SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Transfer Vehicle”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS1986

Orbital transfer vehicle launch operations study. Volume 2: Detailed summary

A series of Operational Design Drivers were identified. Several of these could have significant impact(s) on program costs. These recommendations, for example, include such items as: complete factory assembly and checkout prior to shipment to the ground launch site to make significant reductions in time required at the launch site as well as overall manpower required to do this work; minimize use of nonstandard equipment when orbiter provided equipment is available; and require commonality (or interchangeability) of subsystem equipment elements that are common to the space station, Orbit Maneuvering Vehicles, and/or Orbit Transfer Vehicles. Several additional items were identified that will require a significant amount of management attention (and direction) to resolve. Key elements of the space based processing plans are discussed.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1985

Manrating orbital transfer vehicle propulsion

The expended capabilities for Orbital Transfer Vehicles (OTV) which will be needed to meet increased payload requirements for transporting materials and men to geosynchronous orbit are discussed. The requirement to provide manrating offers challenges and opportunities to the propulsion system designers. The propulsion approaches utilized in previous manned space vehicles of the United States are reviewed. The principals of reliability analysis are applied to the Orbit Transfer Vehicle. Propulsion system options are characterized in terms of the test requirements to demonstrate reliability goals and are compared to earlier vehicle approaches.

Cooper, L. P.↗

NASA NTRS1985

Manrating orbital transfer vehicle propulsion

Cooper, L. P.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Atmospheric Mining in the Outer Solar System: Interplanetary Transfer Vehicles, In-Situ Resource Utilization, and Moon Mining Issues

Atmospheric mining in the outer solar system has been investigated as a means of fuel production for high energy propulsion and power. Fusion fuels such as Helium 3 (3He) and deuterium can be wrested from the atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune and either returned to Earth or used in-situ for energy production. Helium 3 and deuterium were the primary gases of interest with hydrogen being the primary propellant for nuclear thermal solid core and gas core rocket-based atmospheric flight. A series of analyses were undertaken to investigate resource capturing aspects of atmospheric mining in the outer solar system. This included the gas capturing rate, storage options, and different methods of direct use of the captured gases. While capturing 3He, large amounts of hydrogen and 4He are produced. With these two additional gases, the potential for fueling small and large fleets of additional exploration and exploitation vehicles exists. Analyses of orbital transfer vehicles (OTVs), landers, and in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) mining factories are included. Preliminary observations are presented on near-optimal selections of moon base orbital locations, OTV power levels, and OTV and lander rendezvous points. Aerospacecraft with closed cycle gas core propulsion are used to capture the 3He and deuterium from the outer planet atmospheres. Water ice on the outer planet moons has been identified as critical resources for refueling the moon landers and the nuclear electric OTVs. The numbers of interplanetary transfer vehicles (ITVs) and the launch vehicles will be presented. Preliminary design parameters for the ITVs and their payload limits will be assessed. The number of mining machines and their associated issues are addressed.

chemical propulsion↗

NASA NTRS1984

Performance aerodynamics of aeroassisted orbital transfer vehicles

A method for predicting the performance aerodynamics of aeroassisted orbital transfer vehicles was developed based on techniques that were used in the aerodynamic databook of the Space Shuttle orbiter and theories from the Hypersonic Arbitrary Body Program. The method spans the entire flight profile of the aeroassisted orbital transfer vehicles from the extreme high altitude non-continuum regime to the highly viscous continuum regime. Results from this method are compared with flight data from the Shuttle orbiter, Apollo Capsule, and the Viking Aeroshell. Finally, performance aerodynamics are estimated for three aeroassisted orbital transfer vehicles that range from low to high lift-to-drag ratio configurations.

