates on the thermal runaway propagation mitigation in battery modules (1S3P) and packs (3S3P) by varying the key parameters of the side cooling plates, such as plate thicknesses, thermal contact resistances, and materials. Then, three important factors for passive thermal management systems are identified: (i) thermal mass of side cooling plates, (ii) interfacial thermal contact resistances, and (iii) the effective heat transfer coefficients at exterior surfaces. The roles of bottom cooling plates on thermal runaway propagation mitigation in 1S3P and 1S5P battery modules are numerically investigated by comparing the thermal behavior of the modules with only side cooling plates and with both side and bottom cooling plates.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Efficient Lithium Metal Cycling over a Wide Range of Pressures from an Anion-Derived Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Framework

Advanced electrolytes were developed to improve the cyclability of lithium (Li) metal anodes, yet their working mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we study the Li cycling performance under different pressures in a 1 M Li bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide/fluorinated 1,4-dimethoxybutane electrolyte. A consistently long cycle life is achieved over a wide range of pressures (30–600 psi). We find that this is due to a completely different Li plating mode with more favorable deposition morphologies compared to that in a conventional carbonate electrolyte, which exhibits increasing cycle stability with increased pressure. We show that this is enabled by the properties of an anion-derived residual solid-electrolyte interphase (rSEI) framework on the electrode surface, an undercharacterized structure with profound implications for Li metal cycling. This anion-derived rSEI chemistry is likely the key to a prolonged cycle life of Li metal batteries and should be vigorously addressed in future electrolyte designs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Heterogeneous Solid Electrolyte Interphase Interactions Dictate Interface Instability in Sodium Metal Electrodes

Sodium (Na) metal batteries have attracted recent attention due to their low cost and high abundance of Na. However, the advancement of Na metal batteries is impeded due to key challenges such as dendrite growth, solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) fracture, and low Coulombic efficiency. This study examines the coupled electro‐chemo‐mechanical interactions governing the electrodeposition stability and morphological evolution at the Na/electrolyte interface. The SEI heterogeneities influence transport and reaction kinetics leading to the formation of current and stress hotspots during Na plating. Further, it is demonstrated that the heterogeneity‐induced Na metal evolution and its influence on the stress distribution critically affect the mechanical overpotential, contributing to a faster SEI failure. The analysis reveals three distinct failure mechanisms—mechanical, transport, and kinetic—that govern the onset of instabilities at the interface. Finally, a comprehensive comparative study of SEI failure in Na and lithium (Li) metal anodes illustrates that the electrochemical and mechanical characteristics of the SEI are crucial in tailoring the anode morphology and interface stability. This work delineates mechanistic stability regimes cognizant of the SEI attributes and underlying failure modes and offers important guidelines for the design of artificial SEI layers for stable Na metal electrodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Establishing the Stability of Cross-Linked Poly(ethylene oxide) Blended with Poly(pentyl malonate) against Lithium Metal Anodes

This work focuses on an electrolyte obtained by infusing linear poly(pentyl malonate) (PPM) chains into cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). A lithium salt is added to enable ion transport. Obtaining this electrolyte is only possible because PPM is miscible with PEO irrespective of salt concentration. The properties of this electrolyte are compared against two benchmarks: an electrolyte obtained by infusing linear PEO into cross-linked PEO and cross-linked PEO with no added linear polymer. Measurements of storage moduli and ion transport efficacies are found to be similar across the three electrolytes, suggesting similar stability behavior against lithium metal anodes, based on current theoretical models. Instead, the PPM infused electrolyte outperforms the other two electrolytes. In the cycling tests, the current supported by the PPM infused electrolyte was a factor of 20 higher than that of the PEO infused electrolyte and a factor of 4 higher than that of the cross-linked PEO electrolyte. In the unidirectional plating experiments, the other two electrolytes fail after about 4 h or less, while the PPM containing electrolyte did not fail during the 140 h testing period. Insight into the nature of failure modes was obtained using synchrotron hard X-ray microtomography.

