Results for “CLOSURES” — Page 28

DOE OSTI2017

Laser confocal microscope for analysis of 3013 inner container closure weld region

As part of the protocol to investigate the corrosion in the inner container closure weld region (ICCWR) a laser confocal microscope (LCM) was used to perform close visual examination of the surface and measurements of corrosion features on the surface. However, initial analysis of selected destructively evaluated (DE) containers using the LCM revealed several challenges for acquiring, processing and interpreting the data. These challenges include topography of the ICCWR sample, surface features, and the amount of surface area for collecting data at high magnification conditions. In FY17, the LCM parameters were investigated to identify the appropriate parameter values for data acquisition and identification of regions of interest. Using these parameter values, selected DE containers were analyzed to determine the extent of the ICCWR to be examined.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2018

Defense Waste Processing Facility Canister Closure Weld Current Validation Testing

Two closure welds on filled Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) canisters failed to be within the acceptance criteria in the DWPF operating procedure SW4-15.80-2.3 (1). In one case, the weld heat setting was inadvertently provided to the canister at the value used for test welds (i.e., 72%) and this oversight produced a weld at a current of nominally 210 kA compared to the operating procedure range (i.e., 82%) of 240 kA to 263 kA. The second weld appeared to experience an instrumentation and data acquisition upset. The current for this weld was reported as 191 kA. Review of the data from the Data Acquisition System (DAS) indicated that three of the four current legs were reading the expected values, approximately 62 kA each, and the fourth leg read zero current. Since there is no feasible way by further examination of the process data to ascertain if this weld was actually welded at either the target current or the lower current, a test plan was executed to provide assurance that these Nonconforming Welds (NCWs) meet the requirements for strength and leak tightness. Acceptance of the welds is based on evaluation of Test Nozzle Welds (TNW) made specifically for comparison. The TNW were nondestructively and destructively evaluated for plug height, heat tint, ultrasonic testing (UT) for bond length and ultrasonic volumetric examination for weld defects, burst pressure, fractography, and metallography. The testing was conducted in agreement with a Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP) (2) and applicable procedures.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Status of the Full Circumference Examination of the Inner Container Closure Weld Region for Selected 3013 DE Container

One of the main focus areas of the 3013 Surveillance Program is a thorough evaluation of the inner container closure weld region (ICCWR) opened for destructive examination (DE). As part of the protocol to investigate the corrosion in the ICCWR a laser confocal microscope (LCM) is used to perform close visual examination of the surface and measurements of corrosion features on the surface. In FY17, DE containers from FY13 through FY16 were evaluated to select candidates for a full circumference analysis of the ICCWR. In FY18, the selected DE containers for full circumference evaluation (FCE) were processed according to the ICCWR protocol. However, due to the time intensive task for collecting high magnification images for a full circumference, only FY15 DE07 was selected for completion of LCM data collection in FY18 with the remaining DE containers scheduled to be completed in FY19.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Pretreatment of Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST) and development of a digestion standard to support Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR)

In support of Savannah River Remediation’s (SRR) deployment of an ion exchange process to remove radioactive cesium from waste supernate, referred to as the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process, SRNL was tasked with validating the field protocol for pretreating the crystalline silicotitanate (CST) material to be used in the columns, preparing CST for use in in-tank batch contact testing, as well as developing a digestion standard to verify complete dissolution of the CST prior to characterization after each in-tank batch contact test. A procedure (SRNL L29 Manual, ITS-0229) was developed to document the protocol for pretreating CST utilizing conditions similar to what will be performed in the field. Analysis of material pretreated following the procedure confirmed similar conversion to the Na+ form of the resin as had been obtained previously. Portions of the batch of material pretreated according to the developed protocol were also used for development of a digestion standard. Results from digestion and analysis of this standard were used to establish a set of control limits for the measured Ti, Zr, and Nb concentrations in digested CST material. An aliquot of this standard CST material will be digested and analyzed alongside each in-tank batch contact sample, and the measured concentrations of Ti, Zr, and Nb will be compared against the established control limits to confirm complete digestion has occurred.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Tank Closure Cesium Removal Project CST Simulant Cesium Batch Contact Kinetics Test Results and Column Performance Predictions

