Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “ATR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Characterization of Ultrathin Polymer Films Using p-polarized ATR-FTIR and Its Comparison with XPS

Here, we report on the chemical analysis of ultrathin (10 nm) polymer films using attenuated total reflectance (ATR)–FTIR technique based on p-polarized IR light and two types of enhancing substrates, i.e. metallic (Au) and dielectric (Si). We selected low temperature plasma treated ~10 nm-thick polystyrene films as a test case for demonstrating the capability of the p-polarized ATR-FTIR whose performance was further compared with the conventional X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) techniques. Although the ATR-FTIR cannot be used for quantitatively determining elemental compositions in polymers at which XPS excels, it allows to be operated under non-vacuum conditions and study hydrogen containing moieties. By correcting the contact condition between polymer surface and ATR prism, the relative concentration of the chemical bonds from different samples can be compared. Since ATR-FTIR and XPS provide complementary information on chemical bonds, their combination provides a powerful approach for studying the composition and bonding of polymers.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

ADVANCED TEST REACTOR (ATR) CONVERSION TO LOW ENRICHED URANIUM (LEU) FUEL

The United States Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Office of Material Management and Minimization (MMM) is working to convert research reactors globally from highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. MMM and its predecessor programs have converted or verified the shutdown of 88 HEU research reactors and isotope production facilities, using LEU fuel developed in the 1980s. However, there is a small set of high performance research reactors which require a new high density LEU fuel for conversion, including six U.S. high performance research reactors (USHPRRs), which include the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) and the ATR Critical (ATRC) Facility at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) near Idaho Falls, ID; University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) at Columbia, MO; Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR) at MIT in Cambridge, MA; High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) near Oak Ridge, TN; and National Bureau of Standards Reactor (NBSR) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Center for Neutron Research (NCNR) in Gaithersburg, MA. These reactors will share the same uranium-molybdenum (U-Mo) fuel plate design. The U-Mo fuel meat foil will have a zirconium (Zr) diffusion barrier with aluminum cladding. Three different application methods for the Zr diffusion barrier layer are being pursued – co-rolled, electroplating and plasma spraying. Fabrication of the higher density LEU U-Mo fuel has presented several challenges. Because the U-Mo fuel fabrication process uses the existing stockpile of 93% highly enriched uranium (HEU) to be blended with molybdenum and depleted uranium (DU) to form 19.75% LEU, cost benefits of enriching to 19.75% will not be realized. Homogeneity of the U-235 and molybdenum in the metal foil is a challenge due to U-Mo casting process results in variations between adjacent cast U-Mo plates. LEU will not require less U-235 as previously believed due to self-shielding properties of U-238 requiring additional U-235 to be loaded in each fuel element. Although the overall dimensions of the ATR fuel element remain unchanged, the weight of the LEU ATR fuel element is 72% greater than a HEU ATR fuel element. During waste recovery and recycling efforts, separation of aluminum cladding from the HEU fuel meat is a relatively simple chemical dissolution, however, separation of the Zr diffusion barrier from the U-Mo fuel meat is significantly more challenging.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Tip-enhanced near-field optical microscope with side-on and ATR-mode sample excitation for super-resolution Raman imaging of surfaces

A tip-enhanced near-field optical microscope with side-on and attenuated total reflectance (ATR) excitation and collection is described and used to demonstrate sub-diffraction-limited (super-resolution) optical and chemical characterization of surfaces. ATR illumination is combined with an Au optical antenna tip to show that (i) the tip can quantitatively transduce the optical near-field (evanescent waves) above the surface by scattering photons into the far-field, (ii) the ATR geometry enables excitation and characterization of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs), whose associated optical fields are shown to enhance Raman scattering from a thin layer of copper phthalocyanine (CuPc), and (iii) SPPs can be used to plasmonically excite the tip for super-resolution chemical imaging of patterned CuPc via tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS). ATR-illumination TERS is also quantitatively compared with the more conventional side-on illumination scheme. In both cases, spatial resolution was better than 40 nm and tip on/tip off Raman enhancement factors were >6500. Furthermore, ATR illumination was shown to provide similar Raman signal levels at lower “effective” pump powers due to additional optical energy delivered by SPPs to the active region in the tip-surface gap.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

