SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
High altitude base heating of 4-engine rocket nozzle configuration
The NASA Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle is composed of four RS-25 liquid oxygen and hydrogen rocket engines in the Core Stage (CS). The SLS Core Stage went through Green Run hotfire testing at NASA Stennis Space Center’s B-2 test facility in 2021. The main goal of this testing was to confirm Core Stage tanking, propulsion and thrust vector control systems operations and performance to verify with predicted models. Two hot-fire (HF) test sequences were performed with the first one (HF1) in January for a test duration of 70 seconds and the second (HF2) testing completed in March for a test duration of 500 seconds. This paper focuses on the base heating anomalies observed during HF1 and HF2 where an extensive fire was observed along the Core Stage base heat shield during test operations. This environment was not anticipated and led to extensive unplanned damage to the thermal protection system which was augmented for flight. Green Run observations also led to a reassessment of flight environments for Artemis I. This paper discusses the potential cause of the anomalies, the flow physics, the reconstructed base environments, and mitigation plans for HF2 and flight.
The NASA Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle is composed of four RS-25 liquid oxygen and hydrogen rocket engines in the Core Stage (CS). The SLS Core Stage went through Green Run hot-fire testing at NASA Stennis Space Center’s B-2 test facility in 2021. The main goal of this testing was to confirm Core Stage tanking, propulsion and thrust vector control systems operations and performance to verify with predicted models. Two hot-fire (HF) test sequences were performed with the first one (HF1) in January for a test duration of 70 seconds and the second (HF2) testing completed in March for a test duration of 500 seconds. This paper focuses on the base heating anomalies observed during HF1 and HF2 where an extensive fire was observed along the Core Stage base heat shield during test operations. This environment was not anticipated and led to extensive unplanned damage to the thermal protection system which was augmented for flight. Green Run observations also led to a reassessment of flight environments for Artemis I. This paper discusses the potential cause of the anomalies, the flow physics, the reconstructed base environments, and mitigation plans for HF2 and flight.
Space shuttle base heating tests were conducted using a 0.040-scale model in the Plum Brook Space Power Facility of The NASA Lewis Research Center. The tests measured heat transfer rates, pressure distributions, and gas recovery temperatures on the orbiter vehicle 2A base configuration resulting from engine plume impingement. One hundred and sixty-eight hydrogen-oxygen engine firings were made at simulated flight altitudes ranging from 120,000 to 360,000 feet.
First-stage and second-stage heating environments of the base region of the Space Shuttle are characterized in detail in terms of Orbiter-main-engine-plume and booster-plume radiation, freestream-air convective cooling, and reversed-plume-flow convective heating as they affect each base-region design point. Design predictions are compared with selected heating-rate data from flights STS-1 through STS-5; the flight data are found to show excellent interflight repeatability independent of small changes in trajectory, and to verify the validity of the prediction methodology. The impact of individual flight events on base heating is indicated.
A reverse Monte Carlo radiative transfer code to predict rocket plume base heating is presented. In this technique rays representing the radiation propagation are traced backwards in time from the receiving surface to the point of emission in the plume. This increases the computational efficiency relative to the forward Monte Carlo technique when calculating the radiation reaching a specific point, as only the rays that strike the receiving point are considered.
Rocket vehicle base heating problem, and liquid rocket propellant plume characteristics
A three-dimensional, unstructured-grid, pressure-based, reacting flow, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and heat transfer methodology was employed to study the base-heating environment of a lunar lander demonstrator, during terrestrial ground testing. Two base-heating environments were investigated: lunar lander demonstrator sitting on pad, and lunar lander demonstrator hovering at a distance above ground. Two unique and quite different base-flow physics are found for these two cases. In the case of demonstrator sitting on pad, the computed heat fluxes are high and the base flow is unsteady, caused by a Coanda effect precursor that makes the fountain jet oscillate about the center of the base. For the second case, due to the higher elevation of the demonstrator and the layout of the nozzles, the Coanda effect forces the fountain jet to be attached to two of the nozzle plumes, resulting in much lower computed base heat fluxes.