Gido, Lily [University of California, Berkeley]↗

Reaction Current Heterogeneity at the Interface between a Lithium Electrode and Polymer/Ceramic Composite Electrolytes

Although lithium metal anodes are expected to increase the energy density of next-generation batteries, dendrite growth during charge remains a major bottleneck preventing widespread implementation. Composite solid electrolytes with ceramic particles embedded in a polymer matrix have the potential to prevent dendrites owing to the higher mechanical stiffness while also possessing the flexibility to maintain contact with the electrode. However, microscopically, the different mechanical and electrochemical properties of the polymer and ceramic domains can cause inhomogeneous charge transfer at the Li/electrolyte interface, which can lead to nonuniform Li deposition and propagation of dendrites. Here, we computationally examine the coupled electrochemical, transport, and mechanical processes at the interface to determine the propensity for dendrite formation and possible approaches to mitigate this issue. Predictions of two possible microstructures at the interface, namely, (i) where both the polymer and ceramic come in contact with Li metal and (ii) when only the polymer comes in contact with Li metal, suggest that the former has a greater tendency for nonuniform plating. In addition, predictions suggest that minimizing the interfacial resistance between polymers and ceramics and incorporating interlayers between the electrode and electrolyte help mitigate current heterogeneity. In conclusion, these predictions provide guidance for experimental approaches to prevent dendrites in composite electrolytes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Improved Stability and Cyclability of Ceramic Solid Electrolyte by Coating Polymer

Rechargeable all-solid-state lithium (Li) metal batteries show better safety and energy density compared to commercial Li-ion batteries using liquid electrolyte. As the key component of Li metal batteries, ceramic solid-state electrolyte has attracted great interest because of its high ion conductivity and great potential in interfacing with Li metal. Ceramic electrolyte has a more stable interface with Li metal than liquid electrolyte, but chemical reaction and Li dendrite growth at the electrolyte/Li interface are still significant, which causes device degradation and failure by cycling of Li plating and stripping. Unlike ceramic electrolyte, polymer electrolyte has a relatively stable interface with Li metal and better mechanical flexibility. Therefore, we introduced a polymer electrolyte coating to protect the ceramic electrolyte from direct contact with Li metal. The galvanotactic cycling Li plating/striping data on the devices with (without) the coating illustrates increased (decreased) overall conductivity and cyclability of the test cell by the cycling. Nanometer-scale ionic-transport imaging, based on atomic force microscopy, shows that cycling degrades the ceramic-only electrolyte by partially blocking ionic transport in areas; in contrast, cycling on the polymer-coated electrolyte improves ionic conductivity. Compared with the ceramic-only electrolyte, this novel polymer electrolyte coating on ceramic electrolyte shows less degradation when in contact with Li metal.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Interface Design for High‐Performance All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

All‐solid‐state batteries suffer from high interface resistance and lithium dendrite growth leading to low Li plating/stripping Coulombic efficiency (CE) of <90% and low critical current density at high capacity. Here, in this work, both challenges are simultaneously addressed and the Li plating/stripping CE is significantly increased to 99.6% at 0.2 mA cm −2 /0.2 mAh cm −2 , and critical current density (CCD) of > 3.0 mA cm −2 /3.0 mAh cm −2 by inserting a mixed ionic‐electronic conductive (MIEC) and lithiophobic LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi nanocomposite interlayer between Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte and Li anode. The highly lithiophobic LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi interlayer with high ionic conductivity (10 −5 S cm −1 ) and low electronic conductivity (3.4×10 −7 S cm −1 ) enables Li to plate on the current collector (CC) surface rather than on Li 6 PS 5 Cl surface avoiding Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte reduction. During initial Li plating on CC, Li penetrates into porous LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi interlayer and lithiates Bi nanoparticles into Li 3 Bi. The lithiophilic Li 3 Bi and Li 3 N nanoparticles in LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Li 3 Bi sub‐interlayer will move to CC along with plated Li, forming LiF‐C/Li 3 N‐Li 3 Bi lithiophobic/lithiophilic sublayer during the following Li stripping. This interlayer enables Co 0.1 Fe 0.9 S 2 /Li 6 PS 5 Cl/Li cell with an areal capacity of 1.4 mAh cm −2 to achieve a cycle life of >850 cycles at 150 mA g −1 . The lithiophobic/lithiophilic interlayer enables solid‐state metal batteries to simultaneously achieve high energy and long cycle life.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Failure analysis and design principles of silicon-based lithium-ion batteries using micron-sized porous silicon/carbon composite