To evaluate the cesium removal capabilities of the caustic-washed R9120-B version of crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media from Savannah River Site (SRS) waste during Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) column processing, batch contact kinetics tests were performed at 23 °C in SRS Average simulant. Cesium loading kinetics data was also collected (in current and previous testing; King, et al., 2018a) using the same simulant for an older CST sample (IE- 911) which was caustic-washed by the vendor many years ago and was recently retrieved from drums stored at SRS. (Note that R9120-B and IE-911 are believed to be identical materials, after the R9120-B was caustic washed by SRNL, and differ only by particle size and manufacturing date, and thus can be considered different batches). Although cesium loading kinetics testing can be conducted more rigorously using dynamic column tests, the batch contact method requires less simulant and considerably less experimental effort. Average percent removal data for batch contact samples for the two CST batches are provided in Table ES-1. Faster cesium uptake was observed with IE-911, although the loading rates for the two media batches were similar. After 5.5 hours of CST contact, 81% cesium removal was observed with R9120-B versus 86% removal with IE-911. Although these differences are small, the trend is consistent across the timed results, with the larger bead material always loading slower. These seemingly small differences in percent removal are believed to have a large impact on the column performance. Cesium loading curves for the two CST batches are provided in Figure ES-1 below. Faster cesium loading with IE-911 CST is presumed to be associated with the smaller average particle diameter (408 μm mean volume diameter) versus R9120-B (572 μm diameter). Cesium loading kinetic data was needed to conduct column performance comparisons (i.e., model predictions) for the two CST batches.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

FY19 Status of the Full Circumference Examination of the Inner Container Closure Weld Region for Selected 3013 DE Containers

One of the main focus areas of the 3013 Surveillance Program is a thorough evaluation of the inner container closure weld region (ICCWR) opened for destructive examination (DE). As part of the protocol to investigate the corrosion in the ICCWR a laser confocal microscope (LCM) is used to perform close visual examination of the surface and measurements of corrosion features on the surface. In FY17, DE containers from FY13 through FY16 were evaluated to select candidates for a full circumference analysis of the ICCWR. In FY18, the selected DE containers for full circumference evaluation (FCE) were processed according to the ICCWR protocol and LCM data collection was completed for the full circumference only for FY15 DE07. In FY19 the remaining DE containers were completed. The ICCWR protocol was completed as follows: (1) the FCE containers were sectioned into quarters and the weld removed to access the ICCWR; (2) a series of images of the ICCWR full circumference were taken using a stereo microscope and assembled into panoramic views; (3) SEM/EDS analysis performed on selected sections showed what is most likely corrosion products on the surface and chlorides randomly dispersed; (4) the presence of chlorides was also confirmed with ion chromatography of citric acid washes, in which FY15 DE07 and FY16 DE05 showed a significant amount of chlorides with FY15 DE08 showing the less amount of chlorides; (5) dye penetrant examination was performed on the interior and exterior surfaces of all the sidewall sections but reveled no relevant indication of surface-breaking defects, (6) finally, as described above, the full circumference examination of the ICCWR by LCM was completed. The three ICCWRs show general and localized corrosion on the surface. However, FY15 DE08 show more areas with agglomerated pits in Zones 2 and 3 than the other two DEs. The major suspect corrosion events were observed for FY15 DE07 on Sections C1 and C2 and for FY15 DE08 on Section C2. These events correspond to suspect cracks or crack-like features identified with a unique name to easily refer to each feature. FY15 DE07 shows a crack-like feature, identified as Acrux, in Section C1 and three features in Section C2 identified as Bellatrix, Cursa Minor and Cursa Major. Acrux and Bellatrix are located at the boundary of Zone 2 and Zone 3. Cursa Minor and Cursa Major are in Zone 2. FY15 DE08 shows two crack-like features, identified as Denebola and Draco, in Section C2. Both features are located at the boundary of Zone 2 and Zone 3. However, gas analysis and statistical evaluation of the gas compositions and pressures via GEST analyses suggest that leakage between the OI and IC volumes was unlikely. Additional characterization and analysis will be performed on the locations where the cracks were found.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

