Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “spaceport”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

Spaceport Command and Control System Automated Testing

The Spaceport Command and Control System (SCCS) is the National Aeronautics and Space Administrations (NASA) launch control system for the Orion capsule and Space Launch System, the next generation manned rocket currently in development. This large system requires high quality testing that will properly measure the capabilities of the system. Automating the test procedures would save the project time and money. Therefore, the Electrical Engineering Division at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) has recruited interns for the past two years to work alongside full-time engineers to develop these automated tests, as well as innovate upon the current automation process.

LCS↗

Spaceport Command and Control System Software Development

The Spaceport Command and Control System (SCCS) is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) launch control system for the Orion capsule and Space Launch System, the next generation manned rocket currently in development. This large system requires a large amount of intensive testing that will properly measure the capabilities of the system. Automating the test procedures would save the project money from human labor costs, as well as making the testing process more efficient. Therefore, the Exploration Systems Division (formerly the Electrical Engineering Division) at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) has recruited interns for the past two years to work alongside full-time engineers to develop these automated tests, as well as innovate upon the current automation process.

Glasser, Abraham↗

Spaceport Command and Control System Automation Testing

The Spaceport Command and Control System (SCCS) is the National Aeronautics and Space Administrations (NASA) launch control system for the Orion capsule and Space Launch System, the next generation manned rocket currently in development. This large system requires high quality testing that will properly measure the capabilities of the system. Automating the test procedures would save the project time and money. Therefore, the Electrical Engineering Division at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) has recruited interns for the past two years to work alongside full-time engineers to develop these automated tests, as well as innovate upon the current automation process.

Testing↗

Spaceport Command and Control System Automated Verification Software Development

For as long as we have walked the Earth, humans have always been explorers. We have visited our nearest celestial body and sent Voyager 1 beyond our solar system1 out into interstellar space. Now it is finally time for us to step beyond our home and onto another planet. The Spaceport Command and Control System (SCCS) is being developed along with the Space Launch System (SLS) to take us on a journey further than ever attempted. Within SCCS are separate subsystems and system level software, each of which have to be tested and verified. Testing is a long and tedious process, so automating it will be much more efficient and also helps to remove the possibility of human error from mission operations. I was part of a team of interns and full-time engineers who automated tests for the requirements on SCCS, and with that was able to help verify that the software systems are performing as expected.

Automation↗

Spaceport Command and Control System: Network Engineering

The Spaceport Command and Control System (SCCS) project's goal is to facilitate the checkout and launch of NASA's next generation SLS vehicle in order to enable human exploration through deep space. SCCS is made up of complex software that will control and monitor the Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft. Once it is fully developed, SCCS will be a large improvement to previous software since it takes advantage of modern computers and information making it faster and more reliable than the software used previously on the Shuttle program. The software will be tailored to the specific needs of the Space Launch System (SLS) and Orion spacecraft. These three projects will be brought together for the launch of Exploration Mission-1.

Mackh, Katherine↗

System Applications Software Development and Testing for the Spaceport Command and Control System

Known as "America's Spaceport," one of Kennedy Space Center's (KSC) primary responsibilities is the successful preparation for and launch of rockets into space. KSC's Engineering Software Branch has been tasked with creating a new command and control system that will provide check-out and launch control for future rockets and spacecraft. While work on the software began several years ago, development is ongoing and the operators who use the software on a daily basis have requested several features to improve their user experience. My internship in the fall of 2018 involved developing the source code and unit tests for two of these requested features: "Display Data with Persistence" (DDP) and "Save Events Button" (SEB). DDP's primary goal is to aid with ergonomics. Currently, users must press-and-hold on the mouse button to display information about points on a data plot. Once DDP is integrated, users will have the ability to double-click on a data plot to display that same information with persistence. Independent from DDP, the SEB provides users the ability to take information about different events that occur in the control system and save that data into a simple Comma Separated File (.csv) file format for easier analysis at a future time.

Niemoeller, Samantha↗

Launch Control System / Spaceport Command and Control

NASA is developing the next generation launch vehicle that will take astronauts further into space than any previous manned vehicle. This project has many facets and one of them, the Spaceport Command and Control System (SCCS), was the primary focus of my work during this internship. A vital ability of SCCS is the communication from the firing rooms to the ground support equipment for the vehicle on the launch pad. During this internship, I was part of the Computer Systems Hardware Team, a group of engineers who handle the computer and networking aspects of the SCCS project. My job was to construct, handle, and test computer and network machines, configurations and cables.

