Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “linear induction accelerator”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 73 records · Page 4
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Design and Performance of the Solid-State Laser Trigger System for HERMES III

The HERMES III accelerator is an 18-20 MeV linear induction accelerator constructed at Sandia National Laboratories in the late 1980s and which continues operation to this day. As part of recent modernization efforts, the laser triggering system on the accelerator has been replaced with a newly designed solid-state system. This system consists of ten Nd:YAG lasers, each having a nominal output energy of 40-45 mJ at a wavelength of 266 nm. The beam from each laser is split such that it triggers two of the Rimfire gas switches on the accelerator. Compared to the previous laser triggering system, this arrangement makes it possible to more readily tailor the final output pulse shape, and overall reliability for the accelerator's operation with these new lasers has increased. The design of this new laser triggering system is presented in this paper, along with details pertaining to the energy budgeting, optical beam paths, and electrical triggering of the lasers. Initial operational data from the HERMES III accelerator using this new triggering system is also presented.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

An Improved Beam Position Monitor for Scorpius and the DARHT Multi-Pulse Test Line

Beam position monitors (BPMs) provide time-resolved measurements of the current and centroid position of high-current electron beams in linear induction accelerators (LIAs). A frequently used BPM detector is the B-dot loop, which generates a signal from the EMF generated by the time varying magnetic flux through the loop. We have developed a second generation BPM that avoids previously observed diffusion effects in earlier stainless steel through the use of exceptionally high conductivity copper alloy for its construction.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Magnetic-Field Diffusion Effects in Beam Position Monitors I: Theory

Beam position monitors (BPMs) provide time-resolved measurements of the current and centroid position of high-current electron beams in linear induction accelerators (LIAs). One of the types of detectors used in BPMs is the B-dot loop, which generates a signal from the EMF due to the time varying magnetic flux through the loop. If some of the boundaries of the loop are composed of thick metal walls with finite conductivity, the resulting signal must be corrected for the magnetic field diffusion into the metal. The theoretically predicted flux due to diffusion is in remarkable agreement with experimental measurements

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2016

High-Voltage Breakdown Penalties for the Beam-Breakup Instability

The strength of the dangerous beam breakup (BBU) instability in linear induction accelerators (LIAs) is determined by the transverse coupling impedance Z ⊥ of the induction cell cavity. For accelerating gap width w less than the beam pipe radius b, the transverse impedance is theoretically proportional to w/b, favoring narrow gaps to suppress BBU. On the other hand, cells with narrow gaps cannot support high accelerating gradients, because of electrical breakdown and shorting of the gap. Thus, there is an engineering trade-off between BBU growth and accelerating gradient, which must be considered for next generation LIAs now being designed. In this article this tradeoff is explored, using a simple pillbox cavity as an illustrative example. For this model, widening the gap to reduce the probability of breakdown increases BBU growth, unless higher magnetic focusing fields are used to further suppress the instability.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Beam Profile Measurements at the DARHT II Accelerator Exit

Measurements of the beam profile at the exit of the DARHT II accelerator have been made. The 1.65-kA, 17-MeV DARHT-II linear induction accelerator [1] is unique in that its beam pulse has a long, 1.6-ns flattop during which the kinetic energy varies by less than ±2%. Four short pulses are selected out of this long pulse in the downstream transport [2], and these are converted to bremsstrahlung for multi-pulse flash radiography of high explosive driven hydrodynamic experiments. The objective of the measurements was to demonstrate the capability to make these measurements with a long beam pulse of high intensity. Many observations can be made on the basis of these measurements. These are described herein.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Prospects for Machine Learning and Pulse Shaping on the Scorpius Accelerator [Poster]

The Advanced Sources and Detectors (ASD) project aims to build Scorpius, a multi pulse linear induction accelerator capable of delivering a 1.4 kA electron beam at energies up to 24 MeV. One of the primary advancements of Scorpius is the use of solid state pulsed power (SSPP) to provide flexibility in pulse shaping by independently triggering 45 individual stages stacked in each of 984 line replaceable units (LRU), with 168 LRUs dedicated to the injector. By leveraging circuit modeling of each LRU stage, a machine learning model of the SSPP will be developed to allow for optimization of the pulse shape, including pulse flattening and reflection mitigation. Particle-in-cell simulations of Scorpius have, for example, demonstrated that reducing reflections during multi-pulse operation mitigates beam spill by preventing the production of off-energy electrons between pulses, thereby abating stimulated ion desorption from the wall and beam charge neutralization. This machine learning model will be validated and tuned with experimental data collected from the Scorpius injector and Integrated Test Stand

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Transportation of high-current ion and electron beams in the accelerator drift gap in the presence of an additional electron background