A Monte Carlo Rectangle Packing Algorithm for Identifying Likely Spatial Distributions of Final Closure Cap Subsidence in the E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility

A Monte Carlo rectangle packing algorithm, summarized in Figure ES-1, has been developed to provide insights into the likely spatial distribution of subsided areas or holes in the final closure cap for the E-Area Low-Level Waste Facility (ELLWF) resulting from the placement of non-crushable waste containers within slit and engineered trench disposal units. Using historical records provided by Solid Waste Management as an indicator of future waste streams, a probability distribution of unique waste containers was constructed, and Monte Carlo sampling was used to sequentially select waste containers for placement in a rectangular region bounded by the disposal unit footprint. Within this Monte Carlo approach, the probability of any container type being selected is weighted by the fractional abundance relative to all other container types. For each Monte Carlo realization, the frequency of non-crushable waste containers appearing at each location on a spatially discretized mesh is updated. After many realizations, the location(s) with the highest frequencies of non-crushable waste containers are regarded as the most likely locations to experience subsidence (i.e., for a hole to form). Utilizing this approach has enabled the down-selection of a computationally intractable set of subsidence hole combinations to be explored in three-dimensional finite element groundwater flow and contaminant transport models. Such an approach can be applied to a number of different packaging problems.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Tank 9H Salt Solution Supernatant Characterization in Support of Potential Operating Strategies of Tank 9H Supernatant Through the Tank Closure Cesium Removal System

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) recently initiated an ion exchange process to remove radioactive cesium from dissolved salt solution in Tank 10H, known as Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR). As part of that ongoing campaign, the salt in Tank 9H will be dissolved and transferred to Tank 10H for processing through the TCCR system, and SRR requested the characterization of the dissolved salt solution in Tank 9H prior to the transfer to Tank 10H. On July 18, 2019, Savannah River Remediation Engineering (SRR-E) delivered two variable depth Tank 9H salt solution samples, identified as samples HTF-9-19-74 and HTF-9-19-75 (combined total sample volume of about 400 mL) to the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) for characterization. These two Tank 9H variable depth samples (HTF-9-19-74 and HTF-9-19-75 taken at ~180” and 42”, respectively) were retrieved from Riser 7 after hydro-lancing activities were complete. Approximately 4200 gallons of water were added to the tank during this activity. This report presents the analytical characterization results for the Tank 9H salt solution variable depth samples HTF-9-19-74 and HTF-9-19-75 and contains mainly the filtrate analytical results for anions, elements, mass spectral data, total cesium characterization results and select radionuclide results, along with the X-ray diffraction characterization of the solid fractions from the liquid /solid separation of the variable depth salt solutions. Most of these analyses were performed in duplicate with the percent relative standard deviation (%RSD), a measure of the variability between each duplicate data set expressed as a percentage, used to estimate the analytical result quality for each analyte.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Summary of Expedited Results from Samples Supporting Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) Batch 3

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. As part of that process, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) receives and analyzes samples in support of the qualification of each batch to be processed. SRNL recently received supernate samples retrieved from Tank 10H as well as in-tank batch contact samples for characterization in support of qualifying Batch 3 for processing through the TCCR unit. SRNL received and characterized a set of dip samples collected from Tank 10H (one surface and one variable depth sample). No solids were observed in either sample and therefore the samples were combined, and a suite of analyses were performed on the composite sample. The density of the combined sample was 1.174 g/mL (0.18 %RSD), which was consistent with the measured sodium concentration of 3.54 M (0.08 %RSD). The 137Cs activity in the sample was 4.75E+07 dpm/mL (4.28 %RSD) and the total Cs concentration was calculated to be 1.54 mg/L (1.16E-05 M). The in-tank batch contact samples consist of 0.1 g of crystalline silicotitanate (CST) contained within a teabag device. Duplicate samples were submerged in Tank 10H supernate for a period of about 13 days, after which time they were retrieved and transferred to SRNL for analysis. At SRNL the CST was rinsed to remove excess salt solution and the CST was then air dried before being digested for analysis. Results of the analysis indicated a 137 Cs loading of 3.66E+10 ± 1.40E+09 dpm/g or 16.5 ± 0.63 Ci/kg CST . This value represents a bounding upper limit as it includes the addition of two sigma uncertainty from replicate analysis of the individual teabag samples as well as the addition of the small amount of 137 Cs activity measured in the rinse solutions. The above values are based on the air-dried mass of CST. Correcting to the true dry mass using a F-factor of 0.8191 results in a maximum loading of 20.2 ± 0.77 Ci/kg CST .

