PLANET: Planetary, Lunar, and Asteroid Natural Environment Testbed at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
space environment↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Planetary environments”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Unlocking the Spacecraft and Human Habitat Microbiome to Enable the Next Generation of Space Exploration
Planetary protection is the discipline that prevents harmful contamination of the solar system during exploration activities. The current international guidelines and NASA policy addressing biological contamination on spacecraft surfaces contains prescriptive guidelines of spore requirements (e.g., 300 spores/m2, 5×105 spores per spacecraft) applicable to spacecraft bound for Mars. To verify these requirements spacecraft engineers sample spacecraft surfaces throughout the assembly, test and launch operations phase of the mission using damp water cotton swabs and polyester wipes. After sampling, the potential biological contamination is enumerated using a series of traditional microbiology techniques to include sonication, heat shocking at 80°C for 15min to select for spores, and growth on tryptic soy agar at 32°C for 72 hours. To enable crewed missions to Mars and robotic exploration of the Ocean Worlds a risk informed decision making / performance-based approach to assess biological contamination offers a promising solution in the trade space. Recognizing the need for a performance-based approach, NASA’s new Planetary Protection policies now incorporate the agility for missions to be able to leverage a performance or prescriptive approach. One of top contenders in the option space is a coupled quantitative, descriptive and functional based approach to be able to assess the quantity, types and capabilities of the biological contamination present on spacecraft surfaces. A tailored, mission by mission assurance case could then be formulated by building an argument around the target body, projected capabilities surrounding the types of organisms their potential for survival and proliferation, and ability to be transported on the target body to contaminate an area of biological interest. A performance-based requirement would then be used to demonstrate the mission’s compliance in protecting the planetary environment safety objectives. This symposium talk will showcase the background and need case for NASA to develop such a capability as well as provide an update on the efforts underway in developing a transparent and responsible performance-based approach to biological contamination assessments on spacecraft surfaces.
Habitat Microbiome↗
Extraterrestrial Molecular Indicators of Life Investigation (EMILI)
Future missions to Enceladus, Europa, Mars, and beyond may seek the molecular signs of extraterrestrial life through chemical analysis of acquired samples. Particularly on ocean worlds such as Enceladus and Europa, samples may contain trace ocean-borne molecular biosignatures of extant life that may or may not share similarities to those of terrestrial life. In situ analyses must be prepared to detect and characterize a wide range of possible molecular species, structures, and patterns, typically with exquisite sensitivity and within a complex, poorly-characterized planetary environment. The Extraterrestrial Molecular Indicators of Life Investigation (EMILI) is designed to meet or exceed the requirements of such missions for organic molecular analysis through a powerful combination of dual chemical separation and both optical and mass spectrometry detection techniques, realized in an integrated, compact instrument package fully compatible with anticipated flight resources and conditions. The full EMILI instrument combines two sample analysis subsystems to provide wide-ranging and complementary detection of organic compounds and inorganic salts. The Gas Analysis Processing System (GAPS) uses a chemical derivatization protocol with gas chromatography (GC) separation prior to detection in an ion trap mass spectrometer (ITMS) to enable full characterization of lower-polarity, volatile and semi-volatile molecules such as fatty acids and hydrocarbons. The Organic Capillary Electrophoresis ANalysis System (OCEANS) uses a liquid-based extraction protocol with CE separation to enable precise analysis of more water-soluble/polar compounds. OCEANS features a laser-induced fluorescence detection mode to perform ultra-sensitive quantitative analysis of chiral amino acids. In EMILI, OCEANS is additionally coupled to the same ITMS through a novel electrospray ionization interface. The common ITMS allows EMILI to identify and cross-correlate molecular species and patterns, detected through either or both protocols, of molecular weights to over 1000 u, potentially even revealing complex biosignatures such as alien oligopeptides and informational polymers.
