Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “points”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Facility Radionuclide Emission Points and Sampling Systems

Battelle–Pacific Northwest Division operates numerous research and development laboratories in Washington State. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) contracts to Battelle at Richland facilities on both the DOE Hanford Site and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)-Richland campus. These facilities have the potential for radionuclide air emissions. The PNNL contract with DOE also includes operations at the PNNL-Sequim campus in Sequim, where there is also the potential for radionuclide air emissions. This document is a periodic update that describes current PNNL facility emission units and sampling systems.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Facility Radionuclide Emission Points and Sampling Systems

Battelle–Pacific Northwest Division operates numerous research and development laboratories in Washington State. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) contracts to Battelle at Richland facilities on both the DOE Hanford Site and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Richland campus. These facilities have the potential for radionuclide air emissions. The PNNL contract with DOE also includes operations at the PNNL-Sequim campus in Sequim, where there is also the potential for radionuclide air emissions. This document is a periodic update that describes current PNNL facility emission units and sampling systems. The National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP [40 Code of Federal Regulations 61, Subpart H]) requires an assessment of all emission units that have the potential for radionuclide air emissions. Emission units are registered with the State of Washington. Potential emissions from emission units are assessed annually by PNNL staff. Sampling, monitoring, and other regulatory compliance requirements are designated based on the potential to-emit dose criteria, a graded approach to facility-identified potential impact categories, and regulatory requirements. The purpose of this document is to describe the facility radionuclide air emission sampling program and provide current and historical facility emission unit system performance, operation, and design information. For sampled emission units, the building, exhaust unit, control technologies, and sample extraction details are provided. Additionally, applicable configuration drawings, figures, and photographs are included. For non-sampled emission units, emission estimation and radionuclide source details are provided. Site-wide permits for the lowest potential impact category are described. Deregistered/transitioned emission unit details are also provided as necessary for at least 5 years post-closure/transition. Currently, five emission units are sampled continuously for particulate radionuclides at PNNL managed facilities on the PNNL-Richland campus (3 of the 5) and on the Hanford Site (2 of the 5). Four of these units have sampling systems that comply with the American National Standards Institute/Health Physics Society (ANSI/HPS) N13.1–2011 standard for sampling from stacks and ducts of nuclear facilities, and the fifth is grandfathered and compliant with the older ANSI N13.1–1969 standard. In addition, the PNNL-managed Hanford Site 325 Building EP 325-01-S stack is sampled continuously for emissions of tritium. No emissions sampling is required for the single licensed emission unit on the PNNL-Sequim campus.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Tritium Trapping Thermodynamics by Point Defects at Interfacial Fe-Al Phases of the Aluminide Coating

Density functional theory (DFT) simulations have been carried out to evaluate the potential for tritium trapping by metal vacancies in four phases (i.e., (Fe, Cr, Ni), AlFe 3 , NiAl, and AlFe) identified near the interface between the Al coating and 316 stainless steel (316 SS) cladding. In addition, an ab initio thermodynamics approach has been employed to predict the temperature and T 2 -partial pressure dependence on the thermodynamics of tritiated defects. Key results in this work suggest that metal vacancies in the four phases have the potential to favorably trap tritium species. This thermodynamic trend can be correlated to the high energy cost of having an interstitial tritium in the lattice, which has been calculated to be at least 0.48 eV. By combining the results of this study with previous theoretical works investigating tritium behavior in other Fe-Al phases identified in the aluminide coating, suggest that metal vacancies are generally able to trap tritium in various Fe-Al aluminide phases. Especially, it was found that Al vacancies are the most efficient to trap tritium, followed by Fe vacancies, then Ni and Cr vacancies. Strong interactions between tritium and the metal vacancies are occurring by the formation of Fe—T bonds. The formation of Cr—T, Ni—T, or Al—T bonds are found less energetically favorable than Fe—T bonds.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Thermodynamics of Tritium Trapping by Point Defects in Intermetallic Al 12 (TM) 2.35 Aluminide Coating Phase

Density functional theory simulations have been carried out to investigate the potential for tritium trapping by metal vacancies in intermetallic Al 12 (TM) 2.35 phase (TM = Fe, Cr, and Ni) as function of temperature and tritium partial pressure. It was found that tritium could be favorably trapped by Fe and Ni vacancies and not favorably trapped by Al and Cr vacancies. However, due to the presence of partially occupied Al sites in bulk Al 12 (TM) 2.35 , leading to the approximate number of ~255 Al atoms in the unit cell, 86 sites were found energetically favorable to the creation of an Al vacancy. While adding a tritium atom in an Al vacancy is not energetically favorable, the tritiated defect still has a negative Gibbs free energy because the energy gain for creating an Al vacancy overcome the energy cost of adding the tritium species. Based on the calculated Gibbs free energy, the first tritiation of a metal vacancy, at conditions relevant to in-reactor operations, should be more favorable for Al, followed Fe, Ni, and Cr vacancies. By comparing the behavior of tritium in Al 12 (TM) 2.35 with previously studied Fe-Al coating phases (i.e., FeNiAl 5 , Fe 4 Al 13 , and Fe 2 Al 5.6 ), we found that there is a correlation between interstitial tritium solubility and the potential for vacancy trapping. The current trend suggests that if the insertion of an interstitial tritium cost more than 0.3 eV, then trapping by metal vacancies should be preferred. By combining the simulations results obtained to date, we noticed different trapping mechanisms of tritium in the Al coating. Tritium is mostly trapped by Fe and Ni vacancies in the outer Fe-Al coating phase Al 12 (TM) 2.35 while tritium should be preferentially trapped by Al and Fe vacancies for the inner Fe-Al coating phases (FeNiAl 5 , Fe 4 Al 13 , Fe 2 Al 5.6 ). Altogether, these studies show that tritium interacts differently with the various Fe-Al aluminide phases, they also suggest that tritium trapping and retention could be more efficient if metal defects are present and if the solubility of interstitial tritium in the different phases is low.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Overview of On-Line Optical Measurements at High Pressure for Flue Gases, Particulates and Acid-dew Point of Pressurized Oxy-Combustion

Optical flow cells are critical measurement interfaces, yet sampling under harsh conditions — high pressure, high temperature, particles, moisture, or corrosive gases — makes it difficult to maintain optical quality without perturbing the measurement. To address this challenge, a new flow cell was developed using a laminar coaxial flow field that separates the purge and sample flows. A dedicated test system was built to evaluate particle size distribution (PSD) measurements using a Malvern Panalytical Insitec analyzer. Results demonstrated that the sample flow alone defines the measurement zone, while the purge flow effectively shields the optical windows from deposition, eliminating sampling bias. The flow cell enables reliable PSD measurement under high pressure and temperature in moist, corrosive environments. As a key demonstration, the instrument was successfully deployed for on-line PSD measurement of flue gas from a 100 kWth pressurized oxy-coal combustor at 15 bara.

Cheng, Mao↗