QuantEM: The quantum error management compiler
SF-25-092 The software propose a toolkit for error management in the quantum computing software stack.
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
SF-25-092 The software propose a toolkit for error management in the quantum computing software stack.
The overall goals of the AEDAM project were to fundamentally transform software transient-error detection through the design of configurable specialized detectors, quantitative characterization of hardware resilience and software vulnerabilities, and composition of the specialized detectors to most efficiently protect the whole program. Within this scope, UT Austin's research contribution related to enabling and studying the composition of detectors and possible different hardware errors, specifically: (1) developed the Hamartia open-source error injection framework that is designed to make composition studies simple, and (2) develop the methodology and demonstrate the potential benefits of error detector composition.
The Radionuclide Analysis Kit (RNAK), my team’s most recent nuclide identification software, is entering the testing phase. A question arises: will removing rare nuclides from the software’s library improve its overall performance? An affirmative response indicates fundamental errors in the software’s framework, while a negative response confirms the effectiveness of the software’s key machine learning algorithms. After thorough testing, I found that the performance of RNAK cannot be improved with the library choice effect, thus verifying the effectiveness of RNAK’s algorithms—multiple linear regression, Bayesian network using the Viterbi algorithm, and branch and bound search.
Historical data collection on nuclear fuel cladding materials has focused on generating a statistically significant amount of data to assess the material and its failure behavior. Furthermore, data generated to support material model and failure criteria development were previously posttest evaluations, so a large number of tests was required to gain new understanding. A way to expedite this process is to develop techniques capable of generating large, high-fidelity data sets from a single test with lower uncertainty or quantified uncertainty. One such example of this approach is Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s use of modified burst tests (MBTs) to analyze the mechanical behavior and failure conditions of cladding during a simulated reactivity-initiated accident (RIA). Each test incorporates digital image correlation (DIC) analysis techniques that are used to assess the accumulated strain in situ, as well as eventual cladding failure. This work has been fruitful in defining strain-to-failure conditions for materials like silicon carbide (SiC) fiber–reinforced/SiC matrix composite tubes (SiC/SiC), iron-chromium-aluminum (FeCrAl) alloy tubes, and chromium-coated Zircaloy-4 tubes. However, there are numerous DIC software available, including open-source and proprietary software. The different DIC software use various algorithms to process images and calculate displacement values. Using these different software and algorithms can lead to varying results, and perhaps larger-than-expected uncertainties. In the present study, previously published MBT data encompassing a variety of test conditions were reanalyzed with two different DIC software to assess the variance in the calculated strain results. The data consisted of SiC/SiC, FeCrAl, and chromium-coated Zircaloy-4 tubes. Plots of the calculated strains during the transient revealed good agreement between the two DIC software. The average root-mean-square errors between the two software was 0.20% strain, which is slightly larger than a previously reported error value for these tests. In conclusion, this variance in results is low enough that this analysis method can be used for code validation.
This paper develops a methodology for quantifying software common cause failures (CCFs) in digital instrumentation and control (I&C) systems of nuclear power plants. To support the transition of analog I&C systems to digital in nuclear power plants, probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) techniques are used. The hardware components of the I&C systems have reliability databases that can be used in the PRA studies. However, the failure data for redundant software components of the systems is sparse. Failure of components constitutes a CCF, wherein two or more components or systems fail due to a single shared cause and coupling mechanism. This paper proposes a quantification approach that can simultaneously model hardware and software components, incorporate the CCFs of software systems in the models, and bridge the gap between the failure quantification of models and the development of CCF parametric databases. We demonstrate the dual error propagation method (DEPM) by developing I&C systems failure models for a representative digital reactor trip system. The DEPM models are built to simulate the control and data flows within the systems and can accommodate failure states. By expanding DEPM to software CCFs, we generated alpha factor parameter estimates for each of the modeled error propagation mechanisms.
The MAMA (Morphological Analysis for Material Attribution) software was developed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory funded through the National Technical Nuclear Forensics Center in the Department of Homeland Security. The software allows images to be analysed and quantified. The largest project I worked on was to quantify images of plutonium oxides and ammonium diuranates prepared by the group with the software and provide analyses on the particles of each sample. Images were quantified through MAMA, with a color analysis, a lexicon description and powder x-ray diffraction. Through this we were able to visually see a difference between some of the syntheses. An additional project was to revise the manual for MAMA to help streamline training and provide useful tips to users to more quickly become acclimated to using the software. The third project investigated expanding the scope of MAMA and finding a statistically relevant baseline for the particulates through the analysis of maps in the software and using known measurements to compare the error associated with the software. During this internship, I worked on several different projects dealing with the MAMA software. The revision of the usermanual for the MAMA software was the first project I was able to work and collaborate on. I first learned how to use the software by getting instruction from a skilled user at the laboratory, Dan Schwartz, and by using the existing user manual and examples. After becoming accustomed to the program, I started to go over the manual to correct and change items that were not as useful or descriptive as they could have been. I also added in tips that I learned as I explored the software. The updated manual was also worked on by several others who have been developing the program. The goal of these revisions was to ensure the most concise and simple directions to the software were available to future users. By incorporating tricks and shortcuts that I discovered and picked up from watching other users into the user guide, I believe that anyone who utilizes the software will be able to quickly understand the best way to analyze their image and use the tools the program offers to achieve useful results.
