DOE OSTI2022
The ETF ammonia tolerant grout waste form was developed by the Vitreous State Laboratory (VSL) to stabilize ammonium and thereby prevent emission of ammonia vapor during solidification of an ammonium-rich, concentrated sodium sulfate aqueous waste stream generated at the Hanford Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). VSL personnel did not observe expansion in samples prepared during the waste form development work. However, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) personnel detected expansion, in a few ETF grout samples, up to ~ 20 percent vertical expansion, while preforming work scope to evaluate the effect of ETF brine compositional ranges on the precipitation and solidification processes. The initial work requests can be found in Washington River Protection Services (WRPS) Statement of Work (SOW, Requisitions #: 339922 Revisions 0 and 1, March 11, 2021, and November 2021, respectively. As a result of the waste form expansion observed by SRNL, additional evaluation was requested by WRPS SOW Requisitions #: 356730 Revision 0 and Revision 1, February 1, 2022, and July 11, 2022, respectively. The goal of these requests was to determine whether differences in the slags and / or in sample preparation protocols used by VSL and SRNL were the cause of the expansion observed in the SRNL samples. G. Chen, WRPS, arranged a materials exchange between VSL and SRNL and coordinated the VSL protocol(s) for grouting and curing 1L batches of Base Case ETF base case simulant. Materials were exchanged between VSL and SRNL. Both laboratories performed the VSL struvite precipitation-solidification protocol and cured samples for at least 28 days. Differences in VSL and SRNL slag compositions, mineralogy and particle size results in themselves or combined were determined to not be the cause of the expansion because all samples expanded regardless of whether the VSL or SRNL slags were used. The fundamental cause of the observed expansion could not be attributed to minor variations in the following: 1) chemistry of the slag and other reagents, 2) container wall thickness, 3) ambient bench top curing conditions at VSL and SRNL, 4) pH adjustments to 7 ± a few tenths of unit, nor 5) stirring time between the precipitation and solidification process steps. Additional observations include: grout samples prepared with VSL slag expanded less than those prepared with the SRNL slag and, based on a very limited sample set, some samples stirred for longer times expanded less than those stirred for 20 minutes.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