Wilhite, A. W.↗

NASA NTRS1989

United States orbital transfer vehicle programs

Five U.S. orbital transfer vehicles carrying spacecraft to higher energy orbits than achievable by the Space Shuttle or various expandable launch vehicles are studied. These vehicles are the Payload Assist Module-Delta (PAM-D), an upgraded version designated PAM-DII, the Inertial Upper Stage (IUS), the U.S. Transfer Orbit Stage (TOS), and the Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle (OMV). Capabilities range from providing spacecraft with only a preprogrammed perigee velocity additions to man-in-the-loop remote controlled spacecraft rendezvous, docking, retrieval, and return to a space base. The PAM-D, PAM-DII, and IUS are mature vehicles currently available for mission support. Characteristics, flight records, and costs are defined. The TOS is being commercially developed while the OMV is government developed. The TOS and OMV capabilities, constraints, and costs are reviewed.

Gunn, Charles R.↗

NASA NTRS1990

Transfer Vehicle Accommodations at Transportation Node

There are three primary objectives of this study. The first is to identify time-phased accommodation capabilities necessary to support the civil space exploration initiatives. These initiatives include the Lunar and Mars missions in the Human Exploration Initiative (HEI). Primary accommodation requirements include integration and assembly of vehicle components and systems on-orbit, and protection of these vehicles from the space environment, particularly debris. Secondly, this study will develop accommodation concepts, define impacts (hooks and scars) to Space Station Freedom (SSF), identify staging/servicing requirements, and identify required technology advances. Finally, the majority of the study effort has been devoted to conducting a trade study to evaluate alternative transfer vehicle accommodation concepts. These concepts have ranged from basing all transfer vehicle accommodations for both Lunar and Mars transfer vehicles at SSF, to basing all accommodation capabilities off SSF. Two steps are shown in the NASA reference SSF evolution process. The first configuration is to provide lunar transfer vehicle accommodation support, and the second is to provide accommodation support for the Mars transfer vehicle. (MTV)

Hueter, Uwe↗

NASA NTRS1982

Ground- versus spaced-based orbital transfer vehicle

A space based orbital transfer vehicle (SBOTV) and ground based OTV's (GBOTV) are compared for debris protection, space based OTV maintenance provisions, flight performance, onorbit refueling, and launch and return operations. Debris protection has a severe impact on the SBOTV, while the penalty for the GBOTV is much less severe. A key technology issue is the protection capability of composite materials. Onorbit maintenance is critical for SBOTV. Reduction of losses during the various transfers is th maine problem with refueling a SBOTV. Zero-g propellant storage and transfer is an important technology area for SBOTV. A reusable shroud must be developed to return GBOTV's if a Shuttle derivative vehicle is used. The advantage of space basing lies in more efficient use of the launch vehicle. Since most of the mass going to LEO is OTV propellant, and the launches to deliver the SBOTV propellant are generally mass limited, substantially fewer launches are required to support the SBOTV.

Rehder, J.↗

NASA NTRS1984

Performance assessment of aero-assisted orbital transfer vehicles

Aero-assisted orbital transfer vehicles are analyzed. The aerodynamic characteristics over the flight profile and three- and six-degree-of-freedom performance analyses were determined. The important results, to date, are: (1) the aerodynamic preliminary analysis system, an interactive computer program, used to predict the aerodynamics (performance, stability, and control) for these vehicles; (2) the performance capability, e.g., maximum inclination change, maximum heating rate, and maximum sensed acceleration, can be determined using continuum aerodynamics only; (3) guidance schemes can be developed that allow for errors in atmospheric density prediction, mispredicted trim angle of attack, and off-nominal atmospheric interface conditions, even for vehicles with a low lift-to-drag ratio; and (4) multiple pass trajectories can be used to reduce the maximum heating rate.