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Summary of Analytical Results from Samples Supporting Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) Batch 3 and Modeling Results for Cs Loading on CST

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. As part of that process, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) receives and analyzes samples in support of the qualification of each batch to be processed. SRNL recently received supernate samples retrieved from Tank 10H as well as in-tank batch contact samples for characterization in support of qualifying Batch 3 for processing through the TCCR unit. Some results from analysis of those samples have been previously reported. This report documents the remaining analyses of the in-tank batch contact samples as well as the results of ZAM (Zheng, Anthony, Miller) isotherm modeling performed for comparison to the measured results. Results of the additional analyses include analysis of the loading of other radionuclides besides 137 Cs on the crystalline silicotitanate (CST) contained within the in-tank batch contact test samples. Results from those analyses revealed the next highest contributor to the activity on the CST was 90 Sr with an average loading of 2.76E+08 dpm/g CST compared to 3.56E+10 dpm/g CST for the 137Cs. Isotopes of plutonium were also detected on the samples. ZAM modeling was performed using the measured composition of the Tank 10H Batch 3 qualification samples. The modeling predicted a maximum Cs loading approximately 2.2x higher than the measured result. This is a slightly lower ratio (expected/measured) compared to what was observed for the prior TCCR in-tank batch contact testing performed for Batches 1A and 2 where the ZAM results were 2.7-2.8x higher than the measured values.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

ZAM Modeling Study to Support the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A Unit

Currently at the Savannah River Site (SRS), the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) is an “at-tank” process designed to remove cesium from aqueous tank waste. Cesium will be removed by ion exchange using the engineered IONSIV® R9120 form of Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST) media. The current TCCR design has two columns online in a lead-lag configuration to optimize media usage and achieve the target decontamination. Once the lead column is saturated with cesium, it will be removed from service, the lag column will rotate into the lead position, and a new column with fresh ion-exchange media will be placed into the lag position. The TCCR process for cesium removal from Tank 10H is detailed in X-SOW-H- 00002. Demonstration of the system began in early calendar year 2019 with two batches of salt solution generated by dissolving saltcake in Tank 10H, followed by processing of these batches through the TCCR system. A third TCCR Tank 10H dissolved saltcake batch is scheduled for processing soon. Upon completion of the demonstration with Tank 10H dissolved saltcake, Tank 9H salt solution will be transferred to Tank 10H and subsequently processed through the TCCR unit with new CST media (referred to as R9120-B 30x60) added to new IX columns. The TCCR processing campaign of Tank 9H salt solution is referred to as TCCR-1A .

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Status of the Characterization of DEs from the Full Circumference Examination of the Inner Container Closure Weld Region (FY2020)

One of the main focus areas of the 3013 Surveillance Program is a thorough evaluation of the inner container closure weld region (ICCWR) opened for destructive examination (DE). As part of the protocol to investigate the corrosion in the ICCWR a laser confocal microscope (LCM) is used to perform close visual examination of the surface and measurements of corrosion features on the surface. DE containers from FY13 through FY16 were screened with three candidates selected for full circumference evaluation (FCE) according to the ICCWR examination protocol, During the FCE, FY16 DE05 and FY15 DE07 showed suspect major corrosion events, FY16 DE05 Section C2 shows two crack-like features, identified as Denebola and Draco. Both features are located at the boundary of Zone 2 and Zone 3. Consequently, Section C2 of FY16 DE05 was selected for examination by serial metallography at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). For FY15 DE07 the suspect corrosion events were observed on Sections Cl and C2. Section Cl shows one crack-like feature, identified as Acrux. Section C2 shows three crack-like features, identified as Bellatrix, Cursa Minor and Cursa Major. Unlike Acrux and Bellatrix, which are located at the boundary of Zone 2 and Zone 3, Cursa Minor and Cursa Major are located in Zone 2. Sections Cl and C2 of FY15 DE07 were sent to Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANE) for characterization by X-Ray Tomography (XRT).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Wide Area 3D Measurement System for Analysis of 3013 Inner Container Closure Weld Region

