DOE OSTI2017
The need for next-generation, accident-tolerant fuels has generated significant interest in the restart of domestic fuels testing at the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility. The TREAT reactor is designed to produce large, transient fluxes that replicate the effects of a wide variety of accident conditions on an irradiated fuel sample. Peak powers generated during short pulses approach 20 GW with a neutron flux of approximately 10{sup 17} n cm{sup -2} s{sup -1}. As part of the restart effort, new vehicle designs are being explored for sample irradiation, including the Static Environment Rodlet Transient Test Apparatus (SERTTA) and variants. As part of the SERTTA designs, micro-pocket fission detectors (MPFDs) are being explored for localized flux measurements before, during, and after transient operations. These detectors are also being considered as part of future, core-wide instrumentation for the TREAT reactor. However, the high fluxes associated with the pulses in the TREAT core present certain thermodynamic concerns given their intensity and the amount of energy they will release within the MPFDs within such a short amount of time. Assuming each fission that occurs in a MPFD results in a fission fragment depositing 85 MeV of energy in the substrate on average and each MPFD has 0.5 μg of natural uranium deposited on it, a 100 ms long pulse in the TREAT reactor at 1017 n cm{sup -2} s{sup -1} flux will produce approximately 4.6 x 10{sup 6} fissions in an MPFD. This pulse deposits 6.3 x 10{sup -5} J in the substrate over a 100 ms duration. That amount of energy is sufficient to melt roughly 33% of the Pt under the UO{sub 2} deposition or a circular spot with a diameter of approximately 860 μm. Of course, the above estimate makes a number of simplifying assumptions and ignores heat transfer, but does serve to illustrate the point that this rapid heating effect could be detrimental to the integrity and life of these in-core MPFDs. To study how these layers are affected by large transient neutron fluxes, five samples were prepared, pre-analyzed, and then subjected to a pulse in the central thimble of the Kansas State University TRIGA Mark II reactor to a peak power of 1.58 GW. After being allowed to decay to safer radiation levels, the sample substrates and coatings were inspected using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to identify any changes to their surface morphology. Indeed, certain changes were found and are discussed in greater detail in this paper.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