On High-Fluence Irradiation Hardening of Nine RPV Surveillance Steels in the UCSB ATR-2 Experiment: Implications for Extended-Life Embrittlement Predictions

Nine archival reactor pressure vessel (RPV) surveillance steels from commercial nuclear power plants were irradiated in the University of California, Santa Barbara Advanced Test Reactor 2 (ATR-2) experiment to evaluate irradiation embrittlement under low-flux surveillance capsule versus higher flux test reactor (ATR-2) conditions. The postirradiation measurements of irradiation hardening, measured as increases in yield stress (Δσy), and corresponding conversions of Δσy to Charpy V-notch 41-J transition temperature shifts (ΔTc) are compared with various embrittlement trend curve (ETC) model predictions for the nine steels. Tensile and converted shear punch and microhardness measurements of Δσy generally show a continuing increase between intermediate and high ATR-2 fluences. The Eason-Odette-Nanstad-Yamamoto and ASTM E900 ETC models underpredict embrittlement at the ATR-2 irradiation condition: irradiation temperature (Ti) of 292°C, neutron fluence (ϕt) of 1.4 × 1020 n/cm2 (E > 1 MeV), and neutron flux (ϕ) of 3.68 × 1012 n/cm2-s. On average, the French FIS and Japanese JAEC ETCs slightly overpredict the ATR-2 data. The increase in Δσy with higher fluence is primarily due to Ni-Mn-Si precipitates, which slowly evolve in both nearly copper-free and copper-bearing steels. Finally, a new Odette-Wells-Almirall-Yamamoto embrittlement model is shown that yields good predictions for the nine steels at high fluences (ϕt > 5.5 × 1019 n/cm2).

Nanstad, Randy K.↗

ON-LINE MONITORING OF I&C TRANSMITTERS AND SENSORS FOR CALIBRATION VERIFICATION AND RESPONSE TIME TESTING WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLEMENTED AT ATR

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) has always had a comprehensive procedure to verify the performance of its critical transmitters and sensors, including RTDs, and pressure, level, and flow transmitters. These transmitters and sensors have been periodically tested for response time and calibration verification to ensure accuracy. With implementation of online monitoring techniques at ATR, the calibration verification and response time testing of these transmitters and sensors are verified remotely, automatically, hands off, include more portions of the system, and can be performed at almost any time during process operations. The work was done under a DOE funded SBIR project carried out by AMS. As a result, ATR is now able to save the manpower that has been spent over the years on manual calibration verification and response time testing of its temperature and pressure sensors and refocus those resources towards more equipment reliability needs. More importantly, implementation of OLM will help enhance the overall availability, safety, and efficiency. Together with equipment reliability programs of ATR, the integration of OLM will also help with I&C aging management goals of the Department of Energy and long-time operation of ATR.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

On High-Fluence Irradiation Hardening of Nine RPV Surveillance Steels in the UCSB ATR-2 Experiment: Implications for Extended-Life Embrittlement Predictions

Nine archival reactor pressure vessel (RPV) surveillance steels from commercial nuclear power plants were irradiated in the University of California, Santa Barbara Advanced Test Reactor 2 (ATR-2) experiment to evaluate irradiation embrittlement under low-flux surveillance capsule versus higher flux test reactor (ATR-2) conditions. The postirradiation measurements of irradiation hardening, measured as increases in yield stress (Δσy), and corresponding conversions of Δσy to Charpy V-notch 41-J transition temperature shifts (ΔTc) are compared with various embrittlement trend curve (ETC) model predictions for the nine steels. Tensile and converted shear punch and microhardness measurements of Δσy generally show a continuing increase between intermediate and high ATR-2 fluences. The Eason-Odette-Nanstad-Yamamoto and ASTM E900 ETC models underpredict embrittlement at the ATR-2 irradiation condition: irradiation temperature (Ti) of 292°C, neutron fluence (ϕt) of 1.4 × 1020 n/cm2 (E > 1 MeV), and neutron flux (ϕ) of 3.68 × 1012 n/cm2-s. On average, the French FIS and Japanese JAEC ETCs slightly overpredict the ATR-2 data. The increase in Δσy with higher fluence is primarily due to Ni-Mn-Si precipitates, which slowly evolve in both nearly copper-free and copper-bearing steels. Finally, a new Odette-Wells-Almirall-Yamamoto embrittlement model is shown that yields good predictions for the nine steels at high fluences (ϕt > 5.5 × 1019 n/cm2).