Thermal engineers often create custom heat maps to analyze their thermal model. However, generating a heat map is difficult because thermal simulation only readily provide attributes of simulated nodes such as temperature, capacitance, heat generation, and a network of conductances. Heat flow values are a derived quantity from the nodal attributes, and the data processing and management of heat flow between nodes quickly become difficult for large models. Deriving a network of heat flow values requires vast amount of calculations and data handling, heat map generation process generally suffers from processing speed, loss of accuracy, and/or presentation of data in a useful format. Heat Analysis Manager (HAM) is a Thermal Desktop (TD) based free multi-purpose tool developed to aid thermal engineers in analyzing their thermal model, including a heat map generation functionality. HAM’s heat map generator retains accuracy and fast processing speed by utilizing TD’s application programming interface (API) and built-in TD’s “Qflow from Results.” Furthermore, HAM’s heat map output is presented in an easily customizable format in Excel, allowing users to create various custom visual heat maps. A full description of how HAM utilizes TD’s API to create a customizable heat map is provided. A simple model demonstration is included along with step-by-step procedures on creating custom heat maps. HAM’s heat map result has been verified against TD’s and other heat map generation software, and verification methods are also included.
The Space Launch System (SLS) base heating test is broken down into two test programs: (1) Pathfinder and (2) Main Test. The Pathfinder Test Program focuses on the design, development, hot-fire test and performance analyses of the 2% sub-scale SLS core-stage and booster element propulsion systems. The core-stage propulsion system is composed of four gaseous oxygen/hydrogen RS-25D model engines and the booster element is composed of two aluminum-based model solid rocket motors (SRMs). The first section of the paper discusses the motivation and test facility specifications for the test program. The second section briefly investigates the internal flow path of the design. The third section briefly shows the performance of the model RS-25D engines and SRMs for the conducted short duration hot-fire tests. Good agreement is observed based on design prediction analysis and test data. This program is a challenging research and development effort that has not been attempted in 40+ years for a NASA vehicle.
Shock tunnel preflight assessment of Apollo Block 2 command module base heating
An integrated analytical tool has been developed for use in designing optimized space-based heat pipe radiator systems. This code, SPRITE-1, incorporates the thermal, structural, and reliability aspects of the radiator into a single framework from which a physically consistent design can be obtained. A parametric study of the integral heat pipe panel radiator was performed using SPRITE-1, and a preliminary minimum mass design was obtained. The radiator design is summarized, and the mass minimization method and results are presented.
The feasibility of simulating in a laboratory the heating environment of the base region of the proposed reusable single-stage-to-orbit vehicle during its ascent is examined. The propellant is assumed to consist of hydrocarbon (RP1), liquid hydrogen (LH2), and liquid oxygen (LO2), which produces CO and H2 as the main combustible components of the exhaust effluent. Since afterburning in the recirculating region can dictate the temperature of the base flowfield and ensuing heating phenomena, laboratory simulation focuses on the thermochemistry of the afterburning. By extrapolating the Saturn V flight data, the Damkohler number, in the base region with afterburning for SSTO vehicle, is estimated to be between 30 and 140. It is shown that a flow with a Damkohler number of 1.8 to 25 can be produced in an impulse ground test facility. Even with such a reduced Damkohler number, the experiment can adequately reproduce the main features of the flight environment.
A series of tests was performed with a 0.040 scale Shuttle Orbiter Base Heating Model in a large vacuum chamber to determine the thermal effects of engine plume recirculation and direct engine plume impingement. The oxygen- and hydrogen-fueled model was fired through a range of simulated altitudes and configurations with varied engine gimbal angles and 'engine-out' combinations. Some of the special problems associated with conducting tests of this type related primarily to obtaining valid temperature and pressure data in the extremely short run times available. Run time is limited by the reflection of shock waves from the chamber wall, propellant charge-tube wave times, the time required to reach steady-state conditions for the engines, and model heating limitations. The 'data window' for potentially valid data usually begins with stabilized engine conditions and terminates with pressure perturbations from either of the aforementioned shock waves. The general approach for coping with these limitations and the method used to obtain valid data during the short data window (of the order of thirty milliseconds) are discussed.
