DOE OSTI2016
The containment of nuclear power plants is the final barrier to keep the radioactive materials from uncontrolled release to the environment. To keep the containment integrity, pressure and temperature must be controlled by the spray system which relies on active components for PWRs with a concrete containment. To achieve a passive means to keep the containment integrity, therefore, cooling should be achieved by forming a natural circulation loop between internal cooling devices connected to an external heat sink. A system like this is often called Passive Containment Cooling System (PCCS). In the early phase of APR-1400 development, this concept was studied and VVER-1200 is also known to adopt the PCCS. The PCCS consists of a cooling device installed at the inside of the containment which is a tube-bank type heat exchanger where cooling occurs at the exterior of the tubes and a heat sink which is called Passive Containment Cooling Tank (PCCT) located at the outside of the containment on the top of the auxiliary building. In this paper, we introduce performance analysis results, utilizing the GOTHIC computer code. The PCCS performance analysis model was developed for APR-1400 which has a thermal power of 4000 MW and considers PCCS as an option to improve its safety characteristics. The PCCS which is considered in this paper is to cope with both Design Basis and Severe Accidents, considering SBO conditions. The pressure and temperature transients due to the Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) were analyzed with and without PCCS together with a normal case using the spray system. And, in particular, limitations of the PCCS in regard to mission time will be discussed. Through this study, it was found that the PCCS being considered as an option to improve the safety of APR-1400 can have almost same capability to control the containment pressure for LBLOCA as the containment spray system does. Although it would depends on the heat removal capacity of a given design such as the size of the heat transfer area, the PCCS could even replace the containment spray system. However, the PCCS may lose its capability after 24 hours as its temperature reaches that of the containment atmosphere. To extend the mission time of PCCS, either cooling or supplementary cold water needs to be provided to the external heat sink of PCCS. (authors)
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