SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
The gamma-ray emitting radionuclide concentration and decontamination factor results from gamma-ray spectrometry measurements of ATR loop liquid samples by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) are contained in this report for ATR Cycle 175C from Nov. 05, 2025, to Jan. 23, 2026.
The gamma-ray emitting radionuclide concentration and decontamination factor results from gamma-ray spectrometry measurements of ATR loop liquid samples by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) are contained in this report for ATR Cycle 174-A from Feb.24, 2025 to Mar. 03, 2025.
The gamma-ray emitting radionuclide concentration and decontamination factor results from gamma-ray spectrometry measurements of ATR loop liquid samples by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) are contained in this report for ATR Cycle 175-A from Apr. 01, 2025, to Jul. 13,2025.
ATRC is a replica of the larger ATR design and is used to conduct research and obtain data such as flux measurements, excess reactivity, and loading requirements before being loaded into ATR. One method for determining the impact an experiment will have at ATR is by looking at the axial flux profile along the fuel rod in the corresponding ATRC experiment; however, flux wand measurements includes large amounts of variation which makes drawing conclusions from the data difficult. This poster describes a definitive method to propagate the uncertainty from ATRC measurements using Python code.
This is a powerpoint presentation for the annual Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation (ASI) program webinar. The following is a summary of the presentation. Advanced instrumentation enables testing of nuclear fuels and materials in support of the US advanced nuclear technology industry. A number of promising sensor technologies are in the pipeline. The early part of sensor development can be done outside of the reactor environment, but full technical readiness requires experience gained from in-core performance testing. Customers usually have only one shot to conduct their irradiation experiments. Because of the high costs test sponsors are frequently reluctant to incorporate unproven technologies in reactor experiments. Therefore, it is vital to demonstrate newly-developed sensors in operational conditions, prior to incorporating them into long-term high-value experiments. Successful completion of these activities will create new monitoring capabilities in high-power test reactors (such as ATR) as well as specialty reactors such as TREAT.
We report as a system level code, RELAP5 is widely used in the nuclear field for the reactor hydraulic analysis. In the component/experimental level, it is frequently employed as well. This paper demonstrates that the RELAP5 flow simulation of the AFIP-7 irradiation experiment which has a complicated 3D geometry/flow path deviates by ~28% from the flow evaluation through a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation, which has been validated against a flow test performed at Oregon State University. Thermal safety compliance analysis of an experiment planned to be irradiated in the Advanced Test Reactor is usually performed using the finite element analysis code, Abaqus. This research reveals the disadvantages of the Abaqus simulation in the flow instability and departure from nucleate boiling evaluations via a conjugate heat transfer analysis of the AFIP-7 irradiation experiment. As a result, a detailed CFD simulation is suggested for irradiation experiments with complicated flow paths, rather than a simplified RELAP5 simulation or hand calculations. The validated simulation approach will be integrated with the Boehmite correlations to investigate the oxide growth prediction on the fuel cladding in Part II of this research.
Irradiation experiments conducted in the Idaho National Laboratory’s Advanced Test Reactor are typically assumed to have little effect on one another. This assumption does not hold true for certain experiments in close proximity. To evaluate the impacts on safety and programmatic parameters of experiments in the center flux trap, the contents of the adjacent H and inner-A positions were modeled with a range of possible irradiation targets. First, neutron flux maps with experiments in those positions were compared against a baseline configuration. Next, several safety and programmatic parameters for a generic accident-tolerant fuel test train were calculated. It was shown that these parameters can exhibit considerable sensitivity to the contents of the H and A experiment positions.
I-Loop is an irradiation facility that is currently being installed at the Advanced Test Reactor. It is a two-loop test facility capable of performing Light Water Reactor (LWR) irradiations in prototypic coolant conditions. The two loops are being installed to be capable of both Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) and Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) pressure, temperature, and chemistry environments. Each loop is nominally dedicated as a BWR or PWR for simplicity of operations. In-reactor water loop testing that an I-Loop provides is key to the deployment of new accident tolerant fuel technologies and other advanced LWR fuel concepts. Currently, pressurized water loops are the only testing facilities available to test BWR fuel concepts. Their test environments are non-prototypic at higher pressure/temperature and at single-phase fluid flow conditions. This void in the LWR test bed capabilities is one that the I-Loop is uniquely situated to provide. This report discusses the mechanical design, thermal hydraulic calculations, and neutronic calculations of a proposed standard experiment of accident tolerant BWR fuel concepts. Mechanical design examines the geometry and features of the main components. Thermal hydraulic calculations examine the modeling and results of the two-phase flow options available. Lastly, neutronic calculations examine the Monte Carlo analysis of enrichment, heat rates, and flux spectrum.