This document is the final report for NASA MSFC Contract NAS8-38141. The contracted effort had the broad objective of improving the launch vehicles ascent base heating methodology to improve and simplify the determination of that environment for Advanced Launch System (ALS) concepts. It was pursued as an Advanced Development Plan (ADP) for the Joint DoD/NASA ALS program office with project management assigned to NASA/MSFC. The original study was to be completed in 26 months beginning Sep. 1989. Because of several program changes and emphasis on evolving launch vehicle concepts, the period of performance was extended to the current completion date of Nov. 1992. A computer code incorporating the methodology improvements into a quick prediction tool was developed and is operational for basic configuration and propulsion concepts. The code and its users guide are also provided as part of the contract documentation. Background information describing the specific objectives, limitations, and goals of the contract is summarized. A brief chronology of the ALS/NLS program history is also presented to provide the reader with an overview of the many variables influencing the development of the code over the past three years.
A rocket of the 1000-pound-thrust class using liquid oxygen and JP-4 fuel as propellant was installed in the Lewis 8- by 6-foot tunnel to permit a controlled study of some of the factors affecting the heating of a rocket-missile base. Temperatures measured in the base region are presented from findings of three motor extension lengths relative to the base. Data are also presented for two combustion efficiency levels in the rocket motor. Temperature as high as 1200 F was measured in the base region because of the ignition of burnable rocket gases. combustibles that are dumped into the base by accessories seriously aggravate the base-burning temperature rise.
Introduction: This lunar lander demonstrator, known as XL-1T (terrestrial), is a collaborative effort between Masten Space Systems and NASA, under NASA’s Lunar CATALYST (also known as Lunar Cargo Transportation and Landing by Soft Touchdown) initiative; The lunar lander is a reusable terrestrial test bed for Masten’s powered decent landing system, and will be controlled by four throttleable main engines utilizing green hypergolic propellants; One of the concerns for a four-engine vehicle like this demonstrator, is the potential for a severe base-heating environment, caused by the formation of a “fountain jet” during testing. Fountain jet is an unique base flow physics which was discovered during the development of the DC-X vehicle.
ven with great advances in computational techniques and computing power during recent decades, the modeling of unsteady separated flows, such as those encountered in the wake of a re-entry vehicle, continues to be one of the most challenging problems in CFD. Of most interest to the aerothermodynamics community is accurately predicting transient heating loads on the base of a blunt body, which would result in reduced uncertainties and safety margins when designing a re-entry vehicle. However, the prediction of heat transfer can vary widely depending on the turbulence model employed. Therefore, selecting a turbulence model which realistically captures as much of the flow physics as possible will result in improved results. Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models have become increasingly popular due to their good performance with attached flows, and the relatively quick turnaround time to obtain results. However, RANS methods cannot accurately simulate unsteady separated wake flows, and running direct numerical simulation (DNS) on such complex flows is currently too computationally expensive. Large Eddy Simulation (LES) techniques allow for the computation of the large eddies, which contain most of the Reynolds stress, while modeling the smaller (subgrid) eddies. This results in models which are more computationally expensive than RANS methods, but not as prohibitive as DNS. By complimenting an LES approach with a RANS model, a hybrid LES/RANS method resolves the larger turbulent scales away from surfaces with LES, and switches to a RANS model inside boundary layers. As pointed out by Bertin et al., this type of hybrid approach has shown a lot of promise for predicting turbulent flows, but work is needed to verify that these models work well in hypersonic flows. The very limited amounts of flight and experimental data available presents an additional challenge for researchers. Recently, a joint study by NASA and CUBRC has focused on collecting heat transfer data on the backshell of a scaled model of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV). Heat augmentation effects due to the presence of cavities and RCS jet firings were also investigated. The high quality data produced by this effort presents a new set of data which can be used to assess the performance of CFD methods. In this work, a hybrid LES/RANS model developed at North Carolina State University (NCSU) is used to simulate several runs from these experiments, and evaluate the performance of high fidelity methods as compared to more typical RANS models. .