Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “vacuum”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2015

Characterization of Vacuum Facility Background Gas Through Simulation and Considerations for Electric Propulsion Ground Testing

The background gas in a vacuum facility for electric propulsion ground testing is examined in detail through a series of cold flow simulations using a direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) code. The focus here is on the background gas itself, its structure and characteristics, rather than assessing its interaction and impact on thruster operation. The background gas, which is often incorrectly characterized as uniform, is found to have a notable velocity within a test facility. The gas velocity has an impact on the proper measurement of pressure and the calculation of ingestion flux to a thruster. There are also considerations for best practices for tests that involve the introduction of supplemental gas flows to artificially increase the background pressure. All of these effects need to be accounted for to properly characterize the operation of electric propulsion thrusters across different ground test vacuum facilities.

Test Facilities↗
NASA NTRS2017

Thermal Considerations for Reducing the Cooldown and Warmup Duration of the James Webb Space Telescope OTIS Cryo-Vacuum Test

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), set to launch in 2018, is NASAs next-generation flagship telescope. The Optical Telescope Element (OTE) and Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM) contain all of the optical surfaces and instruments to capture and analyze the telescopes infrared targets. The integrated OTE and ISIM are denoted as OTIS, and will be tested as a single unit in a critical thermal-vacuum test in mid-2017 at NASA Johnson Space Centers Chamber A facility. The payload will be evaluated for workmanship and functionality in a 20K simulated flight environment during this thermal-vacuum test. However, the sheer thermal mass of the OTIS payload as well as the restrictive gradient, rate, and contamination-related constraints placed on test components precludes rapid cooldown or warmup to its steady-state cryo-balance condition. Hardware safety considerations precludes injection of helium gas for free molecular heat transfer. Initial thermal analysis predicted that transient radiative cooldown from ambient temperatures, while meeting all limits and constraints, would take 33.3 days; warmup similarly would take 28.4 days. This paper discusses methods used to reduce transition times from the original predictions through modulation of boundary temperatures and environmental conditions. By optimizing helium shroud transition rates and heater usage, as well as rigorously re-examining previously imposed constraints, savings of up to three days on cooldown and up to a week on warmup can be achieved. The efficiencies gained through these methods allow the JWST thermal test team to create faster cooldown and warmup profiles, thus reducing the overall test duration and cost, while keeping all of the required test operations.

Thermal↗
NASA NTRS2017

Thermal Considerations for Reducing the Cooldown and Warmup Duration of the James Webb Space Telescope OTIS Cryo-Vacuum Test

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), set to launch in 2018, is NASAs next-generation flagship telescope. The Optical Telescope Element (OTE) and Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM) contain all of the optical surfaces and instruments to capture and analyze the telescopes infrared targets. The integrated OTE and ISIM are denoted as OTIS, and will be tested as a single unit in a critical thermal-vacuum test in mid-2017 at NASA Johnson Space Centers Chamber A facility. The payload will be evaluated for workmanship and functionality in a 20K simulated flight environment during this thermal-vacuum test. However, the sheer thermal mass of the OTIS payload as well as the restrictive gradient, rate, and contamination-related constraints placed on test components precludes rapid cooldown or warmup to its steady-state cryo-balance condition. Hardware safety considerations precludes injection of helium gas for free molecular heat transfer. Initial thermal analysis predicted that transient radiative cooldown from ambient temperatures, while meeting all limits and constraints, would take 33.3 days; warmup similarly would take 28.4 days. This paper discusses methods used to reduce transition times from the original predictions through modulation of boundary temperatures and environmental conditions. By optimizing helium shroud transition rates and heater usage, as well as rigorously re-examining previously imposed constraints, savings of up to three days on cooldown and up to a week on warmup can be achieved. The efficiencies gained through these methods allow the JWST thermal test team to create faster cooldown and warmup profiles, thus reducing the overall test duration and cost, while keeping all of the required test operations.