The strategy for qualifying a FSP system could have a significant programmatic impact. The US has not qualified a space fission power system since launch of the SNAP-10A in 1965. This paper explores cost-effective options for obtaining data that would be needed for flight qualification of a fission system. Qualification data could be obtained from both nuclear and non-nuclear testing. The ability to perform highly realistic nonnuclear testing has advanced significantly throughout the past four decades. Instrumented thermal simulators were developed during the 1970s and 1980s to assist in the development, operation, and assessment of terrestrial fission systems. Instrumented thermal simulators optimized for assisting in the development, operation, and assessment of modern FSP systems have been under development (and utilized) since 1998. These thermal simulators enable heat from fission to be closely mimicked (axial power profile, radial power profile, temperature, heat flux, etc.) and extensive data to be taken from the core region. For transient testing, pin power during a transient is calculated based on the reactivity feedback that would occur given measured values of test article temperature and/or dimensional changes. The reactivity feedback coefficients needed for the test are either calculated or measured using cold/warm zero-power criticals. In this way non-nuclear testing can be used to provide very realistic information related to nuclear operation. Non-nuclear testing can be used at all levels, including component, subsystem, and integrated system testing. FSP fuels and materials are typically chosen to ensure very high confidence in operation at design burnups, fluences, and temperatures. However, facilities exist (e.g. ATR, HFIR) for affordably performing in-pile fuel and materials irradiations, if such testing is desired. Ex-core materials and components (such as alternator materials, control drum drives, etc.) could be irradiated in university or DOE reactors to ensure adequate radiation resistance. Facilities also exist for performing warm and cold zero-power criticals.
To optimize nuclear waste repository performance, the destruction of minor actinide elements, particularly Np and Am, in a neutron fast spectrum reactor is possible by incorporating these elements into nuclear fuel. Evaluating the performance of minor actinide containing fuel is of paramount importance to enabling this technology. However, such a task is challenging without an available domestic fast spectrum test reactor. A comparison of fuel performance tested in an available domestic thermal reactor at the Idaho National Laboratory, the Advanced Test Reactor, and in a fast spectrum reactor in France (Phénix) is presented here in this study. This study evaluates the capability of using a cadmium shrouded test position to mimic the power profile along the fuel radius present in fast spectrum reactors so that thermally driven phenomenon (e.g., constituent redistribution) can be evaluated in a thermal reactor and determined to be prototypical of a fast reactor. Thus, optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy has been performed on irradiated 35U-29Pu-4Am-2Np-30Zr fuel samples (where the number preceding the element is the weight percent concentration) from the two mentioned reactors that present similar irradiation temperatures and power conditions. The results indicate that fuel performance phenomena are reproducible in the two irradiation conditions. The redistribution of Zr occurred in the same manner for the two samples. Similar partitioning of U-Pu-Zr phases was observed, and the behavior of Am was similar in the analyzed specimens. Finally, the overall microstructure evolution seems not to be affected by minor actinides addition compared to expected behavior of conventional U-19Pu-10Zr ternary metal fuels for both specimens. Slight differences in fuel cladding chemical interaction were, however, observed. This difference is likely driven by difference in cladding composition rather than irradiation conditions.
The sixth Core Internals Changeout (CIC) of ATR was completed on March 21, 2022, and Nuclear Testing (NT) commenced shortly thereafter. In support of NT, 235U flux wires were attached to flux wands using electrical tape and installed in water channels 2, 6, 11, 15 and 19 in each of the 40 ATR Mark VII fuel elements that comprise an ATR core to perform low power flux measurements during ATR Cycle 170CIC NT-3. The flux wands were fabricated from Poly (Methyl Methacrylate), or PMMA. Irradiated cobalt capsules were loaded in the ATR Northeast Irradiation Housing Assembly (NEIHA), the East Flux Trap (EFT), South Flux Trap (SFT), inboard A-positions and various H-positions as a 170CIC NT-3 core reactivity hold-down mechanism. The PMMA flux wands received significant gamma dose from the irradiated cobalt during NT-3 which caused discoloration, embrittlement and swelling of the flux wands. The removal of the degraded flux wands from the 0.078 in. wide by 50 in. long fuel element coolant channels has been a unique challenge. This presentation summarizes the cleaning techniques used to remove the flux wand debris from the elements, an aggressive PMMA irradiation experiment performed concomitantly with initial cleaning efforts, and planned inspection and qualification techniques that will be applied in the future to potentially requalify the impacted elements for re-use.
This study explores data-driven anomaly detection methods to analyze sensor fail- ures in the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) nuclear fuel irradiation experiments. Specifically, we examine failures of thermocouples (TCs), which are critical for mon- itoring and controlling in-reactor temperatures during operation. Failures were pri- marily observed during abrupt power transitions and manifested as sensor drop-outs, drifts, or unexplained behavior. We applied three time-series analysis techniques— rolling mean smoothing, matrix profile, and vector auto-regression (VAR)—to de- tect anomalies in TC data prior to failure events. The rolling mean method effec- tively highlighted deviations aligned with reported failures, while the matrix profile provided partial early warning but sometimes flagged normal fluctuations during power-down periods. VAR shows potential in capturing multivariate dependencies but requires further calibration. A rare case of TC drift was also documented, which did not result in failure, underscoring the challenge of building predictive models with sparse positive examples. Our findings demonstrate that traditional statistical tools can aid anomaly detection but have limited predictive power without richer training data. We propose future directions including synthetic data generation, real- time surrogate modeling, and multi-modal feature integration. This work provides a foundation for applying robust anomaly detection frameworks to mission-critical sensor systems in experimental settings.