Nanstad, Randy↗

On-line monitoring of I and C transmitters and sensors for calibration verification and response time testing was successfully implemented at ATR - 326

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) has always had a comprehensive procedure to verify the performance of its critical transmitters and sensors, including RTDs, and pressure, level, and flow transmitters. These transmitters and sensors have been periodically tested for response time and calibration verification to ensure accuracy. With implementation of on-line monitoring techniques at ATR, the calibration verification and response time testing of these transmitters and sensors are verified remotely, automatically, hands off, include more portions of the system, and can be performed at almost any time during process operations. The work was done under a DOE funded SBIR project carried out by AMS. As a result, ATR is now able to save the manpower that has been spent over the years on manual calibration verification and response time testing of its temperature and pressure sensors and refocus those resources towards more equipment reliability needs. More importantly, implementation of OLM will help enhance the overall availability, safety, and efficiency. Together with equipment reliability programs of ATR, the integration of OLM will also help with I and C aging management goals of the Department of Energy and long-time operation of ATR. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

An analysis method for experiment power in the ATR

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is used for testing and qualification of nuclear fuels and materials. The ATR has been irradiating the lead test assembly (LTA) for the planned Ki-Jang Research Reactor (KJRR) in Korea. Irradiation and subsequent Post-Irradiation Examination (PIE) of the LTA will lead to qualification of the fuel to support licensing activities. Qualification of the LTA requires the experiment to meet specific thermal and burn-up conditions. In particular, plate 20 of the experiment must obtain a heat flux between 137 and 200 W/cm{sup 2} with a target U-235 depletion of 79-84%. Due to the limited instrumentation and burn-up monitoring capabilities, assurance of meeting experiment goals is verified through modelling. In order to validate the experiment model using ATR operating data, a methodology was developed to compare the calculated experiment power with ATR power monitoring instrumentation. This paper discusses the methodology used to quantify the experiment power and uncertainty in the model based on ATR operating conditions. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Safety Considerations for Advanced Material Irradiation at the ATR

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is a light water reactor with aluminum-clad driver fuel. A primary mission of the ATR is to support the next generation of nuclear reactors. This support necessarily requires irradiation of advanced materials such as sodium, fuel salts, and metal eutectics. Irradiation of advanced materials in the ATR environment presents a challenge when completing accident analyses and demonstrating compliance to the Safety Analysis Report (SAR). Many advanced materials have the possibility to react with the ATR protective barriers such as the cladding or primary coolant system (PCS) boundary during postulated accident scenarios. Further, molten fuel experiments fall outside of the standard regulatory framework for dose consequence analyses. ATR is currently developing new safety analysis methods to support irradiation of advanced materials. The primary considerations for this development are 1) experiment containment design requirements, 2) primary coolant system response to an experiment containment failure, and 3) dose analyses for molten fuels.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