JWST↗
NASA NTRS2015

Demonstration of Long Vacuum Integrity Lifetime of Trapped Ion Standard Package

A compact Hg ion trap package that was vacuum-sealed since 9 years has been demonstrated to be successfully operational showing excellent ion-trap lifetime exceeding 400 days. In addition to the vacuum package, the same 9-year old optical and detection packages are utilized to obtain these results. Charge transfer relaxation effects between neutral Hg and trapped Hg ion are studied. This work shows the reliability of such units in view of next-generation ground and space-borne trapped ion clocks.

charge-transfer relaxation↗
NASA NTRS2018

Using NASA's Molecular Adsorber Coating Technology During Thermal Vacuum Testing to Protect Critical Laser Flight Optics on the ATLAS Instrument

The Molecular Adsorber Coating (MAC) is a sprayable coatings technology that was developed at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). The coating was designed to address molecular contamination concerns on or near sensitive surfaces and instruments within the spacecraft for flight or ground-based applications in vacuum conditions. This paper will discuss the use of NASA's MAC technology to isolate and protect the critical laser flight optics of the Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS) instrument on the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2). MAC was strategically used during thermal vacuum (TVAC) testing efforts to reduce the risk of contaminating the laser optical components from non-baked items and other unknown outgassing sources from the chamber environment. This paper summarizes the design and implementation efforts, and the chemical analysis of the MAC samples that were used during two recent TVAC tests for the ICESat-2/ATLAS mission.

thermal vacuum↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Molecular Accumulation during JWST’s Optical Telescope Cryogenic Thermal Vacuum Testing

Maintaining molecular cleanliness during the JWST’s Optical Telescope/Instrument Module (OTIS) Cryogenic Thermal Vacuum (TV) test campaign was critical to the success of its optical mission on orbit. In the thermal vacuum tests leading up to the final cryogenic test to validate the OTIS flight hardware, NASA Johnson Space Center’s (JSC’s) TV Chamber A was fully characterized for molecular contamination. It was found to contain common volatile condensable materials (VCM), including hydrocarbons, plasticizers, and silicones, all of which absorb in JWST’s infrared wavelength region. Due to the risks involved, cleaning molecular contamination from the OTIS mirrors was not an option and heating the Primary Mirror (PM) segments would have also been a risky and expensive endeavor. As a result, a monitoring process was developed and implemented during four different Pathfinder or risk reduction tests that were scheduled to occur prior to the flight hardware test. The goal was to quantify and assess the risk of molecular contamination depositing on the PM resulting from relatively warm chamber shrouds “leading” colder PM mirrors during warmup, by a margin of 10-50 Kelvin (K). This was accomplished using Cryogenic Quartz Crystal Microbalances (CQCMs), held at temperatures slightly cooler than the segments to signal the onset of contamination events. Per the JWST Contamination Control Plan (CCP)1, the total Primary Mirror molecular allocation requirement was 50 angstroms. In all tests, the results showed an average accumulated molecular contamination of <10 angstroms.

molecular, contamination, thermal vacuum, cryogeni↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of a Thermal Vacuum Chamber for Lunar Surface Simulation

Simulating the lunar surface environment is a critical component in advancing the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of newly developed lunar surface exploration systems and understanding regolith dynamics. Developing systems with the ability to simulate the lunar surface environment presents unique challenges associated with both the hardware requirements of the system and the uniqueness of the lunar environment. Additionally, many thermal vacuum testing systems are large and expensive to maintain and operate, increasing the cost for the end users. Many low TRL prototypes are small-scale and low-cost, making it unfeasible and unnecessary to utilize larger scale testing facilities. A small-scale, modular, and easily reconfigurable chamber with a quick testing turnaround time could allow rapid TRL advancement with minimal costs and time commitments relative to many of the current testing facilities. Here, we introduce a thermal vacuum chamber system that will support experimentation and rapid testing and maturation of small-scale hardware systems and subsystems for lunar surface exploration.