Significant progresses have been made to overcome the fundamental challenges in silicon (Si)-based lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, much less work have been reported on the design and failure analysis these batteries for practical applications. In this work, we analyzed various cell design parameters affecting the performance of pouch cells using micron-sized porous Si with nano-pore structure and coated by pitch-carbon (p-Si/C). The correlation among particle level, electrode level, and cell level properties, especially the effect of electrode density on the volumetric capacity density of Si anode and full batteries have been systematically investigated. It is found that the corrosion of p-Si/C particle surface is the main failure mechanisms on the eventual capacity loss, while Li plating on anode electrode surface is the main reason for the fast capacity loss in later stage of cycling. The volumetric capacity of Si anode highly depends on both electrode density and the Si content. Moreover, the prelithiation of Si anodes is found to increase energy density while decreasing cycle life of Si-based full cells. Finally, the pathways and strategies for adoption of micron-sized p-Si/C anodes in LIBs have been proposed for their practical applications.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Fluorinated Glyme Solvents to Extend Lithium-Sulfur Battery Life (Final Technical Report, Unlimited)

This project investigated a number of partially fluorinated glymes (PFGs) as electrolyte cosolvents to improve the performance of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. A major issue in Li-S cells is the electrochemical reaction of sulfur in the cathode to form lithium polysulfides (LPS) that dissolve in the electrolyte. Those LPS are electrochemically and chemically reactive at the lithium anode, resulting in lithium sulfide deposition on the anode and also electrochemical reaction at both the anode and cathode, leading to a “polysulfide shuttle” and reduced coulombic efficiency (CE) and self-discharge of the cell. PFGs reduce the solubility of LPS while maintaining good solubility of lithium salts such as LiTFSI. By adjusting the amount of PFG as cosolvent in the electrolyte, we showed that the solubility of LPS in the electrolyte can be tuned. (It is not desirable to completely eliminate LPS in the electrolyte, as they facilitate electrochemical reaction of the electrically insulating S 8 and Li 2 S within the cathode by shuttling charge between them and the conductive carbon.) Another issue in Li-S cells is degradation of the Li anode over many cycles of stripping (discharge) and plating (charge). We showed that PFGs have a beneficial effect on the physical morphology of the Li anode, SEI formation, and the CE of a Li-Li cell. Among the many PFGs tested, we found the best performance from PFGs designated PFG2 and PFG5, and these two PFGs were thoroughly studied. A systematic coin-cell study of electrolyte solvents of 90:10, 80:20, or 70:30 DME:PFG (DME = 1,2-dimethoxyethane) revealed some systematic trends: a higher percentage of PFG solvent led to substantially longer cycle life, but at the same time reduced specific capacity (mAh/g(S)) and cell capacity at higher rates. These studies used LiFSI as the electrolyte salt, as it was found to extend cycle life compared to LiTFSI. Finally, the addition of a small amount of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) to the electrolyte was found to be beneficial. The overall optimal electrolyte solution was found to be 0.6 M LiFSI + 0.5 M LiNO 3 in 75:5:20 DME/DOL/PFG (either PFG2 or PFG5).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Effects of charging rates on LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC622)/graphite Li-ion cells

Enabling fast charging capability of lithium-ion battery is of great importance to widespread adoption of electric vehicles. Increasing the charging rates from state-of-the-art 2C (30 min) to 6C (10 min) requires deep understanding on the cell aging mechanism. Here, 400 mAh pouch cells are cycled at 1C, 4C and 6C charging rates with 1C discharging rate. Capacity fading, cathode structural changes, Li inventory loss, electrolyte composition changes and Li plating on graphite electrodes are thoroughly studied by various characterization techniques. The rapid capacity fading in cells at 6C charging rate is mainly due to Li inventory loss from cathode structure and metallic Li plating on graphite electrode at higher charging rate. Post-mortem analysis also revealed changes in electrolyte such as increased salt molarity and transesterification during fast charging.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Deconvoluting Effects of Lithium Morphology and SEI Stability at Moderate Current Density Using Interface Engineering