ATR Fuel Management

The sixth Core Internals Changeout (CIC) of ATR was completed on March 21, 2022, and Nuclear Testing (NT) commenced shortly thereafter. In support of NT, 235U flux wires were attached to flux wands using electrical tape and installed in water channels 2, 6, 11, 15 and 19 in each of the 40 ATR Mark VII fuel elements that comprise an ATR core to perform low power flux measurements during ATR Cycle 170CIC NT-3. The flux wands were fabricated from Poly (Methyl Methacrylate), or PMMA. Irradiated cobalt capsules were loaded in the ATR Northeast Irradiation Housing Assembly (NEIHA), the East Flux Trap (EFT), South Flux Trap (SFT), inboard A-positions and various H-positions as a 170CIC NT-3 core reactivity hold-down mechanism. The PMMA flux wands received significant gamma dose from the irradiated cobalt during NT-3 which caused discoloration, embrittlement and swelling of the flux wands. The removal of the degraded flux wands from the 0.078 in. wide by 50 in. long fuel element coolant channels has been a unique challenge. This presentation summarizes the cleaning techniques used to remove the flux wand debris from the elements, an aggressive PMMA irradiation experiment performed concomitantly with initial cleaning efforts, and planned inspection and qualification techniques that will be applied in the future to potentially requalify the impacted elements for re-use.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

ANS Winter 2024 Summary: MCCAFE: The Monte Carlo Constructor for ATR Fuel Elements

The Irradiation Experiment Neutronics Analysis Department at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has implemented a new analysis workflow for experiments in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). One key piece of this workflow is the Monte Carlo Constructor for ATR Fuel Elements, or MCCAFE. For each ATR operating cycle, the Reactor and Nuclear Safety Engineering (RNSE) Department first solves the core in eigenvalue mode and depletes the driver fuel materials. In a separate calculation, neutronics analysts model and deplete the materials of one or more irradiation experiments, usually in a series of fixed-source Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) models of the ATR for neutron transport calculations. It was desirable to use the results of the former calculations to inform the models of the latter. MCCAFE is a Python program developed using American Society of Mechanical Engineers Nuclear Quality Assurance-1 procedures at INL. Its purpose is to take the calculated results from the RNSE depletion solutions and the measured or projected operating parameters from the Nuclear Data Management and Analysis System (NDMAS) to generate fixed-source models of the ATR core at given points in time across one or more cycles.

99 - GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Reducing Uncertainty in Hydrodynamic Modeling of ATR Experiments Via Flow Testing, Validation, and Optimization

The development, characterization, and qualification testing of nuclear fuel at Idaho National Laboratory’s Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) requires extensive design and analysis activities prior to the insertion of an irradiation experiment in-pile. Significant effort is made in the design and development phase of all in-pile experiments to ensure that the maximum feasible impacts of all necessary experimental requirements are satisfied. The advancement of fuel, cladding, and in-reactor materials technology in recent years has introduced complexities associated with the design and construct of in-pile experiments necessitating deeper understanding of boundary conditions and increasingly comprehensive observations resulting from the experiment. Each unique experiment must be assessed for neutronics response, thermal/hydraulic/hydrodynamic performance, and structural integrity. This is accomplished either analytically, computationally, or experimentally, or some combination thereof, prior to insertion into the ATR. The various effects are interrelated to various degrees, such as the case with the experiment temperature affecting the thermal cross section of the fuel or the increased temperature of the experiment’s materials reducing the mechanical strength of the assemblies. Additionally, the feedback between the experiment’s response to a reactor transient could alter the neutron flux profile of the reactor during the transient. Each experiment must therefore undergo a barrage of analyses to assure the ATR operational safety review committee that the insertion and irradiation of the experiment will not detrimentally affect the safe operational envelope of the reactor. In many cases, the nuclear fuel being tested can be double-encapsulated to ensure safety margins are adequately addressed, whereas failed fuel would be encased in a protective capsule. In other cases, the experiments can be inserted in a self-contained loop that passes through the reactor core, remaining isolated from the primary coolant. In the case of research reactor fuel, however, the fuel plates must be tested in direct contact with the reactor coolant, and being fuel designed for high neutron fluxes, they are inherently power-dense plates. The combination of plate geometry, high-power density, and direct contact with primary coolant creates a scenario where the neutronic/thermomechanic/hydrodynamic characteristics of the fuel plates are tightly coupled, necessitating as complete characterization as possible to support the safety and programmatic assessments, thus enabling a successful experiment. This paper explores the efforts of the U.S. High-Performance Research Reactor program to thermomechanically/hydromechanically characterize the program’s wide variety of experiments, which range from stacks of miniplate capsules to full-sized, geometrically representative curved plates. Special attention is given to instances where the combination of experimental characterization and analytical assessment has reduced uncertainties of the safety margins, allowing experiments to be irradiated that would otherwise not have passed the rigorous qualification process for irradiation in the ATR. In some cases, the combined processes have exposed flow and heat transfer characteristics that would have been missed using historical methods, which allows for more accurate and representative postirradiation assessments.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Measured Thermal and Fast Neutron Fluence Rates ATR Cycles 171A ATF (Rev. 1)

