Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “VERIFICATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1985

Dynamic verification of very large space structures

A research program in spacecraft structures, structural dynamics, and controls verification using a relatively large, flexible beam as a focus is introduced. This research effort addresses fundamental problems applicable to the verification of large, flexible space structures and combines ground tests, flight behavior prediction, and instrumented orbital tests. The program is expected to produce quantitative results for use in improving the validity of ground tests for verifying flight performance analyses.

Hanks, B. R.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Future requirements of wind tunnels for Computational Fluid Dynamics code verification

The role of experiment in the development of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for external aerodynamic flow-field prediction is discussed. Requirements for code verification from two sources pacing the development of CFD are described: (1) the need for developing adequate flow modeling, and (2) the need for establishing confidence in the use of CFD for predicting complex flows. The type of data needed to meet these needs differs in detail and scope and leads to definite wind tunnel requirements. Recent examples of testing to assess and develop turbulence models, and to verify code development are used to establish future requirements of wind tunnel testing for CFD verification.

Marvin, J. G.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Single-Event Upset (SEU) model verification and threshold determination using heavy ions in a bipolar static RAM

Single-Event Upset (SEU) response of a bipolar low-power Schottky-diode-clamped TTL static RAM has been observed using Br ions in the 100-240 MeV energy range and O ions in the 20-100 MeV range. These data complete the experimental verification of circuit-simulation SEU modeling for this device. The threshold for onset of SEU has been observed by the variation of energy, ion species and angle of incidence. The results obtained from the computer circuit-simulation modeling and experimental model verification demonstrate a viable methodology for modeling SEU in bipolar integrated circuits.

Zoutendyk, J. A.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Dynamic verification of very large space structures

The dynamic verification of spacecraft relies heavily on ground-based tests. These tests usually simulate flight environments or validate analytical models used in establishing design loads and in designing control algorithms. They also provide security against failures resulting from unanticipated or unmodeled hardware behavior. Future orbital antennas, space stations, and solar power systems are likely to be of sizes difficult to test using current ground test technology. In addition to size, other factors such as low natural frequencies, lightweight construction, and the presence of many structural joints, cause significant sensitivity of the test process to the earth-gravity environment. Yet, accuracy requirements on the verification process will be more stringent because of modern flexible-structure control approaches. This paper describes some of the problems and discusses research on potential solutions. The importance of an integrated ground test, analysis, and flight test program is emphasized. An ongoing research program of this type focusing on a 60-meter, deployable, truss-beam test article is described.

Hanks, B. R.↗
NASA NTRS1987

TSS subsatellite attitude dynamics and control laws verification programs

A dynamic model of the Tethered Satellite System (TSS) and of the relevant simulation program, developed in order to provide the dynamic analysis support for the design verification of the subsatellite attitude control, is presented. Special care was spent in the satellite attitude dynamic analysis and the model was specifically conceived to this aim. The way in which the simulation results can be utilized for the verification and testing of the attitude control is also presented.

Venditti, Floriano↗
NASA NTRS1987

Probabilistic structural analysis verification studies

The basic objective of this verification effort is to apply probabilistic structural analysis methods developed and implemented in the Numerical Evaluation of Stochastic Structures Under Stress (NESSUS) code to typical space propulsion components. The chosen typical components are turbine blade, high pressure duct, Lox post, and transfer tube liners. Since analysis options of increasing levels of sophistication are implemented in NESSUS incrementally, the verification efforts are also tailored to have increasing levels of sophistication during the progression of the contract. The current released version of the code is limited to linear structural analysis.