Thermal Vacuum Chamber↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Exploration Portable Life Support Subsystem (xPLSS) Thermal Modeling to Thermal Vacuum Testing

To support NASA’s goal to return to the Moon through the Artemis mission, the development of an exploration portable life support system (xPLSS) has been conducted at Johnson Space Center (JSC). As part of this development process, a large system level thermal/fluid model of the xPLSS was developed using Thermal Desktop and an in-house human model (METMAN). The xPLSS model was used throughout the design process to predict the performance and temperature of nearly all components within the xPLSS. In the fall of 2023, the design, verification, and testing (DVT) unit of the xPLSS was tested in a thermal vacuum (TVAC) chamber at JSC. This testing consisted of combining the xPLSS with an upper torso of the exploration pressure garment system (xPGS) and simulating five extravehicular activities (EVAs) in extreme thermal conditions (two cold EVAs and three hot EVAs). The data generated in this test series provided system level data of the xPLSS operating in vacuum and at flight-like environmental temperatures for the first time. This data was compared to results output by the xPLSS system model to assess the accuracy of previous analyses and improve the fidelity and accuracy of the xPLSS system model. The comparison between model and test hardware provides valuable insight that will help improve the design and fidelity of next generation space suits. In general, comparison between test data and model data generally showed slightly un-conservative values (model predicting colder temperatures than test in hot environments, and hotter temperatures than test in cold environments). Model assumptions and test assumptions were assessed to understand potential causes of some of these sources in error. Recommendations to improve the fidelity of the xPLSS model were also made based on the results presented in this paper.

xPLSS↗
NASA NTRS2024

Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) Chamber B Thermal Vacuum “Suit 2” Pressure Garment System Hardware and Test Design

NASA’s Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) is the government reference next-generation space suit design and is engineered to protect astronauts from extreme lunar environmental temperatures. To evaluate the xEMU hardware thermal requirements, the xEMU Testing Team invented, designed, and executed a dual-suit, uncrewed thermal vacuum (TVAC) test at Johnson Space Center’s (JSC) Chamber B. This paper details the test hardware design and test methodology for the “Suit 2” Pressure Garment System (PGS) test article. The uncrewed “Suit 2” PGS test article consisted of a full PGS assembly with simulated Portable Life Support System (PLSS) functionality provided by test equipment, including a ventilation loop and two distinct thermal control loops. This paper will discuss in depth the test hardware design, including internal suit thermal boundary simulation, sensor quantity and placement, test support equipment rigs for gas flow, water flow, and power. Custom hardware designed to add additional penetrations to the suit or provide additional interfaces for sensors will also be discussed. This paper will also address the assembly and integration sequence for the test article. In addition to test hardware design, this paper will provide insights into the test methodology for this test article, including a discussion of thermal steady-state testing, simultaneous dual suit thermal vacuum testing, and hazard mitigation and controls.

xEMU↗
NASA NTRS2024

Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) Chamber B Thermal Vacuum “Suit 2” Pressure Garment System Test Article Results

NASA’s Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) is the government reference next-generation spacesuit design and is engineered to protect astronauts from extreme lunar environmental temperatures. To evaluate the xEMU hardware thermal requirements, the xEMU Testing Team invented, designed, and executed a dual-suit, uncrewed thermal vacuum (TVAC) test at Johnson Space Center’s (JSC) Chamber B. This paper details the test results from the “Suit 2” Pressure Garment System (PGS) test article. The primary objective of the “Suit 2” PGS test article was to evaluate system-level suit heat leak and Environmental Protection Garment (EPG) thermal performance. Eleven unique thermal profiles were tested including both cold and hot environmental cases over the course of five continuous days of testing. The radiative thermal environment was controlled through exposure to liquid-nitrogen shrouds on the chamber walls and a heater cage surrounding the test article. This paper will principally focus on system-level thermal results from the “Suit 2” PGS test article. This paper will examine data collected from one-hundred and seventy thermocouples located in critical locations inside and outside of the suit, as well as seven resistance thermometers (RTDs) for calorimetry to determine total heat flux in and out of the suit. The test data will be compared against the system-level PGS thermal models for model validation. To conclude, this paper will address knowledge gaps presented by unmanned xPGS thermal vacuum testing and the current state of lunar xPGS thermal modeling and testing.