This report contains the thermal (2200 m/s) and fast (E>1MeV) neutron fluence rate data for ATR Cycle 171A ATF which were measured by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) as requested by the Power Reactor Programs (ATR Experiments) Radiation Measurements Work Order. This report contains fluence rate values corresponding to the particular elevations (relative to the 80-ft. core elevation) where the measurements were taken. The data in this report consists of (1) a table of the ATR power history and distribution, (2) a listing of the calculated thermal and fast neutron fluence rates, and (3) plots of calculated both the thermal and fast neutron fluence rates. The fluence rates reported are for the average power levels given in the table of power history and distribution. During the irradiation of Cycle 152A, the RML performed additional flux measurements to assess core reconfiguration issues. Measurements using cadmium covered as well as bare neutron monitors in the Southwest, Southeast, and H positions of the Center lobe were performed to determine the division in neutron energy between epithermal and thermal neutrons. This is defined as the resonance correction defined in this report. It is used to quantify both thermal and fast neutron flux. For more information please refer to letter, “RADIATION MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF IN CORE ATR PHYSICS TESTING DURING CYCLE 152A” dated January 24, 2013, to Casey Stengel from C. C. Jensen. The measured values documented in RML Procedure, “ACMM-3600, Flux Monitoring,” will be used indefinitely until further measurements supersede the current values.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Measured Thermal and Fast Neutron Fluence Rates ATR Cycles 171A IR TMIST 3B

This report contains the thermal (2200 m/s) and fast (E>1MeV) neutron fluence rate data for ATR Cycle 171A which were measured by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) as requested by the Power Reactor Programs (ATR Experiments) Radiation Measurements Work Order. This report contains fluence rate values corresponding to the particular elevations (relative to the 80-ft. core elevation) where the measurements were taken. The data in this report consists of (1) a table of the ATR power history and distribution, (2) a listing of the calculated thermal and fast neutron fluence rates, and (3) plots of calculated both the thermal and fast neutron fluence rates. The fluence rates reported are for the average power levels given in the table of power history and distribution. During the irradiation of Cycle 152A, the RML performed additional flux measurements to assess core reconfiguration issues. Measurements using cadmium covered as well as bare neutron monitors in the Southwest, Southeast, and H positions of the Center lobe were performed to determine the division in neutron energy between epithermal and thermal neutrons. This is defined as the resonance correction defined in this report. It is used to quantify both thermal and fast neutron flux. For more information please refer to letter, “RADIATION MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF IN CORE ATR PHYSICS TESTING DURING CYCLE 152A” dated January 24, 2013, to Casey Stengel from C. C. Jensen. The measured values documented in RML Procedure, “ACMM-3600, Flux Monitoring,” will be used indefinitely until further measurements supersede the current values.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Modeling of ATR fuel in DOE Standard Canisters with Helium Backfilled Condition

