Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Optical Navigation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2013

4DoF Drift Free Navigation Using Inertial Cues and Optical Flow

In this paper, we describe a novel approach in fusing optical flow with inertial cues (3D acceleration and 3D angular velocities) in order to navigate a Micro Aerial Vehicle (MAV) drift free in 4DoF and metric velocity. Our approach only requires two consecutive images with a minimum of three feature matches. It does not require any (point) map nor any type of feature history. Thus it is an inherently failsafe approach that is immune to map and feature-track failures. With these minimal requirements we show in real experiments that the system is able to navigate drift free in all angles including yaw, in one metric position axis, and in 3D metric velocity. Furthermore, it is a power-on-and-go system able to online self-calibrate the inertial biases, the visual scale and the full 6DoF extrinsic transformation parameters between camera and IMU.

reconnissance↗
NASA NTRS1997

(abstract) Galileo Navigation: Launch to Jupiter Orbit

The Galileo spacecraft was launched on October 18, 1989. After a 3.7 billion kilometer journey lasting just over six years, the Galileo Orbiter and Probe arrived at Jupiter on December 7, 1995. The atmospheric Probe survived its atmospheric entry and successfully transmitted data to the Orbiter flying overhead. To date, the Orbiter has successfully completed the first three of the ten planned satellite encounters. Navigation for the Galileo Mission has proved to be a unique and challenging task. The challenges and results of navigating Galileo through the interplanetary transfer to Jupiter, delivery of the atmospheric entry Probe, Jupiter orbit insertion, and the orbital tour are presented in this paper.

Galileo Jupiter navigation orbits gravity assists ↗
DOE OSTI2017

Potentialities of laser systems for remote sensing of the atmosphere at a wide variability of optical and physical characteristics: dimensionless-parametric modelling

Within the framework of generalisation of different approaches to the modelling of atmospheric lidars, the methodology capabilities for dimensionless-parametric analysis are expanded. The developed approach simplifies the analysis of the signal-to-noise ratio and potential capabilities of existing and newly developed monitoring systems with a wide variability of atmospheric and optical conditions and a great variety of modern lidars. Its applicability to the problems of remote atmospheric sensing, environmental monitoring and lidar navigation in providing the eye safety, noise immunity and reliability is discussed. (paper)

42 ENGINEERING↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Camera Calibration and Alignment Metrology at Johnson Space Center’s Electro-Optics Laboratory

It is increasingly common to see spacecraft equipped with cameras for the purpose of navigation. Images are either sent to Earth or processed autonomously on-board to provide information about the vehicle’s position, velocity, and/or attitude. These can be images of stars or celestial bodies for absolute navigation, or images of another spacecraft for relative navigation. While monocular cameras do not provide range information, the images they capture can be processed to determine bearing vectors to target objects within the camera’s field of view. For a camera to be effective in navigation, it must be carefully calibrated and aligned. This involves accurately modeling the optical effects that govern the projection of line-of-sight directions onto the camera’s pixels and determining the camera’s orientation relative to the spacecraft’s reference frame. Engineers at Johnson Space Center’s Electro-Optics Lab regularly perform camera inspection, calibration, and alignment metrology. This was done for the Orion Optical Navigation (OpNav) Camera, the Orion Docking Camera (DCAM), and for numerous cameras belonging to commercial partners. The nature of optical navigation means that cameras must be well-calibrated and their attitude well understood to provide high accuracy bearing measurements to the navigation filter. The stringent accuracy requirements for Orion could not have been met using traditional checkerboard camera calibration or by simply relying on design drawings. This paper details the hardware, software, techniques, and algorithms used by the EOL team to achieve this level of accuracy.

Paul D Mckee↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Camera Calibration and Alignment Metrology at Johnson Space Center’s Electro-Optics Laboratory

It is increasingly common to see spacecraft equipped with cameras for the purpose of navigation. Images are either sent to Earth or processed autonomously on-board to provide information about the vehicle’s position, velocity, and/or attitude. These can be images of stars or celestial bodies for absolute navigation, or images of another spacecraft for relative navigation. While monocular cameras do not provide range information, the images they capture can be processed to determine bearing vectors to target objects within the camera’s field of view. For a camera to be effective in navigation, it must be carefully calibrated and aligned. This involves accurately modeling the optical effects that govern the projection of line-of-sight directions onto the camera’s pixels and determining the camera’s orientation relative to the spacecraft’s reference frame. Engineers at Johnson Space Center’s Electro-Optics Lab regularly perform camera inspection, calibration, and alignment metrology. This was done for the Orion Optical Navigation (OpNav) Camera, the Orion Docking Camera (DCAM), and for numerous cameras belonging to commercial partners. The nature of optical navigation means that cameras must be well-calibrated and their attitude well understood to provide high accuracy bearing measurements to the navigation filter. The stringent accuracy requirements for Orion could not have been met using traditional checkerboard camera calibration or by simply relying on design drawings. This paper details the hardware, software, techniques, and algorithms used by the EOL team to achieve this level of accuracy.