Europa↗
Venus and Mars nominal natural environment for advanced manned planetary mission programs
Nominal natural environment values for advanced manned planetary space flights to Venus and Mars
MARS ENVIRONMENT↗
Recent developments in the ROAMS planetary rover simulation environment
This paper describes recent developments in the ROAMS physics-based simulator for planetary surface exploration rover vehicles. ROAMS includes models for various subsystems and components of the robotic vehicle including its mechanical subsystem, sensors, on-board resources, on-board control software, the terrain environment and terrain/vehicle interactions. The ROAMS simulator can be used for stand-alone simulation, closed-loop simulations with on-board software or for operator-in-the-loop simulations.
Sohl, G.↗
The effects of the sterilization environment on the design of structural systems for planetary landers.
Sterilization environment effects on structural systems design for interplanetary spacecraft
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL↗
Workshop on Radar Investigations of Planetary and Terrestrial Environments
Contents include the following: Salt Kinematics and InSAR. SAR Interferometry as a Tool for Monitoring Coastal Changes in the Nile River Delta of Egypt. Modem Radar Techniques for Geophysical Applications: Two Examples. WISDOM Experiment on the EXOMARS ESA Mission. An Ice Thickness Study Utilizing Ground Penetrating Radar on the Lower Jamapa. Probing the Martian Subsurface with Synthetic Aperture Radar. Planetary Surface Properties from Radar Polarimetric Observations. Imaging the Sub-surface Reflectors : Results From the RANETA/NETLANDER Field Test on the Antarctic Ice Shelf. Strategy for Selection of Mars Geophysical Analogue Sites. Observations of Low Frequency Low Altitude Plasma Oscillations at Mars and Implications for Electromagnetic Sounding of the Subsurface. Ionospheric Transmission Losses Associated with Mars-orbiting Radar. A Polarimetric Scattering Model for the 2-Layer Problem. Radars for Imaging and Sounding of Polar Ice Sheets. Strata: Ground Penetrating Radar for Mars Rovers. Scattering Limits to Depth of Radar Investigation: Lessons from the Bishop Tuff.
Source record↗
Environment for manned planetary missions
Radiation hazards of manned planetary missions
Johnson, F. S.↗
Environment for manned planetary missions.
Space radiation hazards for manned planetary missions in terms of Van Allen and solar flare proton radiation
Johnson, F. S.↗
Ames facility for simulating planetary probe heating environments
Progress is reported on the development of a giant-planet pilot facility which simulates the conditions expected at the peak heating point for a shallow entry into the atmosphere of Saturn, Jupiter, and Uranus.
Stine, H. A.↗
High Performance Thermal Switch for Lunar and Planetary Surface Extreme Environments
This paper describes a high performance thermal switch for lunar/planetary extreme environments. This device has been given the name Reverse-Operation DTE Thermal Switch (or ROD-TSW). Two different prototypes were designed, built, and tested. Their basis of operation is the mating/de-mating of parallel flat metal surfaces driven by the differential thermal expansion (DTE) between mid-to-high CTE metal/polymer or metal-only end-pieces and a low CTE, low thermal conductivity (k) metal/polymer support rod. The requirements were to be fully ON above 300 K and fully OFF below 260 K. A series of four tests were carried out to verify/qualify the prototypes. In the first (non-vacuum) test, the thermal switches were cooled with freeze-spray and the non-conductive rod in the OFF thermal path allowed electrical resistance to confirm the 273 K as-designed ON/OFF actuation temperature. In the second (vacuum) test, a calibrated Q-meter was used, which indicated 5 W/K ON, 0.002 W/K OFF conductance (2500:1 ON/OFF ratio). To increase readiness to TRL6, a vibration test with pre/post thermal cycling followed by a 36-day test in a relevant environment were also carried out. This paper describes the development program and on-going related work at JPL.