A nonlinear least-squares method for refining a parametric expression describing the estimated errors of reflection intensities in serial crystallographic (SX) data is presented. This approach, which is similar to that used in the rotation method of crystallographic data collection at synchrotrons, propagates error estimates from photon-counting statistics to the merged data. Here, it is demonstrated that the application of this approach to SX data provides better SAD phasing ability, enabling the autobuilding of a protein structure that had previously failed to be built. Estimating the error in the merged reflection intensities requires the understanding and propagation of all of the sources of error arising from the measurements. One type of error, which is well understood, is the counting error introduced when the detector counts X-ray photons. Thus, if other types of random errors (such as readout noise) as well as uncertainties in systematic corrections (such as from X-ray attenuation) are completely understood, they can be propagated along with the counting error, as appropriate. In practice, most software packages propagate as much error as they know how to model and then include error-adjustment terms that scale the error estimates until they explain the variance among the measurements. If this is performed carefully, then during SAD phasing likelihood-based approaches can make optimal use of these error estimates, increasing the chance of a successful structure solution. In serial crystallography, SAD phasing has remained challenging, with the few examples of de novo protein structure solution each requiring many thousands of diffraction patterns. Here, the effects of different methods of treating the error estimates are estimated and it is shown that using a parametric approach that includes terms proportional to the known experimental uncertainty, the reflection intensity and the squared reflection intensity to improve the error estimates can allow SAD phasing even from weak zinc anomalous signal.
Background: The quality of Digital Volume Correlation (DVC) full-field displacement measurements depends directly on the characteristics of the X-ray Computed Tomography (XCT) equipment, and scan procedures used to acquire the tomographic images. Objective: In this work, we seek to experimentally study the effects of XCT equipment and tomographic scan procedures on the quality of these images for DVC analysis, and to survey the level of DVC error that may be achieved using standard XCT operating procedures. Methods: Six participants in an interlaboratory study acquired high-quality XCT scans of a syntactic foam before and after rigid body motion. The resulting images were correlated using commercial DVC software to quantify error sources due to random image noise, reconstruction artifacts, as well as systematic spatial or temporal distortion. Results: In the absence of rigid body motion, the standard deviation of the displacement measurements ranged from 0.012 to 0.043 voxels using a moderate subvolume size, indicating that subvoxel measurement resolution could readily be achieved with a variety of XCT equipment and scan recipes. Comparison of consecutive scans without rigid body motion showed transient dilatational displacement gradients due to self-heating of the X-ray source and/or thermal expansion of the foam. Evaluation of the scans after rigid body motion showed significant, machine-specific spatial distortion in the displacement fields of up to 0.5 voxels; new approaches to remove this error need to be developed. Conclusions: Analysis of the scan protocols used in the interlaboratory study, as well as a complementary parametric sensitivity study, showed that the DVC error was strongly influenced by the XCT equipment, but could be mitigated by adjusting the total scan duration.
