Computational simulations of [email protected] and [email protected] [email protected] nanotubes
Highlights: • [email protected] nanotubes are easily formed than [email protected] nanotubes. • Armchair [email protected] nanotubes present type-II behavior, while zigzag [email protected] nanotubes present type-I behavior. • The [email protected] had the piezoelectricity response improved until 10% of elongation. - Abstract: The structural, electronic, and mechanical properties of armchair and zigzag chiralities double-walled and [email protected] [email protected] and [email protected] nanotubes were investigated by periodic DFT/B3LYP calculations with an all-electron basis set. For both chiralities, [email protected] presents minor strain and deposition energies, which predict that this nanotube can be easier formed and the GaN is the most favorable substrate (the core) than ZnO. On the other hand, the zigzag [email protected] did not exhibit the major piezoelectric response, which is three times smaller than the [email protected] nanotube, showing that the compression of the [email protected] nanotube length is not favorable to this property. However, the piezoelectricity can be improved when the zigzag [email protected] is under elongation. The elastic constants showed that the [email protected] nanotubes are more rigid than the homogenous nanotubes and present higher piezoelectric constants. In addition, the projected DOS shows that [email protected] has a type-II interface and [email protected] has a type-I interface. Based on the results obtained from our theoretical models, the nanotubes have great potential for the experimental development of new electronic devices.