Bugby, David C↗
High Performance Thermal Switch for Lunar and Planetary Surface Extreme Environments
This paper describes a high performance thermal switch for lunar/planetary extreme environments. This device has been given the name Reverse-Operation DTE Thermal Switch (or ROD-TSW). Two different prototypes were designed, built, and tested. Their basis of operation is the mating/de-mating of parallel flat metal surfaces driven by the differential thermal expansion (DTE) between mid-to-high CTE metal/polymer or metal-only end-pieces and a low CTE, low thermal conductivity (k) metal/polymer support rod. The requirements were to be fully ON above 300 K and fully OFF below 260 K. A series of four tests were carried out to verify/qualify the prototypes. In the first (non-vacuum) test, the thermal switches were cooled with freeze-spray and the non-conductive rod in the OFF thermal path allowed electrical resistance to confirm the 273 K as-designed ON/OFF actuation temperature. In the second (vacuum) test, a calibrated Q-meter was used, which indicated 5 W/K ON, 0.002 W/K OFF conductance (2500:1 ON/OFF ratio). To increase readiness to TRL6, a vibration test with pre/post thermal cycling followed by a 36-day test in a relevant environment were also carried out. This paper describes the development program and on-going related work at JPL.
Bugby, David C.↗
Planetary and Lunar Environment Thermal Toolbox Elements (PALETTE)
No abstract provided
Rivera, Jose G↗
Planetary and Lunar Environment Thermal Toolbox Elements (PALETTE) Project Year One Results
This paper summarizes the technology development progress made during year one of the three-year JPL PALETTE project, which is funded by the NASA STMD Game Changing Development (GCD) Program. The project goal is to ensure that a full “palette” of flight-ready (high TRL) thermal “toolbox” elements is available so that engineers can create passive, ultra-isolative thermal designs for science instruments on a variety of carriers in lunar/planetary extreme environments. PALETTE is structured to meet the need via four design/build/test tasks and four analysis/study tasks. This paper focuses on Tasks 1-4, the four design/build/test tasks. Task 1 involves the development of nested thermally-switched enclosures featuring a reverse-operation DTE thermal switch (ROD-TSW) in series with a propylene miniaturized loop heat pipe (mini-LHP). Task 2 involves the development of a parabolic reflector radiator (PRR) for low latitude lunar sites. Task 3 involves the development of a low effective emissivity (e*) multilayer insulation (MLI) known as “spacerless” MLI. Finally, Task 4 involves the development of low conductance (G) thermal isolators. Available test results for all four tasks will be summarized in the paper, as will the plans for the remainder of the PALETTE project.
Britton, Shawn R↗
Star-exoplanet interactions: A growing interdisciplinary field in heliophysics
Traditionally, heliophysics is characterized as the study of the near-Earth space environment, where plasmas and neutral gases originating from the Earth, the Sun, and other solar system bodies interact in ways that are detectable only through in-situ or close-range (usually within ~10 AU) remote sensing. As a result, heliophysics has data from the space environment around a handful of solar system objects, in particular the Sun and Earth. Comparatively, astrophysics has data from an extensive array of objects, but is more limited in temporal, spatial, and wavelength information from any individual object. Thus, our understanding of planetary space environments as a complex, multi-dimensional network of specific interacting systems may in the past have seemed to have little to do with the highly diverse space environments detected through astrophysical methods. Recent technological advances have begun to bridge this divide. Exoplanetary studies are opening up avenues to study planetary environments beyond our solar system, with missions like Kepler, TESS, and JWST, along with increasing capabilities of ground-based observations. At the same time, heliophysics studies are pushing beyond the boundaries of our heliosphere with Voyager, IBEX, and the future IMAP mission. The interdisciplinary field of star-exoplanet interactions is a critical, growing area of study that enriches heliophysics. A multidisciplinary approach to heliophysics enables us to better understand universal processes that operate in diverse environments, as well as the evolution of our solar system and extreme space weather. The expertise, data, theory, and modeling tools developed by heliophysicists are crucial in understanding the space environments of exoplanets, their host stars, and their potential habitability. The mutual benefit that heliophysics and exoplanetary studies offer each other depends on strong, continuing solar system-focused and Earth-focused heliophysics studies. The heliophysics discipline requires new targeted funding to support inter-divisional opportunities, including small multi-disciplinary research projects, large collaborative research teams, and observations targeting the heliophysics of planetary and exoplanet systems. Here we discuss areas of heliophysics-relevant exoplanetary research, observational opportunities and challenges, and ways to promote the inclusion of heliophysics within the wider exoplanetary community.