Powell, R. W.↗

NASA NTRS1979

Concept considerations for a small orbital transfer vehicle

This paper summarizes a study of small orbital transfer vehicles to place payloads in orbits with altitudes above those of the standard Shuttle operations. The overall objective of the study is to examine the role of the small orbital transfer vehicle (SOTV) in Shuttle operations and to identify typical propulsion concepts for accomplishing the mission. Consideration is given to existing and planned systems and upper stages, along with new propulsion stages. The new propulsion concept development examines tandem and clustered solids, controlled solids, monopropellant and bipropellant liquids, and staged solid/liquid combinations. The paper presents considerations of the mission requirements, tradeoffs of the various configurations, and candidate selections. For the selected candidate concepts the performance, support equipment, operational considerations and program costs were determined. The results show that a new modular liquid stage system is cost effective in handling the majority of the payloads considered. The remainder of the payloads can be accomodated by existing systems.

Green, M.↗

NASA NTRS1980

High performance cryogenic engines for orbit transfer vehicles

Evaluations of O2/H2 engine candidates in the 10K to 30K lb thrust class for Manned Orbit Transfer Vehicles (MOTV) and engine candidates using O2/H2, O2/RP-1, and O2/CH4 in the 100 to 3,000 lb thrust range for Cargo Orbit Transfer Vehicles (COTV) are discussed. Both space vehicles are part of the larger SPS concept. It is shown that the Advanced Expander Cycle O2/H2 engine for MOTV merits further study and investigations. COTV engine study has so far indicated that conventionally cooled O2/H2 and O2/CH4 engine candidates should be evaluated further, while advanced cooling schemes are required for O2/RP-1 concepts. With regard to MOTV, it is concluded that while no existing system meets the requirements of the Orbit Transfer Vehicles, the need for twin expander cycle engines is established because a single engine cannot provide a tolerable man-safety profile. With regard to COTV, it is stressed that advanced cooling concepts must be considered if other propellant combinations are to become competitive with O2/H2. Multistage centrifugal pumps are seen as the most promising concept.

Bassham, L. B.↗

NASA NTRS1988

Design of a fast crew transfer vehicle to Mars

A final report is made on the trajectory and vehicle requirements for a fast crew transfer vehicle to Mars which will complete an Earth to Mars (and Mars to Earth) transfer in 150 days and will have a stay time at Mars of 40 days. This vehicle will maximize the crew's effectiveness on Mars by minimizing detrimental physiological effects such as bone demineralization and loss of muscle tone caused by long period exposure to zero gravity and radiation from cosmic rays and solar flares. The crew transfer vehicle discussed will complete the second half of a Split Mission to Mars. In the Split Mission, a slow, unmanned cargo vehicle, nicknamed the Barge, is sent to Mars ahead of the crew vehicle. Once the Barge is in orbit around Mars, the fast crew vehicle will be launched to rendezvous with the Barge in Mars orbit. The vehicle presented is designed to carry six astronauts for a mission duration of one year. The vehicle uses a chemical propulsion system and a nuclear power system. Four crew modules, similar to the proposed Space Station Common Modules, are used to house the crew and support equipment during the mission. The final design also includes a command module that is shielded to protect the crew during radiation events.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1987

Aeroassisted manned transfer vehicle (TAXI) for advanced Mars Transportation: NASA/USRA 1987 Senior Design Project

A conceptual design study of an aeroassisted orbital transfer vehicle is discussed. Nicknamed TAXI, it will ferry personnel and cargo: (1) between low Earth orbit and a spacecraft circling around the Sun in permanent orbit intersecting gravitational fields of Earth and Mars, and (2) between the cycling spacecraft and a Mars orbiting station, co-orbiting with Phobos. Crew safety and mission flexibility (in terms of ability to provide a wide range of delta-V) were given high priority. Three versions were considered, using the same overall configuration based on a low L/D aerobrake with the geometry of a raked off elliptical cone with ellipsoidal nose and a toroidal skirt. The propulsion system consists of three gimballed LOX/LH2 engines firing away from the aerobrake. The versions differ mainly in the size of the aeroshields and propellant tanks. TAXI A version resulted from an initial effort to design a single transfer vehicle able to meet all delta-V requirements during the 15-year period (2025 to 2040) of Mars mission operations. TAXI B is designed to function with the cycling spacecraft moving in a simplified, nominal trajectory. On Mars missions, TAXI B would be able to meet the requirements of all the missions with a relative approach velocity near Mars of less than 9.3 km/sec. Finally, TAXI C is a revision of TAXI A, a transfer vehicle designed for missions with a relative velocity near Mars larger than 9.3 km/sec. All versions carry a crew of 9 (11 with modifications) and a cargo of 10000 lbm. Trip duration varies from 1 day for transfer from LEO to the cycling ship to nearly 5 days for transfer from the ship to the Phobos orbit.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1979