Rajagopal, K. R.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Wind tunnel requirements for computational fluid dynamics code verification

The role of experiment in the development of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for aerodynamic flow field prediction is discussed. Requirements for code verification from two sources that pace the development of CFD are described for: (1) development of adequate flow modeling, and (2) establishment of confidence in the use of CFD to predict complex flows. The types of data needed and their accuracy differs in detail and scope and leads to definite wind tunnel requirements. Examples of testing to assess and develop turbulence models, and to verify code development, are used to establish future wind tunnel testing requirements. Versatility, appropriate scale and speed range, accessibility for nonintrusive instrumentation, computerized data systems, and dedicated use for verification were among the more important requirements identified.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1986

A specification-based approach to concurrent structure verification in multiprocessor systems

A recently initiated research project concerned with the concurrent detection of software errors and errors due to physical failures in the hardware of multiprocessor systems is described in this paper. An approach to error detection is described, which is specification based and relies on the structural verification of program control flow and data structure integrity. The techniques discussed utilize the hardware redundancy inherent in parallel processing systems to provide verification of both program structure and data concurrently with program execution.

Fuchs, W. Kent↗
NASA NTRS1987

Approaches to the verification of rule-based expert systems

Expert systems are a highly useful spinoff of artificial intelligence research. One major stumbling block to extended use of expert systems is the lack of well-defined verification and validation (V and V) methodologies. Since expert systems are computer programs, the definitions of verification and validation from conventional software are applicable. The primary difficulty with expert systems is the use of development methodologies which do not support effective V and V. If proper techniques are used to document requirements, V and V of rule-based expert systems is possible, and may be easier than with conventional code. For NASA applications, the flight technique panels used in previous programs should provide an excellent way to verify the rules used in expert systems. There are, however, some inherent differences in expert systems that will affect V and V considerations.

Culbert, Chris↗
NASA NTRS1988

A software engineering approach to expert system design and verification

Software engineering design and verification methods for developing expert systems are not yet well defined. Integration of expert system technology into software production environments will require effective software engineering methodologies to support the entire life cycle of expert systems. The software engineering methods used to design and verify an expert system, RENEX, is discussed. RENEX demonstrates autonomous rendezvous and proximity operations, including replanning trajectory events and subsystem fault detection, onboard a space vehicle during flight. The RENEX designers utilized a number of software engineering methodologies to deal with the complex problems inherent in this system. An overview is presented of the methods utilized. Details of the verification process receive special emphasis. The benefits and weaknesses of the methods for supporting the development life cycle of expert systems are evaluated, and recommendations are made based on the overall experiences with the methods.

Bochsler, Daniel C.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Constrained structural dynamic model verification using free vehicle suspension testing methods

Verification of the validity of a spacecraft's structural dynamic math model used in computing ascent (or in the case of the STS, ascent and landing) loads is mandatory. This verification process requires that tests be carried out on both the payload and the math model such that the ensuing correlation may validate the flight loads calculations. To properly achieve this goal, the tests should be performed with the payload in the launch constraint (i.e., held fixed at only the payload-booster interface DOFs). The practical achievement of this set of boundary conditions is quite difficult, especially with larger payloads, such as the 12-ton Hubble Space Telescope. The development of equations in the paper will show that by exciting the payload at its booster interface while it is suspended in the 'free-free' state, a set of transfer functions can be produced that will have minima that are directly related to the fundamental modes of the payload when it is constrained in its launch configuration.

Blair, Mark A.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Ada(R) Test and Verification System (ATVS)

The Ada Test and Verification System (ATVS) functional description and high level design are completed and summarized. The ATVS will provide a comprehensive set of test and verification capabilities specifically addressing the features of the Ada language, support for embedded system development, distributed environments, and advanced user interface capabilities. Its design emphasis was on effective software development environment integration and flexibility to ensure its long-term use in the Ada software development community.

Strelich, Tom↗
NASA NTRS1988

Wind tunnel requirements for computational fluid dynamics code verification

The role of experiment in the development of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for aerodynamic flow field prediction is discussed. Requirements for code verification from two sources that pace the development of CFD are described for: (1) development of adequate flow modeling, and (2) establishment of confidence in the use of CFD to predict complex flows. The types of data needed and their accuracy differs in detail and scope and leads to definite wind tunnel requirements. Examples of testing to assess and develop turbulence models, and to verify code development, are used to establish future wind tunnel testing requirements. Versatility, appropriate scale and speed range, accessibility for nonintrusive instrumentation, computerized data systems, and dedicated use for verification were among the more important requirements identified.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Alignment verification procedures