Barbaro, Mark A.↗

Launch Control System / Spaceport Command and Control System

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is currently developing the next generation launch vehicle that will take American astronauts, from American soil, even further into space. Our project for this semester dealt with the Spaceport Command and Control System (SCCS). SCCS provides a means of communication between the Firing Rooms and ground support equipment for the vehicle on the launch pad. For this internship, we became part of the Computer Systems Hardware Team. This team of engineers handle the computer and networking aspects of SCCS. During this internship, we learned about Linux operating systems and network configuration.

Ferrell, Sean P.↗

The Spaceport Command and Control System Security Assessor Project

This Summer, I worked as a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Internships and Fellowships (NIF) intern under my mentor, Jill Giles within the Software Engineering Branch. Within this project, I worked alongside the Cyber Security branch to identify a list of Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) software to analyze, research, and gain insight about potential vulnerabilities within the software that could become a threat of attack. After identifying the list of COTS software, my team and I used Microsoft Excel to create a worksheet to easily organize and design a questionnaire about the software. Security reports weregiven to us to identify the software used on the machines in the firing rooms. With these reports, we created a script that would populate the database with the software information to identify potential security weaknesses of COTS software.The goal of the project was to produce a final report, summarizing the most vulnerable launch control system servers and configurations and document vulnerabilities, residual risk, likelihood, and consequence. This project is important for the Cyber Security and Information Technology branches because it will identify security weaknesses and help to mitigate risk. From the Spaceport Command and Control System Security Assessor Project, I learned how to properly identify weaknesses and vulnerabilities within software and how to mitigate the risks within the software. This project also taught me how to create databases using scripts and input files.

Destani Satora Van Arsdalen↗

Safety Culture at the World’s Premier Multi-User Spaceport

NASA’s Agency-wide Safety Culture is implemented at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) using a unique strategy due an unparalleled approach in making human spaceflight history. Kennedy Space Center, the world’s premier multi-user spaceport, enables U.S. government and commercial space access, while providing the world a resource to allow the exploration of and the ability to work in space. A consistently healthy safety culture at KSC is imperative for mission success: desired achievements, protection of space flight hardware, and ultimately, the preservation of human life requires the support of a healthy safety culture. Emphasis on the NASA Agency-wide development of Safety Culture began with the conception of the NASA Agency Safety Culture Working Group. After the devastating loss of life and mission of the Space Shuttle Colombia, a broken safety culture was identified as an organizational cause by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report. Thus, the Agency Safety Culture Working Group was developed in 2009 to assess the status of the Agency’s Safety Culture, while addressing safety culture concerns at the NASA Center-level. A Five-factor model was developed to serve as the guiding principles for Safety Culture: 1) Reporting Culture, 2) Just Culture, 3) Flexible Culture, 4) Learning Culture, and 5) Engaged Culture. These five factors are included in the NASA Safety Culture logo, which was intentionally designed as a DNA double helix to prompt the permeation of safety into day-to-day work. KSC specifically implements the NASA Agency-wide Safety Culture principles in a tailored approach that is relevant to the diversity of work being performed. An emphasis is placed on the implementation to include safety at home, not exclusively at work. This emphasis is a KSC-specific element that has been intentionally added to promote a closed loop Safety Culture. To advertise the safety culture, various safety and health events are held throughout the calendar year, providing innovative speakers and engaging activities, while also promoting a wide range of curated safety initiatives. Development and continuous improvement of the KSC safety tracking database, allows for advanced tracking-to-closure, along with providing data sets used to identify areas of emphasis. Other safety initiatives rely solely on employee participation, such as the photo challenges; participants are encouraged to identify and capture themselves, coworkers, or family members participating in safe or healthy activities to share with others within the Center and at Agency levels. Fabrication of exclusive videos and graphics are utilized to advertise and inform employee of safety initiatives, upcoming safety events, and general dispersion of safety information. In addition, an anonymous Agency-wide Safety Culture Survey is advertised, administered, and analyzed at Kennedy Space Center, with the purpose of receiving basic feedback on Safety Culture perceptions to help prevent future incidents from occurring. Through these briefly identified means, and many other forms of employee engagement, Kennedy Space Center aims to maintain safety in the forefront, while creating an environment where everyone trusts that safety is a priority.