xEMU↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Exploration Portable Life Support Subsystem (xPLSS) Thermal Modeling to Thermal Vacuum Testing

To support NASA’s goal to return to the Moon through the Artemis Mission, the development of an Exploration Portable Life Support Subsystem (xPLSS) has been conducted at Johnson Space Center (JSC). As part of this development process, a large system level thermal/fluid model of the xPLSS was developed using Thermal Desktop and an in-house human model (METMAN). The xPLSS model was used throughout the design process to predict the performance and temperature of nearly all components within the xPLSS. In the fall of 2023, the Design, Verification, and Testing (DVT) unit of the xPLSS was tested in a thermal vacuum (TVAC) chamber at JSC. This testing consisted of combining the xPLSS with an upper torso of the Exploration Pressure Garment System (xPGS) and simulating five Extravehicular Activities (EVAs) in extreme thermal conditions (two cold EVAs and three hot EVAs). The data generated in this test series provided system level data of the xPLSS operating in vacuum and at flight-like environmental temperatures for the first time. These data were compared to results output by the xPLSS system model to assess the accuracy of previous analyses and improve the fidelity and accuracy of the xPLSS system model. The comparison between model and test hardware provides valuable insight that will help improve the design and fidelity of next generation space suits. In general, comparison between test data and model data generally showed slightly un-conservative values (model predicting colder temperatures than test in hot environments, and hotter temperatures than test in cold environments). Model assumptions and test assumptions were assessed to understand potential causes of some of these sources in error. Recommendations to improve the fidelity of the xPLSS model were also made based on the results presented in this paper.

xPLSS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Thermal Vacuum Testing of a Modified COTS Camera for Lunar Environments

The primary objective of this study was to simulate lunar thermal environments to qualify a modified Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) camera for potential flight applications. A comprehensive testing regimen was developed, including both vacuum and thermal vacuum testing. The tests subjected the camera to temperatures corresponding to expected extrema, and thermal performance was recorded throughout the process. The testing demonstrated that both the camera and its thermal protection systems were able to maintain operational functionality under most of the simulated conditions. The results of the testing indicate that the implemented thermal protection system is effective for the expected lunar environments. Despite the decrease in operational time in comparison with terrestrial usage, the camera's overall performance supports its suitability for use in both flight and lunar missions.

Thermal↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development and Validation of a High-Vacuum Thermal Conductivity Testbed for Aerospace Interface Materials

Spacecraft thermal margins depend on the temperature penalty of installed interfaces, yet catalog conductivity omits bondline thickness, mating surfaces, preload, and environment. The Testbed for Advanced Interface Materials in Vacuum (TAIMV) addresses this engineering-data gap by converting ambient/vacuum temperature fields from a four-coupon stack into quantities usable in spacecraft thermal models. Its 17-node steady-state model resolves axial conduction, parasitic fixture paths, grease-filled contact, radiation, and ambient convection. Four monolithic checks gave axial heat-rate ratios of 0.90–1.02, and Braycote calibration self-recovery gave 2.20% casewise mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and 2.85% maximum difference. With transferable fixture terms frozen, Krytox LVP tested cross-material transfer against a manufacturer-derived external relation. The six Krytox cases gave 2.28% MAPE, 5.10% maximum difference, and full-field residual root-mean-square values of 0.553 °C ambient and 1.306 °C vacuum. Installed-joint resistance spanned 6.39–7.15 × 10⁻⁴ m²·K/W for Braycote and 4.09–4.49 × 10⁻⁴ m²·K/W for Krytox, corresponding to 2.33–6.66 K per modeled interface over the tested heat-flux range. TAIMV therefore supplies directly usable installed-joint resistance and conductance, plus apparent installed conductivity and explicitly model-conditioned grease conductivity/contact terms.

heat transfer↗