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗
Star-Exoplanet Interactions: A Growing Interdisciplinary Field in Heliophysics
Traditionally, heliophysics is characterized as the study of the near-Earth space environment, where plasmas and neutral gases originating from the Earth, the Sun, and other solar system bodies interact in ways that are detectable only through in-situ or close-range (usually within ∼10 AU) remote sensing. As a result, heliophysics has data from the space environment around a handful of solar system objects, in particular the Sun and Earth. Comparatively, astrophysics has data from an extensive array of objects, but is more limited in temporal, spatial, and wavelength information from any individual object. Thus, our understanding of planetary space environments as a complex, multi-dimensional network of specific interacting systems may in the past have seemed to have little to do with the highly diverse space environments detected through astrophysical methods. Recent technological advances have begun to bridge this divide. Exoplanetary studies are opening up avenues to study planetary environments beyond our solar system, with missions like Kepler, TESS, and JWST, along with increasing capabilities of ground-based observations. At the same time, heliophysics studies are pushing beyond the boundaries of our heliosphere with Voyager, IBEX, and the future IMAP mission. The interdisciplinary field of star-exoplanet interactions is a critical, growing area of study that enriches heliophysics. A multidisciplinary approach to heliophysics enables us to better understand universal processes that operate in diverse environments, as well as the evolution of our solar system and extreme space weather. The expertise, data, theory, and modeling tools developed by heliophysicists are crucial in understanding the space environments of exoplanets, their host stars, and their potential habitability. The mutual benefit that heliophysics and exoplanetary studies offer each other depends on strong, continuing solar system-focused and Earth-focused heliophysics studies. The heliophysics discipline requires new targeted funding to support inter-divisional opportunities, including small multi-disciplinary research projects, large collaborative research teams, and observations targeting the heliophysics of planetary and exoplanet systems. Here we discuss areas of heliophysics-relevant exoplanetary research, observational opportunities and challenges, and ways to promote the inclusion of heliophysics within the wider exoplanetary community.
heliophysics↗
Caves as Terrestrial Analogs for Mapping and Exploration in Planetary Surface and Subsurface Environments.
The Kinematic Navigation and Cartography Knapsack (KNaCK) team is developing tools that will enable ultra-high resolution terrain mapping and navigation at the lunar surface. KNaCK uses mobile light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) algorithms to operate in fully GPS-denied and unilluminated environments. Testing in relevant analogs is key to perfecting this technology for planetary applications. After utilizing desert and volcanic environments for multiple tests, the team is now using caves as an additional proving ground. Tests in terrestrial caves have demonstrated the potential of mobile SLAM LiDAR for use in challenging surface environments such as steep walled craters and permanently shadowed regions as well as for lunar, planetary, and terrestrial cave exploration, study, and utilization.
LiDAR↗
Development of High-Performance Solar Cells for the Jupiter and Saturn Environments
The planetary science community is interested in targets far from the Sun. Solar arrays are relatively low-cost, readily available, highly reliable. However, high-AU environments are challenging for solar arrays e.g. Jupiter: high radiation and 3-4% of one sun Saturn: milder radiation but only 1% of one sun. Currently, solar arrays for low irradiance low temperature (LILT) are typically large and massive, e.g. ~600kg for planned Europa Clipper. There is a need for cells optimized for Jupiter and/or Saturn.
Boca, Andreea↗