One of the main focus areas of the 3013 Surveillance Program is a thorough evaluation of the inner container closure weld region (ICCWR) opened for destructive examination (DE). As part of the protocol to investigate the corrosion in the ICCWR, a laser confocal microscope (LCM) is used to perform close visual examination of the surface and to measure corrosion features on the surface. However, in FY20, the introduction of the Wide Area 3D Measurement System (WAMS) was tested as a method for faster inspection of the ICCWR. Optimization of the WAMS parameters for data collection was carried out using a generic tear-drop type sample containing large and fine Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) fractures and high resolution images were compared to the image obtained with the LCM. Although the image with the LCM shows higher resolution than the WAMS images, the small features can be still identified in the WAMS images. The advantage of collecting data for the full circumference using the WAMS is that it can take about a week to complete, which represents 1/16 of the time needed with the LCM. Nonetheless, both systems offer capabilities that combined can be utilized to expedite the examination of the ICCWR. The WAMS can be utilized to obtain images for faster screening or identification of corrosion features on the surface while the LCM can be utilized to obtain higher resolution images of those areas identified by the WAMS.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Applied Science Investigations to Facilitate Closure of the F-Area and H-Area Seepage Basins

This report provides a roadmap of applied science studies that will facilitate reaching long term monitoring end state corrective actions for groundwater contamination at the F-Area Seepage Basins and the H-Area Seepage Basins at the Savannah River Site in Aiken, SC. The F-Area and H-Area Seepage Basins are waste units on the Savannah River Site in Aiken, SC at which low-level radioactive solutions were disposed into unlined basins, resulting in groundwater contamination. The current contaminants of interest in the groundwater are tritium, iodine-129, strontium-90, uranium isotopes and nitrate. Remediation at both sites has continued since 1988, consisting of closure and capping of the basins, operation of a groundwater pump-and-treat system from 1997 to 2004, and replacement of this system with a comprehensive in situ attenuation-based remedy. This report was requested by the U.S. Department of Energy - Office of Environmental Management in consultation with the Savannah River National Laboratory and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions - Area Completions Projects to provide a scientific basis for proactively addressing groundwater issues that may need to be resolved prior to final corrective actions at the F-Area and H-Area Seepage Basins.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Characterization of Tank 11H Samples from Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) Batch 3 - Intermediate and Final Samples

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. The TCCR unit processes dissolved salt from Tank 10H through a series of ion exchange columns containing crystalline silicotitanate (CST) and the effluent is then discharged to Tank 11H. Four interim samples pulled from Tank 11H during and just after the completion of processing of Batch 3 through the TCCR process have been analyzed for 137 Cs activity and density. The 137 Cs activity was found to decrease with each subsequent sample, which is consistent with the addition of decontaminated solution to Tank 11H. When compared to the expected composition from mixing the Tank 10H Batch 3 feed with the material already present in Tank 11H, the bulk chemical composition was as expected. A corrosion control sample collected from Tank 11H in June 2020 showed changes in the chemical composition and 137 Cs activity when compared to the composition measured at the end of Batch 2 processing. As there were no additions made to the tank during this period, these changes were attributed to leaching of the solids present in Tank 11H. Additional analyses of the 4 th interim sample are pending and will be documented in a revision to this report.

11H↗

DOE OSTI2020

Characterization of Tank 11H samples from tank closure cesium removal (TCCR) Batch 3 - intermediate and final samples