This software leverages transfer learning to analyze atom probe tomography (APT) data. It is trained on synthetic data and then applies this knowledge to predict the optimal number of clusters for a given APT dataset. Initially, the software used preliminary clustering to estimate the general structure of the data. Based on this, it provides suggestions for key parameters like minimum cluster size and minimum number of points. These parameters are critical for algorithms like HDBSCAN, ensuring accurate cluster formation without the need for trial-and-error testing. The software runs on High-Performance computing (HPC) systems, enabling fast, scalable analysis of large APT datasets, ultimately saving time and improving the reliability of clustering outcomes.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) encourages the use of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) technology in all regulatory matters, to the extent supported by the state-of-the-art in PRA methods and data. Although much has been accomplished in the area of risk-informed regulation, risk assessment for digital systems has not been fully developed. The NRC established a plan for research on digital systems to identify and develop methods, analytical tools, and regulatory guidance for (1) including models of digital systems in the PRA's of nuclear power plants (NPPs), and, (2) incorporating digital systems in the NRC's risk-informed licensing and oversight activities. Under NRC's sponsorship, Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) explored approaches for addressing the failures of digital instrumentation and control (I and C) systems in the current NPP PRA framework. Specific areas investigated included PRA modeling digital hardware , development of a philosophical basis for defining software failure , and identification of desirable attributes of quantitative software reliability methods . Based on the earlier research, statistical testing is considered a promising method for quantifying software reliability. It is widely recognized that software failures are due to the triggering of pre-existing defects by the software's operational environment. Software defects can arise from errors made in user requirements or coding errors introduced during the developmental process. The software's operational environment includes factors such as the time history of digital system inputs, communication interfaces, the internal state of the digital system, and external conditions. Thus, software reliability is a function of both the number of pre-existing defects and the presence of a triggering condition caused by the manner in which the software is used. In this paper, we describe a statistical software-testing approach for quantifying software reliability and applied it to the loop-operating control system (LOCS) of an experimental loop of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The work involved collaboration between BNL and INL. The objectives of the study include: (1) Development of a statistical testing approach for estimating software failure probability on demand, the results of which are suitable for including in a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA); and, (2) Application of the approach to the LOCS to estimate its failure probability, and obtain insights into the feasibility, practicality, and usefulness of the estimation in models of digital systems for inclusion in nuclear power plants' PRAs. (authors)
Nonlinear modeling and optimization is a valuable tool for aiding decisions by engineering practitioners, but programming an optimization problem based on a complex electrical, mechanical, or chemical process is a time-consuming and error-prone activity. Therefore, there is a need for model analysis and debugging tools that can detect and diagnose modeling errors. One such tool is the Dulmage–Mendelsohn decomposition, which identifies structurally under- and over-determined subsets in systems of equations and variables by partitioning the bipartite graph of the system. This work provides the necessary background to understand the Dulmage–Mendelsohn decomposition and its application to the analysis of nonlinear optimization problems, demonstrates its use in diagnosing a variety of modeling errors, and introduces software implementations for analyzing nonlinear optimization problems in the Pyomo and JuMP algebraic modeling languages.
In the age of long read sequencing, genomics researchers now have access to accurate repetitive DNA sequence (including satellites) that, due to the limitations of short read-sequencing, could previously be observed only as unmappable fragments. Tools that annotate repetitive sequence are now more important than ever, so that we can better understand newly uncovered repetitive sequences, and also so that we can mitigate errors in bioinformatic software caused by those repetitive sequences. To that end, we introduce the 1.0 release of our tool for identifying and annotating locally repetitive sequence, ULTRA Locates Tandemly Repetitive Areas (ULTRA). ULTRA is fast enough to use as part of an efficient annotation pipeline, produces state-of-the-art reliable coverage of repetitive regions containing many mutations, and provides interpretable statistics and labels for repetitive regions.
Purpose: To test spatial and dosimetric accuracy of small cranial target irradiation based on 1.5 T MRI scans using static arcs with MLC-defined fields Methods: A plastic (PMMA) phantom simulating a small brain lesion was mounted on a GammaKnife headframe equipped with MRI localizer. The lesion was a 3 mm long, 3.175 mm diameter cylindrical cavity filled with MRI contrast. Radiochromic film passing through the cavity was marked with pin pricks at the cavity center. The cavity was contoured on an MRI image and fused with CT to simulate treatment of a lesion not visible on CT. The transfer of the target to CT involved registering the MRI contrast cannels of the localizer that were visible on both modalities. Treatments were planned to deliver 800 cGy to the cavity center using multiple static arcs with 5.0×2.4 mm MLC-defined fields. The phantom was aligned on a STx accelerator by registering the conebeam CT with the planning CT. Films from coronal and sagittal planes were scanned and evaluated using ImageJ software Results: Geographic errors in treatment based on 1.5 T scans agreed within 0.33, −0.27 and 1.21 mm in the vertical, lateral and longitudinal dimensions, respectively. The doses delivered to the cavity center were 7.2% higher than planned. The dose distributions were similar to those of a GammaKnife. Conclusion: Radiation can be delivered with an accelerator at mm accuracy to small cranial targets based on 1.5 MRI scans fused to CTs using a standard GammaKnife headframe and MRI localizer. MLC-defined static arcs produce isodose lines very similar to the GammaKnife.
This program takes the users' Input data and fits a linear regression to it using the prescription presented by Mahon (1996). Compared to the commonly used York fit, this method has the correct prescription for measurement error propagation. This software should facilitate the proper fitting of measurements with a simple Interface.
MGARD is a software providing error-controlled lossy compression and data refactoring based on multi-grid theories. It transforms floating-point scientific data into a multilevel representation, followed by quantization and lossless encoding processes, resulting in a self-describing compressed buffer. It supports diverse data topologies, error control norms, and computing architectures.