Preliminary design for a space based orbital transfer vehicle

A space-based orbital transfer vehicle has been sized for a 50-metric-ton payload delivery from low-earth-orbit to a geosynchronous orbit. Space basing effected substantial reductions in cryogenic insulation, tank, and body structure. The tank and body structural masses are shown to be lower for space basing because of the larger difference in acceleration loads between the on-orbit case (0.2 g's) and delivery (3.0 g's), the latter applying to ground-based vehicles which are delivered to orbit fully loaded with propellants. Insulation masses are lower because of the absence of an atmosphere and the attendant heat transfer losses. Insulation systems masses are also reduced because of the elimination of the problem of liquefaction and freezing of moisture on the tanks.

Macconochie, I. O.↗

NASA NTRS1983

Definition of technology development missions for early space station, orbit transfer vehicle servicing. Volume 1: Executive summary

Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) servicing study scope, propellant transfer, storage and reliquefaction technology development missions (TDM), docking and berthing TDM, maintenance TDM, OTV/payload integration TDM, combined TDMS design, summary space station accomodations, programmatic analysis, and TDM equipment operational usage are discussed.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1979

Small orbital transfer vehicle for shuttle operations

Small orbital transfer vehicles to place payloads in orbits with altitudes above those of the standard Shuttle operation are studied. Low energy earth orbits below those of the planned spinning solid upper stages are addressed. Tandem and clustered solids are considered along with controlled solids, monopropellant and bipropellant liquids, and staged solid/liquid combinations. The performance, airborne support equipment, and program costs for the selected candidate concepts are presented. The results show that the most economical way to deliver the low energy payloads is with a modular liquid bipropellant stage system for the large majority of the payloads. The remainder of the payloads would use the Shuttle with integral OMS and Scout from WTR for a few specialized payloads until the Shuttle is operational at WTR.

Sibila, A. I.↗

NASA NTRS1985

Space debris protection for a reusable orbital transfer vehicle

The protection of a reusable transfer vehicle from space debris is discussed. The results of a debris protection analysis are given. It was concluded that a shielding thickness of 0.62mm (24 mils) equivalent aluminum was needed when using a good double wall design. An additional 0.43 mm (18 mils) of shielding was needed during on-orbit storage time between flights.

Davis, E. E.↗

NASA NTRS1986

Orbital transfer vehicle launch operations study: Manpower summary and facility requirements, volume 5

All manpower numbers, number of heads (by skill), serial time and manhours have been accumulated and compiled on a per subtask basis in spreadsheet format for both the ground based and the space based data flows. To aid in identifying the facility resources required to process the Ground Based Orbital Transfer Vehicle (GBOTV) and/or the space based orbital transfer vehicle (SBOTV) through the ground facilities at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), a software application package was developed using a general purpose data base management system known as Data Flex. The facility requirements are used as the basic input to this software application. The resources of the KSC facility that could be used by orbital transfer vehicle program were digitized in the same format used to identify facility requirements. The facility capabilities were digitized in this format for subsequent, automated comparative analyses. Composite facility requirements are compared to each of the baseline facility capabilities and the system generates a relative score that indicates how each facility weighs against the composite requirements in relation to the other facilities in the set.

Source record↗