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. The TCCR unit processes dissolved salt from Tank 10H through a series of ion exchange columns containing crystalline silicotitanate (CST) and the effluent is then discharged to Tank 11H. Four interim samples pulled from Tank 11H during and just after the completion of processing of Batch 3 through the TCCR process have been analyzed for 137 Cs activity and density. The 137 Cs activity was found to decrease with each subsequent sample, which is consistent with the addition of decontaminated solution to Tank 11H. When compared to the expected composition from mixing the Tank 10H Batch 3 feed with the material already present in Tank 11H, the bulk chemical composition was as expected. A corrosion control sample collected from Tank 11H in June 2020 showed changes in the chemical composition and 137 Cs activity when compared to the composition measured at the end of Batch 2 processing. As there were no additions made to the tank during this period, these changes were attributed to leaching of the solids present in Tank 11H. Revision 1 of this report contains additional analyses of the fourth interim sample including inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) results and activities of other radionuclides. These results are consistent with the previously reported results, showing leaching from the Tank 11H heel. Notably, the 90 Sr activity was about 2.7x higher than calculated from a mixture of the original Tank 11H supernate and the Tank 10H supernate as treated by TCCR, suggesting additional leaching of Sr from the Tank 11H heel solids. In addition, Revision 1 includes analysis results for the Batch 3 Post-Production surface and variable depth samples collected in October of 2020. The Post-Production surface sample was similar in composition to the fourth interim surface sample, except for the increased Cs-137 and oxalate concentrations that were presumably associated with leaching of the Tank 11H heel solids.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2021

CST R9120-B 30x60 Media Pretreatment and Digestion Standard Development to Support Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR-1A) Operations

In support of continued operations of Savannah River Remediation’s (SRR) ion exchange process to remove radioactive cesium from Savannah River Site (SRS) dissolved saltcake, referred to as the Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A process (TCCR-1A; containing the second set of at-tank ion exchange columns), SRNL was tasked with: 1) validating the field protocol planned for pretreating the crystalline silicotitanate (CST) ion exchange media to be used in the columns, 2) preparing CST media for use in in-tank batch contact testing, and 3) developing a digestion standard to verify complete CST dissolution prior to characterization following each in-tank batch contact test. A procedure (SRNL L29 Manual, ITS-0229) was developed previously in support of the TCCR Demonstration (which contained the first set of ion exchange columns) based on evaluations of a different CST production lot with a larger particle size range to document the protocol for pretreating CST utilizing conditions similar to what will be performed in the field.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2020

CY2019 Annual Closure Monitoring Report for Corrective Action Unit 98, Frenchman Flat, Underground Test Area, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada (January 2019–December 2019), Revision 1

Three types of monitoring are performed for CAU 98: water quality, water level, and institutional control. These are monitored to determine whether the URs remain protective of human health and the environment, and to ensure that the regulatory boundary objectives are being met. Monitoring data will be used in the future, once multiple years of data are available, to evaluate consistency with the groundwater flow and contaminant transport models because the contaminant boundaries calculated with the models are the primary basis of the UR boundaries. Six wells were sampled for water-quality monitoring in 2019. Contaminants of concern were detected only in the two source/plume wells already known to contain contamination as a result of a radionuclide migration experiment. Tritium concentrations in both of these wells, RNM-2S and UE-5n, remain above the Safe Drinking Water Act maximum contaminant level of 20,000 picocuries per liter but declined in 2019 as compared to measurements in 2018. All other contaminants of concern are below the minimum detection level plus analytical error. The water-level monitoring network includes 16 wells. Depth to water measured in 2019 is generally consistent with recent measurements for all wells. Many wells continue to exhibit a long-term downward trend in water level, though changes from 2018 to 2019 are minimal. The sharp 2016 decline in water level in Well ER-5-3-2 remains unexplained, with the lower level persisting through 2019. Rising water-level trends continue to be observed in Well ER-5-3 deep piezometer and former water supply Well WW-5A. Water supply Well WW-5B experienced a rise in water level as a result of an absence of pumping in the first part of the year (due to a mechanical problem), whereas water levels declined in WW-4 and WW-4A in response to greater pumping in 2019. Institutional control monitoring confirmed the URs are recorded in U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Air Force land management systems, and that no activities within Frenchman Flat basin are occurring that could potentially affect the contaminant boundaries. Survey of groundwater resources in basins surrounding Frenchman Flat similarly identify no current or pending development that would indicate the need to increase monitoring activities or would otherwise cause concern for the closure decision. The URs continue to prevent exposure of the public, workers, and the environment to contaminants of concern by preventing use of potentially contaminated groundwater.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