The dynamics of a high-current ion beam propagating in the drift gap of a linear induction accelerator with collective focusing is studied using 3D numerical simulations in the framework of the full system of the Vlasov–Maxwell equations (code KARAT). The ion beam is neutralized by a comoving electron beam in the current density and, partially, in space charge, since the velocities of electrons and ions differ substantially. The dynamics of the high-current ion beam is investigated for different versions of additional neutralization of its space charge. It is established that, for a given configuration of the magnetic field and in the presence of a specially programmed injection of additional electrons from the boundary opposite to the ion injection boundary, the angular divergence of the ion beam almost vanishes, whereas the current of the ion beam at the exit from the accelerator drift gap changes insignificantly and the beam remains almost monoenergetic.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Current-Pulse Excitation of Beam Breakup in Scorpius

Perhaps the most dangerous instability for electron linear induction accelerators (LIA) is the beam breakup (BBU) instability. For flash-radiography LIAs like DARHT or Scorpius it is particularly troublesome, because low-level high-frequency BBU motion can blur the source spot. Theoretically, the number of e-foldings Γ of exponential BBU growth in an LIA is linearly proportional to beam current I, number of accelerating cells N, and transverse coupling impedance Z ⊥ , and inversely proportional to the strength of magnetic focusing B.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Scorpius Beam Physics Overview and a Few Remaining Concerns [Slides]

With so many new faces on board, I thought to take the opportunity to review some of the many beam physics issues that might cause problems after Scorpius is built and accelerating electron beams. Mitigation measures for all of these have been incorporated in the Scorpius design, wherever possible. In this talk, I’ll quickly review the physics issues that I feel are most problematic for Scorpius, based on my own experience, and that documented by other workers in the field of linear induction accelerators.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Re-Analysis of DARHT Axis 2 S4 Magnet Sweep Measurements

The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility provides flash radiography capabilities using two electron Linear Induction Accelerators (LIA’s). Understanding fundamental properties of the electron beams is essential to optimizing spot size and dose for radiography. This work describes distribution measurements of a single-kicked electron beam (16.5MeV, 1.7kA, 60ns) at a location downstream at imaging station C on DARHT Axis 2. The beam at station C is focused by the S4 solenoid located upstream. The beam distribution is measured by imaging optical transition radiation (OTR) from electrons striking a 51-µm thick titanium foil. This data and analysis were originally published by Ekdahl. The results here are a re-analysis of the asymmetric halo emittance contribution as compared to the emittance resulting from the FWHM of the distribution. This is accomplished using xtr2 fits to the data which include non-linear magnetic field effects in S4. Also examined are the calculated S4 spherical aberration contributions to the emittance using xtr.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Design and implementation of a Thomson parabola for fluence dependent energy-loss measurements at the Neutralized Drift Compression eXperiment

The interaction of ion beams with matter includes the investigation of the basic principles of ion stopping in heated materials. An unsolved question is the effect of different, especially higher, ion beam fluences on ion stopping in solid targets. This is relevant in applications such as in fusion sciences. To address this question, a Thomson parabola was built for the Neutralized Drift Compression eXperiment (NDCX-II) for ion energy-loss measurements at different ion beam fluences. The linear induction accelerator NDCX-II delivers 2 ns short, intense ion pulses, up to several tens of nC/pulse, or 1010-1011 ions, with a peak kinetic energy of ~1.1 MeV and a minimal spot size of 2 mm FWHM. For this particular accelerator, the energy determination with conventional beam diagnostics, for example, time of flight measurements, is imprecise due to the non-trivial longitudinal phase space of the beam. In contrast, a Thomson parabola is well suited to reliably determine the beam energy distribution. The Thomson parabola differentiates charged particles by energy and charge-to-mass ratio, through deflection of charged particles by electric and magnetic fields. During first proof-of-principle experiments, we achieved to reproduce the average initial helium beam energy as predicted by computer simulations with a deviation of only 1.4%25. Successful energy-loss measurements with 1 μm thick silicon nitride foils show the suitability of the accelerator for such experiments. The initial ion energy was determined during a primary measurement without a target, while a second measurement, incorporating the target, was used to determine the transmitted energy. The energy-loss was then determined as the difference between the two energies.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Fidelity of hot-cathode injector simulations

It is presently planned to use a hot-cathode injector for the new multi-pulse Scorpius linear induction accelerator (LIA). Design of this multi-pulse hot-cathode diode at LLNL might use the Trak gun-design code. This code has been used extensively for simulations of the DARHT-II long-pulse hotcathode diode. Comparison of Trak simulations with PIC code simulations and experimental data have been in excellent agreement, over a broad range of beam energy, from nonrelativistic to fully relativistic. This is largely due to the hot dispenser cathode physics, which ensures that an adequate source of electrons is available at any applied voltage, so long as the cathode is at operating temperature. This fact, and the agreement of Trak with experimental data and PIC simulations, provides confidence in the ability of Trak to accurately predict the diode current resulting from an applied voltage waveform for a Scorpius pulse format.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Scorpius and The Integrated Test Stand [Slides]