Larrin E. Moody↗

Spaceport news index, December 1962 - February 1972

This index is intended to serve as a ready reference tool for the names, places and events that comprise the history of John F. Kennedy Space Center. The period covered is December 1962 through February 1972. The arrangement is alphabetical by subject; under each subject, entries are arranged alphabetically by title. To facilitate use, cross references and scope notes have been provided.

Source record↗

Moonport to Spaceport - The changing face at KSC

The facilities and planned operations of the Orbiter Processing Facility (OPF) at Kennedy Space Center are described, noting an eventual goal of five to six weeks turnaround for the vehicle. The dual-bay OPF is being developed to handle processing of two Orbiters in parallel. Once in the facility, all fuels are drained, parts and systems needing maintenance are removed for shipping and refurbishing or repair in-place, hazardous cargo is secured, and a thorough visual inspection is made of all accessible areas. Mobile launch platforms previously used as transports in the Apollo program have been upgraded and modernized and serve for the Shuttle launch preparations. Details of launch procedures are outlined, and the reduction of launch personnel to 45 persons is mentioned. Finally, details of payload insertion and mating with the Spacelab modules are described, along with the progress on the test flights.

Boggs, W. H.↗

Spaceport aurora: An orbiting transportation node

With recent announcements of the development of permanently staffed facilities on the Moon and Mars, the national space plan is in need of an infrastructure system for transportation and maintenance. A project team at the University of Houston College of Architecture and the Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture, recently examined components for a low Earth orbit (LEO) transportation node that supports a lunar build-up scenario. Areas of investigation included identifying transportation node functions, identifying existing space systems and subsystems, analyzing variable orbits, determining logistics strategies for maintenance, and investigating assured crew return systems. The information resulted in a requirements definition document, from which the team then addressed conceptual designs for a LEO transportation node. The primary design drivers included: orbital stability, maximizing human performance and safety, vehicle maintainability, and modularity within existing space infrastructure. For orbital stability, the power tower configuration provides a gravity gradient stabilized facility and serves as the backbone for the various facility components. To maximize human performance, human comfort is stressed through zoning of living and working activities, maintaining a consistent local vertical orientation, providing crew interaction and viewing areas and providing crew return vehicles. Vehicle maintainability is accomplished through dual hangars, dual work cupolas, work modules, telerobotics and a fuel depot. Modularity is incorporated using Space Station Freedom module diameter, Space Station Freedom standard racks, and interchangeable interior partitions. It is intended that the final design be flexible and adaptable to provide a facility prototype that can service multiple mission profiles using modular space systems.

Source record↗

Spaceport operations for deep space missions

Space Station Freedom is designed with the capability to cost-effectively evolve into a transportation node which can support manned lunar and Mars missions. To extend a permanent human presence to the outer planets (moon outposts) and to nearby star systems, additional orbiting space infrastructure and great advances in propulsion system and other technologies will be required. To identify primary operations and management requirements for these deep space missions, an interstellar design concept was developed and analyzed. The assembly, test, servicing, logistics resupply, and increment management techniques anticipated for lunar and Mars missions appear to provide a pattern which can be extended in an analogous manner to deep space missions. A long range, space infrastructure development plan (encompassing deep space missions) coupled with energetic, breakthrough level propulsion research should be initiated now to assist in making the best budget and schedule decisions.

Holt, Alan C.↗

Spaceport news index: January 1990 - December 1994

This index is intended to serve as a ready reference tool for the names, places, and events that comprise the history of John F. Kennedy Space Center. The arrangement is alphabetical by subject with entries arranged alphabetically by title. To facilitate use, cross references have been provided.

Source record↗

Business Plan for the Southwest Regional Spaceport: Executive Summary

A proposal for a commercial, full-service launch, tracking, and recovery complex for Reusable Launch Vehicles in New Mexico is presented. Vision, mission, business definition, competitive advantages, and business approach are formulated. Management plan and team structure are detailed, and anticipated market is described. Finance and marketing plans are presented. Financial analysis is performed.

Source record↗

Transformational Spaceport and Range Technologies: 2000-2004

This custom bibliography from the NASA Scientific and Technical Information Program lists a sampling of records found in the NASA Aeronautics and Space Database. The scope of this topic is divided into two parts and includes technologies for launch site infrastructure and range capabilities for the crew exploration vehicle and advanced heavy lift vehicles. This area of focus is one of the enabling technologies as defined by NASA s Report of the President s Commission on Implementation of United States Space Exploration Policy, published in June 2004.

Source record↗