Paul McKee↗
NASA NTRS1976

Navigation accuracy analysis for the Mariner-Jupiter-Saturn 1977 mission

The results of the latest navigation capability study for the Mariner-Jupiter-Saturn 1977 mission are presented and analyzed. Predicted planet-relative and satellite-relative accuracies are given for radio only and radio plus optical approach navigation on three representative trajectories. In addition, planet-relative accuracies are given for cruise navigation on one of the trajectories. The dynamical and measurement error models used in the study are discussed, and the basic MJS77 navigation strategy is described. The navigation capability is evaluated in the light of the mission's objectives; and the variation in capability among the three trajectories is examined with regard to the effects of the major error sources and the trajectory dependent encounter geometries.

Jacobson, R. A.↗
NASA NTRS2001

Automated landmark identification for spacecraft navigation

An integrated approach to surface relative optical landmark tracking for spacecraft is being developed. Landmarks are defined as full digital topography/albedo maps and are determined from previous imaging and navigation data. Initially, this technique will speed up ground based optical navigation. Ultimately, it will enable on-board trajectory determination during orbital and landing maneuvers.

landmark↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optimized Trajectory Correction Burn Placement for the NASA Artemis II Mission

The NASA Artemis II mission represents the first time humans plan to return to the lunar vicinity in over 50 years with a crew traveling to the Moon in the Orion spacecraft on a free return trajectory. This first crewed mission of the Artemis program will evaluate human-rated elements of Orion in preparation to sending astronauts to the lunar surface. The selected free-return cislunar trajectory profile that is reminiscent of the Apollo 8 mission that nominally requires no additional translational burns following the trans-lunar injection (TLI) burn. Due to crew activity, maneuver execution errors, navigation uncertainty, orbit insertion errors, disturbance accelerations, and other system limitations; periodic trajectory corrections burns are necessary to ensure proper entry interface (EI) conditions are satisfied for a safe return to Earth. Robust trajectory optimization techniques are utilized to determine the optimized placements for the Artemis II trajectory correction burns that accounts for the crew schedule, both the primary and backup navigation systems, targeting strategies and burn plan configurations, spacecraft venting, thruster selection, and the integrated GN&C performance.

Linear Covariance Analysis↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The LuNaMaps Project: Advancing Capabilities for Developing and Validating Digital Elevation Models of Rocky Surfaces from Orbital Data

Both navigation and surface science can benefit from the ability to generate high resolution and accurate maps of the surface of the Moon and other solar system bodies. The primary way these maps are generated is through the use of orbital imagery and ranging data. Traditionally, the process of using orbital imagery and ranging data is tedious and labor-intensive. Additionally, once maps have been built, there has generally been limited effort in developing standards by which to verify the accuracy and quality of the generated maps. The Lunar Navigation Maps (LuNaMaps) project is a NASA Game Changing Development (GCD) project which over the last 4 years has aimed to address these issues both for the Moon and for other rocky solar system bodies. This has been accomplished through development of new and existing capabilities including: a suite of methods and tools to combine all sources of orbital imagery; a benchmark data set as well as basic requirements for high-fidelity simulations of precision landing functions; tools to synthetically enhance map products with lander-scale features for use in the development and testing of hazard detection systems; methods and tools to evaluate the accuracy of developed digital elevation maps (DEMs) and their quality for use in terrain relative navigation scenarios; and tools to realistically render image and lidar data. In this work, we provide an overview of the capabilities developed through LuNaMaps, demonstrating its use for processing existing lunar data, and describing how it can be applied to other use cases. We additionally provide preliminary results showing the application of the developed tools and processes to the generation of elevation maps of the Lunar Surface Proving Grounds (LSPG) lunar analog at Astrobotic’s Mojave testing facility using “orbital imagery” captured by a drone. In this terrestrial demonstration, we have the benefit of being able to compare the results to a ground truth model of the LSPG. We finally describe plans to use the newly created maps in a terrestrial terrain relative navigation demonstration over the LSPG in early 2025.