Scorpius will provide (DARHT scale) flash-radiography of dynamic nuclear material. DARHT radiographs non-nuclear (surrogate) materials at a cadence of 8 to 10 hydrodynamic shots per year. Scorpius will radiograph nuclear material at an initial cadence of about 2 to 3 subcritical shots per year in a more challenging environment. Both machines are Linear Induction Accelerators (LIAs) and generate X-rays with high-current, relativistic electron beams. Their use is termed Flash-Radiography.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
DOE OSTI2020

DARHT Axis 1 Time-Resolved Injector Energy Measurement

The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility provides flash radiography capabilities using electron Linear Induction Accelerators (LIA’s). The strict requirements for flash radiography require a detailed understanding of the LIA’s performance, including precision measurements of the injected electron beam energy. The DARHT Axis 1 injector of produces a 3-4 MeV, 1-2 kA, 80-ns-FWHM electron beam. Injector capacitive monitors (EVACSUM) are summed to give the injector beam energy. Calibration of EVACSUM was last done in 1999 and is needed. In addition, the flatness of the injector drive voltage is controlled by a peaking capacitor in a Blumlien that is charged by the prime power tank. Time resolved measurements are used to optimize the value of this capacitor.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗
DOE OSTI2020

DARHT Axis 1 Performance Results with and without a Blumlein Charge Unit

The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility provides flash radiography capabilities using two electron Linear Induction Accelerators (LIA’s). Axis 1 of DARHT produces a 20- MeV, 2-kA, 80-ns-FWHM electron beam. As DARHT Axis 1 enters its twentieth year of operation, the probability of Blumlein Charge Unit (BCU) failure has increased and the risk of a failure on the day of an explosive experiment has become more likely. Replacement time for a BCU is four to six hours. This report examines the radiographic and beam transport effect of operating the accelerator with a missing or reduced charge voltage BCU. The results are compared with normal, full machine operation. A prescription for alternate operation with missing or reduced charge voltage on BCU22 is given.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗
DOE OSTI2020

Optimization of DARHT Axis 1 Injector Voltage

The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility provides flash radiography capabilities using two electron Linear Induction Accelerators (LIA’s). Axis-1 of DARHT produces a 20- MeV, 2-kA, 80-ns-FWHM electron beam. The strict requirements for flash radiography require a detailed understanding of the LIA’s performance, including precision measurements of the injector electron beam energy. The technique for time resolved measurement of the electron beam energy using electron Permanent Magnet Spectrometer (ePMSpec) has been developed. The electron energy then is used to infer the voltage produced by the injector pulsed power. The injector pulsed power of DARHT I consists of a 1.5-MV, glycol-insulated Blumlein that is pulsecharged by a step-up transformer and switched by four, laser-triggered spark gaps. A series of increasing impedance transmission lines are used to transform the output voltage of the Blumlein to a maximum of 3.8MV at the diode. Figure 1a shows a graphic of the Axis-1 prime power tank, Blumlein and downstream transmission lines. The injector pulse power is designed to produce voltage on a velvet cathode located in the vacuum vessel. The specifications of the voltage-pulse flat-top over 60ns is +/-1%. A key element in the high-voltage circuit is the ethylene glycol Blumlein. The outer volume, adjacent to the laser triggered switches of the Blumlein, is a peaking capacitor. This is an independent volume that contains a mixture of ethylene glycol and water to make it an adjustable capacitor of 380 to 750 pF.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

2020 Review of Axis 2 rf

An intense relativistic electron beam can produce radiofrequency (rf) radiation in many ways. The DARHT II linear induction accelerator produces a 17 MeV, 1.65 kA beam. The dominant sources of rf at DARHT-II and the methods used to suppress this rf are well documented. This note will examine the observed rf over the past six years and its impact on the beam. The recorded waveforms for each hydro starting with 4011 from 10/29/14 are examined to identify the presence of rf. The hydros are chosen because they represent the optimal accelerator performance at any given time rather than tuning or beam studies.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Estimating Beam-Target Heating

At Los Alamos National Laboratory, two high-current linear induction accelerators (LIAs) are used to produce bremsstrahlung source spots for flash radiography of high-explosive driven hydrodynamic experiments at the Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility. Measurements of the electron-beam current density profile are valuable for understanding the beam dynamics in order to improve the quality of the radiography source spot. A technique commonly used at DARHT is to image the profile in Cerenkov or Optical Transition Radiation (OTR) light created by the beam striking a thin target inserted into the beam line. Target materials include aluminized dielectrics and titanium foils for OTR, and fused silica wafers for Cerenkov radiation. A practical complication with this technique is heating of the target by the electron beam. If the beam density is too great, the target can be destroyed. Moreover, even if the beam density is kept low enough to be nondestructive, the beam can heat the target to a high enough temperature to desorb gas from the surface. In that case, direct impact ionization of the gas by beam electrons can partially neutralize the beam, causing it to over-focus, thereby spoiling the data, if not destroying the target. The purpose of this note is to review some of the fundamental physics of electron beam heating in order to provide some elementary guidance for design of these imaging experiments to avoid overheating the target. Some specific examples for materials that we often use for imaging targets and beam-target experiments are provided.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