Efficient data compression is becoming increasingly critical for storing scientific data because many scientific applications produce vast amounts of data. This paper presents an end-to-end algorithmic and software pipeline for data compression that guarantees both error bounds on primary data (PD) and derived data, known as Quantities of Interest (QoI).We demonstrate the effectiveness of the pipeline by compressing fusion data generated by a large-scale fusion code, XGC, which produces tens of petabytes of data in a single day. We demonstrate that the compression is conducted by setting aside computational resources known as staging nodes, and does not impact the simulation performance. For efficient parallel I/O, the pipeline uses ADIOS2, which many codes such as XGC already use for their parallel I/O. We show that our approach can compress the data by two orders of magnitude while guaranteeing high accuracy on both the PD and the QoIs. Further, the amount of resources required by compression is a few percent of the resources required by simulation while ensuring that the compression time for each stage is less than the corresponding simulation time.This pipeline consists of three main steps. The first step decomposes the data using domain decomposition into small subdomains. Each subdomain is then compressed independently to achieve a high level of parallelism. The second step uses existing techniques that guarantee error bounds on the primary data for each subdomain. The third step uses a post-processing optimization technique based on Lagrange multipliers to reduce the QoI errors for data corresponding to each subdomain. The Lagrange multipliers generated can be further quantized or truncated to increase the compression level. All of the above characteristics of our approach make it highly practical to apply on-the-fly compression while guaranteeing errors on QoIs that are critical to the scientists.
With the objective of providing the synchrotron and free-electron-laser communities with rapid turnaround and low prices for the highest quality and most advanced gratings and diffractive-focusing optics, LumArray has made specific improvements to its ZP-150 maskless photolithography system, which is based on Zone-Plate-Array Lithography (ZPAL), a technology unique to Lumarray. ZPAL’s advantages include an ability to correct in software for systematic patterning errors. Emphasis was placed on interferometric measurements of various contributors to patterning errors using Fizeau interferometry and a Mireau technique that was developed specifically for measuring errors within a micron-scale area. Average line-placement error was reduced below 20 nm using both pattern-file distortion and address-grid modification. The preferred implementation, address-grid modification, is hardware-based and requires no user intervention while also correcting more types of error. With continued iteration and refinement of the error measurements, we anticipate achieving global line-placement error below10nm. In order to investigate line-edge smoothness and high-frequency line-placement errors, a scheme for inspecting micron-sized areas was invented and implemented based on Mireau interferometry. This enabled the various contributions to be separately evaluated and measured. These included: exposure-dose variation, pattern-writing strategy and errors in the positioning of the microlenses. Deleterious crosstalk between microlenses was minimized via a pattern-dependent software modification. The impact of exposure threshold was revealed and adjustment made. The impact of address-grid fineness on line-edge roughness was likewise shown. Lastly, techniques were developed to measure and correct errors in the positioning of microlenses within the array. We expect final calibration of microlens positions to within 5nm.
Purpose: Radiation oncology relies on rapidly evolving technology and highly complex processes. The US Food and Drug Administration collects reports of adverse events related to medical devices. We sought to characterize all events involving radiation oncology devices (RODs) from the US Food and Drug Administration's postmarket surveillance Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, comparing these with non–radiation oncology devices. Methods and Materials: MAUDE data on RODs from 1991 to 2015 were sorted into 4 product categories (external beam, brachytherapy, planning systems, and simulation systems) and 5 device problem categories (software, mechanical, electrical, user error, and dose delivery impact). Outcomes included whether the device was evaluated by the manufacturer, adverse event type, remedial action, problem code, device age, and time since 510(k) approval. Descriptive statistics were performed with linear regression of time-series data. Results for RODs were compared with those for other devices by the Pearson χ{sup 2} test for categorical data and 2-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for distributions. Results: There were 4234 ROD and 4,985,698 other device adverse event reports. Adverse event reports increased over time, and events involving RODs peaked in 2011. Most ROD reports involved external beam therapy (50.8%), followed by brachytherapy (24.9%) and treatment planning systems (21.6%). The top problem types were software (30.4%), mechanical (20.9%), and user error (20.4%). RODs differed significantly from other devices in each outcome (P<.001). RODs were more likely to be evaluated by the manufacturer after an event (46.9% vs 33.0%) but less likely to be recalled (10.5% vs 37.9%) (P<.001). Device age and time since 510(k) approval were shorter among RODs (P<.001). Conclusions: Compared with other devices, RODs may experience adverse events sooner after manufacture and market approval. Close postmarket surveillance, improved software design, and manufacturer–user training may help mitigate these events.