SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Linear Induction Accelerator”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2023

Beam Envelope Variation due to Space-Charge Neutralization

Our non-invasive, time-resolved diamagnetic loop measurements of beam size during the electron current-pulse flattop at the exit of our 20-MeV linear induction accelerator revealed that the beam size varied by about 13% during the current flattop. This was an unexpected result, since both current and energy were constant during the interval of radius variation. One possible cause, poor vacuum, was investigated using a time resolved envelope equation. It was found that sufficiently high residual-gas pressure in the downstream transport region could result in the observed variation.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Texas Tech Student Outreach

Giving student outreach presentation covering the basic concepts of linear induction accelerators and how they are applied to the electrical engineering field.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Beam Breakup Simulations for the Scorpius Flash-Radiography Accelerator

Beam breakup (BBU) in linear induction accelerators (LIAs) used for flash radiography is problematic because the high-frequency beam motion can blur the source spot, thereby degrading resolution. Amplification of BBU depends directly on details of cell design and is suppressed in operation by the solenoidal magnetic field focusing on the electron beam. Therefore, much effort has gone into design of the cells and magnetic focusing for the new Scorpius radiography LIA. Here, in this article, we use computer simulations to demonstrate that BBU in Scorpius should be no more than in present radiography LIAs at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

Correcting Magnetic-Field Diffusion Effects in Beam Position Monitors

Beam position monitors (BPMs) provide timeresolved measurements of the current and centroid position of high-current electron beams in linear induction accelerators (LIAs). The data from some types of BPMs can be influenced by magnetic field diffusion into the surrounding metal. We derive an estimate of the correction factor from first principles, and show how it is applied in practice to nearly eliminate the effect from the data.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Magnetic-Field Diffusion Effects in Beam Position Monitors III: Application to DARHT-II Beam Data

Beam position monitors (BPMs) provide time-resolved measurements of the current and centroid position of high-current electron beams in linear induction accelerators (LIAs). One of the types of detectors used in BPMs is the B-dot loop, which generates a signal from the EMF due to the time varying magnetic flux through the loop. If some of the boundaries of the loop are composed of thick metal walls with finite conductivity, the resulting signal must be corrected for the magnetic field diffusion into the metal. The theoretically predicted flux due to diffusion is in remarkable agreement with experimental measurements. Although accurate BPM measurements of beam current require correction of magnetic field diffusion, accurate measurement of beam position requires no correction. In this note, we present experimental validation of current and position results from a prototype detector employing finite conductivity sensing areas, based on experiments on the DARHT-II LIA.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Magnetic-Field Diffusion Effects in Beam Position Monitors II: Application to Calibration Single-Pulse Data

Beam position monitors (BPMs) provide time-resolved measurements of the current and centroid position of high-current electron beams in linear induction accelerators (LIAs). One of the types of detectors used in BPMs is the B-dot loop, which generates a signal from the EMF due to the time varying magnetic flux through the loop. If some of the boundaries of the loop are composed of thick metal walls with finite conductivity, the resulting signal must be corrected for the magnetic field diffusion into the metal. From first principles, we have derived the perturbation to BPM measurements due to this effect. The theoretical framework was used to design an algorithm for signal correction that does not require knowledge of the time history of the magnetic flux being measured. Corrected signals based on that process compared favorably with the know reference signals in a laboratory calibration test sequence.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Design and Performance of the Solid-State Laser Trigger System for HERMES III

The HERMES III accelerator is an 18-20 MeV linear induction accelerator constructed at Sandia National Laboratories in the late 1980s and which continues operation to this day. As part of recent modernization efforts, the laser triggering system on the accelerator has been replaced with a newly designed solid-state system. This system consists of ten Nd:YAG lasers, each having a nominal output energy of 40-45 mJ at a wavelength of 266 nm. The beam from each laser is split such that it triggers two of the Rimfire gas switches on the accelerator. Compared to the previous laser triggering system, this arrangement makes it possible to more readily tailor the final output pulse shape, and overall reliability for the accelerator's operation with these new lasers has increased. The design of this new laser triggering system is presented in this paper, along with details pertaining to the energy budgeting, optical beam paths, and electrical triggering of the lasers. Initial operational data from the HERMES III accelerator using this new triggering system is also presented.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

DOE OSTI2024

An Improved Beam Position Monitor for Scorpius and the DARHT Multi-Pulse Test Line

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Magnetic-Field Diffusion Effects in Beam Position Monitors I: Theory

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

DOE OSTI2022

Prospects for Machine Learning and Pulse Shaping on the Scorpius Accelerator [Poster]

The Advanced Sources and Detectors (ASD) project aims to build Scorpius, a multi pulse linear induction accelerator capable of delivering a 1.4 kA electron beam at energies up to 24 MeV. One of the primary advancements of Scorpius is the use of solid state pulsed power (SSPP) to provide flexibility in pulse shaping by independently triggering 45 individual stages stacked in each of 984 line replaceable units (LRU), with 168 LRUs dedicated to the injector. By leveraging circuit modeling of each LRU stage, a machine learning model of the SSPP will be developed to allow for optimization of the pulse shape, including pulse flattening and reflection mitigation. Particle-in-cell simulations of Scorpius have, for example, demonstrated that reducing reflections during multi-pulse operation mitigates beam spill by preventing the production of off-energy electrons between pulses, thereby abating stimulated ion desorption from the wall and beam charge neutralization. This machine learning model will be validated and tuned with experimental data collected from the Scorpius injector and Integrated Test Stand

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Current-Pulse Excitation of Beam Breakup in Scorpius