In alignment verification procedures each laboratory is required to align its test machines and gripping fixtures to produce a nearly uniform tensile stress field on an un-notched sheet specimen. The blank specimens (50 mm w X 305 mm l X 2.3 mm th) supplied by the coordinators were strain gauged. Strain gauge readings were taken at all gauges (n = 1 through 10). The alignment verification procedures are as follows: (1) zero all strain gauges while specimen is in a free-supported condition; (2) put strain-gauged specimen in the test machine so that specimen front face (face 1) is in contact with reference jaw (standard position of specimen), tighten grips, and at zero load measure strains on all gauges. (epsilon sub nS0 is strain at gauge n, standard position, zero load); (3) with specimen in machine and at a tensile load of 10 kN measure strains (specimen in standard position). (Strain = epsilon sub nS10); (4) remove specimen from machine. Put specimen in machine so that specimen back face (face 2) is in contact with reference jaw (reverse position of specimen), tighten grips, and at zero load measure strains on all gauges. (Strain - epsilon sub nR0); and (5) with specimen in machine and at tensile load of 10 kN measure strains (specimen in reverse position). (epsilon sub nR10 is strain at gauge n, reverse position, 10 kN load).

Edwards, P. R.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Formal verification of a fault tolerant clock synchronization algorithm

A formal specification and mechanically assisted verification of the interactive convergence clock synchronization algorithm of Lamport and Melliar-Smith is described. Several technical flaws in the analysis given by Lamport and Melliar-Smith were discovered, even though their presentation is unusally precise and detailed. It seems that these flaws were not detected by informal peer scrutiny. The flaws are discussed and a revised presentation of the analysis is given that not only corrects the flaws but is also more precise and easier to follow. Some of the corrections to the flaws require slight modifications to the original assumptions underlying the algorithm and to the constraints on its parameters, and thus change the external specifications of the algorithm. The formal analysis of the interactive convergence clock synchronization algorithm was performed using the Enhanced Hierarchical Development Methodology (EHDM) formal specification and verification environment. This application of EHDM provides a demonstration of some of the capabilities of the system.

Rushby, John↗
NASA NTRS1989

Use of metaknowledge in the verification of knowledge-based systems

Knowledge-based systems are modeled as deductive systems. The model indicates that the two primary areas of concern in verification are demonstrating consistency and completeness. A system is inconsistent if it asserts something that is not true of the modeled domain. A system is incomplete if it lacks deductive capability. Two forms of consistency are discussed along with appropriate verification methods. Three forms of incompleteness are discussed. The use of metaknowledge, knowledge about knowledge, is explored in connection to each form of incompleteness.

Morell, Larry J.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Identification and verification of termination conditions in fine motion in presence of sensor errors and geometric uncertainties

Results are reported from a search for reasonable constraints under which an automatic uncertainty-handling strategy (for robot part-mating tasks) is guaranteed to succeed. The concept of contact formations is introduced to describe contacts among parts in a system, aiming at reducing the dimensionality of assembly verification. Also described is a technique for identifying contact formations in spite of errors in sensing and geometric uncertainties. It is impossible to verify termination conditions in general. Design constraints for which verification can be guaranteed are formulated and shown to be reasonable in the sense that they do not impose unrealistic conditions on typical designs. Results of implementation on a robot system consisting of a PUMA robot with RTI force/torque sensors support the theoretical derivations and show empirically that good results can still be obtained when the theoretical constraints are relaxed somewhat.

Desai, Rajiv S.↗
NASA NTRS1989

A verification library for multibody simulation software

A multibody dynamics verification library, that maintains and manages test and validation data is proposed, based on RRC Robot arm and CASE backhoe validation and a comparitive study of DADS, DISCOS, and CONTOPS that are existing public domain and commercial multibody dynamic simulation programs. Using simple representative problems, simulation results from each program are cross checked, and the validation results are presented. Functionalities of the verification library are defined, in order to automate validation procedure.

Kim, Sung-Soo↗