optical navigation↗
DOE OSTI2015

Survivability design for a hybrid underwater vehicle

A novel hybrid underwater robotic vehicle (HROV) capable of working to the full ocean depth has been developed. The battery powered vehicle operates in two modes: operate as an untethered autonomous vehicle in autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) mode and operate under remote control connected to the surface vessel by a lightweight, fiber optic tether in remotely operated vehicle (ROV) mode. Considering the hazardous underwater environment at the limiting depth and the hybrid operating modes, survivability has been placed on an equal level with the other design attributes of the HROV since the beginning of the project. This paper reports the survivability design elements for the HROV including basic vehicle design of integrated navigation and integrated communication, emergency recovery strategy, distributed architecture, redundant bus, dual battery package, emergency jettison system and self-repairing control system.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Monocular Horizon Navigation

The Artemis program advances towards operations on the lunar surface, where precise surface localization is a driving need for safety and science. Using the observable horizon as an image landmark allows for estimating the photographer’s position. This work analyzes the application of Perspective-n-Point (PnP) algorithms to this lunar localization problem. Batch simulations using lunar topography display the accuracy and drawbacks of these methods. Monte Carlo techniques show the pipeline’s solutions as measurements provided to a navigation filter. When filtered, these solutions have position errors of 50 meters or better, which is similar to or better than the performance of other methods of surface localization.

optical navigation↗
NASA NTRS2010

Earth Return Navigation Analysis for Manned Spacecraft Using Optical and Radiometric Measurements

Future manned space missions will travel beyond low Earth orbit with more stringent navigation requirements and fewer navigation resources than used for the Apollo Program of the 1960s. A study has been performed to assess radiometric and optical tracking capabilities necessary to meet nominal and contingency Earth entry flight path angle requirements. Results indicate that 3 tracking stations will be insufficient for meeting nominal entry requirements, while the performance of a 6 station architecture is dependent on the entry geometry. Optical tracking results indicate that a narrow-angle camera is required for satisfying contingency Earth return requirements.

GN&C↗
NASA NTRS2008

Optical Displacement Sensor for Sub-Hertz Applications

A document discusses a sensor made from off-the-shelf electro-optical photodiodes and electronics that achieves 20 nm/(Hz)(exp 1/2) displacement sensitivity at 1 mHz. This innovation was created using a fiber-coupled laser diode (or Nd:YAG) through a collimator and an aperture as the illumination source. Together with a germanium quad photodiode, the above-mentioned displacement sensor sensitivities have been achieved. This system was designed to aid the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) with microthruster tests and to be a backup sensor for monitoring the relative position between a proof mass and a spacecraft for drag-free navigation. The optical displacement sensor can be used to monitor any small displacement from a remote location with minimal invasion on the system.

Abramovici, Alexander↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Tutorial on LuNaMaps Developed Tools andProcesses for Mapping the Lunar Surface

The main contribution of this project is the combined knowledge of terrain relative navigation experts and lunar scientists who are familiar with both the lunar orbital imagery and the instruments that collected the data as well as how a TRN system utilizes map data. This knowledge comes in the form of published technical papers, benchmark map data sets, and software tools that can help others automate the process of creating the necessary maps for their own landing sites in the future. This presentation provides a brief overview of the tools and processes developed by the project.

optical navigation↗
NASA NTRS2021

Architecture and Operations of the OSIRIS-REx Independent Navigation Team

The Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security-Regolith Explorer (OSIRIS-REx) GoddardSpace Flight Center (GSFC) Independent Navigation Team (INT) performs center-finding and landmark-basedOptical Navigation (OpNav), Orbit Determination (OD), maneuver verification, and additional analyses in support ofnavigation operations motivated by a stringent set of science requirements. The INT has adopted a streamlined andagile approach to navigation operations support via a virtual operations environment, known as "OREX-NAV",which leverages existing capabilities of the Space Science Mission Operations (SSMO) virtual Multi-MissionOperations Center (vMMOC). The virtual environment architecture of OREX-NAV enables the INT to perform dailyoperational tasks and seamlessly interface with external mission networks, regardless of physical location. Throughthe automation and process adopted, the INT is able to keep pace with the rapid cadence of required deliverables.

OSIRIS-REx↗