Lithium (Li)-morphology and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) are among the most significant performance regulators in Li-metal batteries (LMBs). While both Li-morphology and SEI composition play key roles in the cyclability of LMBs, less is understood about the individual contributions of each factor to overall Li reversibility, particularly at a practical current density (1 mA cm −2 ) at which the kinetics of both factors are not naturally separated. Herein, an interface engineering approach is introduced to deconvolute the impacts of Li-morphology and SEI composition on battery performance. By using interfacial nanofilms with differing resistivity (resistive HfO 2 versus conductive ZnO), the morphology of Li is varied, and by virtue of similar acidic character of the nanofilms, the formation of anion-rich SEIs is maintained. It is established that although the surface acidity of the thin films enables preformation of a more anion-rich SEI, it is not preserved after Li plating. It is further shown that resistance-controlled, low-surface-area Li-morphology exhibits up to threefold increase in stable cycle life when tested in multiple electrolytes. Overall, these findings explain why Li-morphological control is more advantageous for performance improvement than preformed SEI modulation due to the inherent challenges in SEI preservation.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Reactive Suspension Electrolytes for Lithium Metal Batteries

Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) suffer from dendrite growth and capacity loss, which compromise safety and cycle life. Here, we present a simple reactive suspension electrolyte (RSE) strategy. When metal oxide (MO x ) nanoparticles are dispersed in the liquid electrolyte, in situ formation of Li 2 O and Li–M phases occurs at the lithium metal anode. By studying two different types of RSEs, Type 1 RSEs (i.e., CuO RSE) without metal-Li alloying and Type 2 RSEs (i.e., ZnO RSE and In 2 O 3 RSE) with metal-Li alloying capability, we elucidate the roles of each reaction compound. Here, we find that Li 2 O can improve reversibility of Li metal anode by stabilizing the interphase while Li–M alloy phases guide uniform Li metal plating. Compared to the carbonate-type reference electrolyte, RSEs demonstrate reduced nucleation overpotential, lower interfacial impedance, and higher Coulombic efficiency, leading to an extended cycle life in Li|Li 1 Ni 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 full cells.

Lee, Junyoung [Stanford Univ., CA (United States)]↗

Understanding Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Formation at the Lithium Metal Anode of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are one of the most promising chemistries for the next generation of energy storage devices. In a standard Li-S cell, the metallic lithium anode is an essential component of the battery due to its low density, extremely high theoretical specific capacity, and very low negative electrochemical potential. However, several challenges related to the use of Li metal have prevented this battery technology from becoming commercially available. For instance, Li-anodes are highly reactive, which results in the continuous decomposition of the electrolyte and the formation of the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer. This, combined with the non-uniform deposition of Liions during plating at the anode surface, can seriously affect the performance, cycling, and safety of the battery. In addition, it has been suggested that a controlled SEI formation at the metallic Li anode can yield enhanced battery performance. Hence, a comprehensive understanding of how the SEI layer is formed can help elucidate improvements in this battery technology. In this work, the formation of the SEI layer in Li-S batteries is investigated using density functional theory (DFT) and ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations. The stability of liquid organic-based electrolyte components, salt concentration, electron-rich environments, and the use of inorganic solid-state electrolyte (SSE) materials are explored in order to provide molecular-level fundamental insights into how the nature and composition of the electrolyte can alter the initial stages of the SEI formation. The products of electrolyte decomposition and electro-/chemical reaction pathways of liquid electrolyte component such as solvent and salts are predicted from AIMD simulations of electrolyte-anode interfaces. Energetics of reactions from DFT ground-state optimizations are also presented to confirm the decomposition mechanisms. Some significant differences are then drawn regarding the use of low and high salt concentrations. Simulations under electron-rich environments show additional multielectron electrochemical reactions of solvent and salt decomposition taking place due to the excess of electrons and the presence of radical anions in the solution. Finally, the initial stages of formation, stability, and main constituents of interfaces between Li-metal and Sbased electrodes with sulfide-based SSEs are characterized in detail.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