Road-ready and final disposition packaging configurations for the advanced test reactor (ATR) fuel dictates storage within helium backfilled sealed DOE standard canisters. These sealed canisters are intended for extened (>50 year) dry storage). The typical packaging configuration for the 15-foot DOE canisters places 10 ATR elements within a Type 1a basket, and three baskets are loaded within each DOE canister. During in-reactor operations and cooling pond storage conditions, oxyhydroxide layers form on the surface of the aluminum clad fuel. These layers produce hydrogen gas over time due to the fuel’s radiation field. As part of the packing procedure, the ATR fuel should be dried to remove any residual physio-/chemi- sorbed water from the surface. As testing to the effectiveness of the drying procedure is still underway, this modeling will include results at fully saturated and fully dried conditions. In previous modeling efforts, the G-value for the production of hydrogen from the oxyhydroxide layers was assumed to be in argon environments as measured by Task 2 - Oxyhydroxide Layer Radiolytic Gas Generation Resolution. Previous experimental testing showed differences in the hydrogen generated based on the gaseous environment. In the associated experimental work, Task 2 - Oxyhydroxide Layer Radiolytic Gas Generation Resolution, additional tests were completed in a helium environment, and updated G-values for the radiolytic production of hydrogen from the oxyhydroxide layers were provided. These values are 28% and 58% higher than values for argon. In addition, a change to the modeling of the oxyhydroxide radiolysis has been made from previous reports. This change assumes the dependency of the dose rate on the overall reaction rate is applied to the total weight of the sample, rather than to just the weight of the oxyhydroxide layer. This decreases the dependency of the radiolytic reaction on the thickness of the oxyhydroxide layer. For a nominal scenario of stored ATR fuel, assuming the chemi-/physio- sorbed water have been fully removed, the internal canister pressure increases to 1.61 atm over a 50 year period, with a hydrogen mole percentage of 21%. As in previous modeling, any oxygen present is in negligible amounts (<1 ppt). If a small amount residual air is present, nitric acid can form up to 1300 ppm. For a scenario with high fuel decay heat, the model shows internal pressure increasing to 2.1 atm, with 39.3 mole percentage of hydrogen. In a scenario where significant chemi-/physio- sorbed water is present within the corrosion layer, the nominal scenario shows a pressure increase to 2.54 atm, with 21.1 mole percent hydrogen. The high decay heat case shows a pressure increase to 3.18 atm with 39.9 mole percent hydrogen.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

As-Run Physics Analysis for the AGC-4 Experiment Irradiated in the ATR

This Engineering Calculations Analysis Report (ECAR) documents the results of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) detailed physics analyses performed to calculate the displacements per atom (DPA) and the fast neutron fluence (E > 0.1 MeV) of the Advanced Graphite Creep (AGC) experiment, AGC-4, irradiated in the ATR East Flux Trap (EFT) (see Figure 1) during ATR Cycle 157D, 158A, 162A, 162B, 164A, 164B, 166A, and Cycle 166B. This ECAR also reports the neutron and photon heat rates for the materials of the AGC-4 experiment for ATR Cycle 158A (timestep 19), which provides to the maximum heating. The results for these evaluations and analysis are reported herein. The AGC-4 as-run specimen neutron fast fluence (E > 0.1 MeV), DPA, and material heat rate calculations were performed using a general-purpose Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code. All calculated results are tabulated herein.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

ECAR-3051 As-Run Physics Analysis For The AGC-3 Experiment Irradiated In The ATR

This Engineering Calculations Analysis Report (ECAR) documents the results of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) detailed physics analyses performed to calculate the displacements per atom (DPA) and the fast neutron fluence (E > 0.1 MeV) of the Advanced Graphite Creep (AGC) experiment, AGC-3, irradiated in the ATR East Flux Trap (EFT) (see Figure 1) during ATR Cycle 152B, Cycle 154B, Cycle 155A, and Cycle 155B. This ECAR also reports the neutron and photon heat rates for the materials of the AGC-3 experiment for ATR Cycle 152B. The results for these evaluations and analysis are reported herein.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

ECAR-2291 AS-RUN PHYSICS ANALYSIS FOR THE AGC-2 EXPERIMENT IRRADIATED IN THE ATR

This Engineering Calculations Analysis Report (ECAR) documents the results of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) detailed physics analyses performed to calculate the displacements per atom (DPA) and the fast neutron fluence (E > 0.1 MeV) of the Advanced Graphite Creep (AGC) experiment, AGC-2, irradiated in the ATR South Flux Trap (SFT) (see Figure 1) during ATR Cycle 149A, Cycle 149B, Cycle 150B, Cycle 151A, and Cycle 151B. This ECAR also reports the neutron and photon heat rates for the materials of the AGC-2 experiment for ATR Cycle 149B. The results for these evaluations and analysis are reported herein.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