Perhaps the most dangerous instability for electron linear induction accelerators (LIA) is the beam breakup (BBU) instability. For flash-radiography LIAs like DARHT or Scorpius it is particularly troublesome, because low-level high-frequency BBU motion can blur the source spot. Theoretically, the number of e-foldings Γ of exponential BBU growth in an LIA is linearly proportional to beam current I, number of accelerating cells N, and transverse coupling impedance Z ⊥ , and inversely proportional to the strength of magnetic focusing B.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Scorpius Beam Physics Overview and a Few Remaining Concerns [Slides]

With so many new faces on board, I thought to take the opportunity to review some of the many beam physics issues that might cause problems after Scorpius is built and accelerating electron beams. Mitigation measures for all of these have been incorporated in the Scorpius design, wherever possible. In this talk, I’ll quickly review the physics issues that I feel are most problematic for Scorpius, based on my own experience, and that documented by other workers in the field of linear induction accelerators.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Re-Analysis of DARHT Axis 2 S4 Magnet Sweep Measurements

The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility provides flash radiography capabilities using two electron Linear Induction Accelerators (LIA’s). Understanding fundamental properties of the electron beams is essential to optimizing spot size and dose for radiography. This work describes distribution measurements of a single-kicked electron beam (16.5MeV, 1.7kA, 60ns) at a location downstream at imaging station C on DARHT Axis 2. The beam at station C is focused by the S4 solenoid located upstream. The beam distribution is measured by imaging optical transition radiation (OTR) from electrons striking a 51-µm thick titanium foil. This data and analysis were originally published by Ekdahl. The results here are a re-analysis of the asymmetric halo emittance contribution as compared to the emittance resulting from the FWHM of the distribution. This is accomplished using xtr2 fits to the data which include non-linear magnetic field effects in S4. Also examined are the calculated S4 spherical aberration contributions to the emittance using xtr.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Scorpius and The Integrated Test Stand [Slides]

Scorpius will provide (DARHT scale) flash-radiography of dynamic nuclear material. DARHT radiographs non-nuclear (surrogate) materials at a cadence of 8 to 10 hydrodynamic shots per year. Scorpius will radiograph nuclear material at an initial cadence of about 2 to 3 subcritical shots per year in a more challenging environment. Both machines are Linear Induction Accelerators (LIAs) and generate X-rays with high-current, relativistic electron beams. Their use is termed Flash-Radiography.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

DOE OSTI2020

DARHT Axis 1 Time-Resolved Injector Energy Measurement

The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility provides flash radiography capabilities using electron Linear Induction Accelerators (LIA’s). The strict requirements for flash radiography require a detailed understanding of the LIA’s performance, including precision measurements of the injected electron beam energy. The DARHT Axis 1 injector of produces a 3-4 MeV, 1-2 kA, 80-ns-FWHM electron beam. Injector capacitive monitors (EVACSUM) are summed to give the injector beam energy. Calibration of EVACSUM was last done in 1999 and is needed. In addition, the flatness of the injector drive voltage is controlled by a peaking capacitor in a Blumlien that is charged by the prime power tank. Time resolved measurements are used to optimize the value of this capacitor.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

DOE OSTI2020

DARHT Axis 1 Performance Results with and without a Blumlein Charge Unit

The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility provides flash radiography capabilities using two electron Linear Induction Accelerators (LIA’s). Axis 1 of DARHT produces a 20- MeV, 2-kA, 80-ns-FWHM electron beam. As DARHT Axis 1 enters its twentieth year of operation, the probability of Blumlein Charge Unit (BCU) failure has increased and the risk of a failure on the day of an explosive experiment has become more likely. Replacement time for a BCU is four to six hours. This report examines the radiographic and beam transport effect of operating the accelerator with a missing or reduced charge voltage BCU. The results are compared with normal, full machine operation. A prescription for alternate operation with missing or reduced charge voltage on BCU22 is given.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

DOE OSTI2020

Optimization of DARHT Axis 1 Injector Voltage

The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility provides flash radiography capabilities using two electron Linear Induction Accelerators (LIA’s). Axis-1 of DARHT produces a 20- MeV, 2-kA, 80-ns-FWHM electron beam. The strict requirements for flash radiography require a detailed understanding of the LIA’s performance, including precision measurements of the injector electron beam energy. The technique for time resolved measurement of the electron beam energy using electron Permanent Magnet Spectrometer (ePMSpec) has been developed. The electron energy then is used to infer the voltage produced by the injector pulsed power. The injector pulsed power of DARHT I consists of a 1.5-MV, glycol-insulated Blumlein that is pulsecharged by a step-up transformer and switched by four, laser-triggered spark gaps. A series of increasing impedance transmission lines are used to transform the output voltage of the Blumlein to a maximum of 3.8MV at the diode. Figure 1a shows a graphic of the Axis-1 prime power tank, Blumlein and downstream transmission lines. The injector pulse power is designed to produce voltage on a velvet cathode located in the vacuum vessel. The specifications of the voltage-pulse flat-top over 60ns is +/-1%. A key element in the high-voltage circuit is the ethylene glycol Blumlein. The outer volume, adjacent to the laser triggered switches of the Blumlein, is a peaking capacitor. This is an independent volume that contains a mixture of ethylene glycol and water to make it an adjustable capacitor of 380 to 750 pF.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

2020 Review of Axis 2 rf

An intense relativistic electron beam can produce radiofrequency (rf) radiation in many ways. The DARHT II linear induction accelerator produces a 17 MeV, 1.65 kA beam. The dominant sources of rf at DARHT-II and the methods used to suppress this rf are well documented. This note will examine the observed rf over the past six years and its impact on the beam. The recorded waveforms for each hydro starting with 4011 from 10/29/14 are examined to identify the presence of rf. The hydros are chosen because they represent the optimal accelerator performance at any given time rather than tuning or beam studies.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