Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Precision Landing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2006

Automated On-board Terrain Analysis for Precision Landings

Advances in space robotics technology hinge to a large extent upon the development and deployment of sophisticated new vision-based methods for automated in-space mission operations and scientific survey. To this end, we have developed a new concept for automated terrain analysis that is based upon a generic image enhancement platform-multi-scale Retinex (MSR) and visual servo (VS) processing. This pre-conditioning with the MSR and the VS produces a "canonical" visual representation that is largely independent of lighting variations, and exposure errors. Enhanced imagery is then processed with a biologically inspired two-channel edge detection process, followed by a smoothness based criteria for image segmentation. Landing sites can be automatically determined by examining the results of the smoothness-based segmentation which shows those areas in the image that surpass a minimum degree of smoothness. Though the MSR has proven to be a very strong enhancement engine, the other elements of the approach, the VS, terrain map generation, and smoothness-based segmentation, are in early stages of development. Experimental results on data from the Mars Global Surveyor show that the imagery can be processed to automatically obtain smooth landing sites. In this paper, we describe the method used to obtain these landing sites, and also examine the smoothness criteria in terms of the imager and scene characteristics. Several examples of applying this method to simulated and real imagery are shown.

Rahman, Zia-ur↗
NASA NTRS2019

Aero Maneuvering Dynamics and Control for Precision Landing on Titan

We have developed and tested several dynamic models of the parafoil system descending in Titan’s atmosphere. These dynamic models include a progression from point mass models to rigid multibody models, including relative dynamics between canopy and payload. In these models, we have included wind models used for Titan simulation, and extrapolated wind gust models previously used for simulation in the Martian environment. We have also developed guidance and control techniques to for autonomous parafoil turning in the adverse wind environment. Finally, and in order to improve the controller performance by reducing the uncertainty to environmental factors, we have also developed ways to estimate the Titan environmental parameters, i.e. the atmospheric density, and the wind magnitude, during the descent. A more complete and realistic simulation is being developed, which uses JPL’s DSENDS Entry, Descent, and Landing Software framework.

Ermolli, Luca↗
NASA NTRS2022

Real-World Testing of LiDAR-Inertial Based Navigation and Mapping for Precision Landing

The fusion of LiDAR and inertial measurements duringspacecraft descent and landing can be used to estimate alander’s navigation state and map the terrain below. Together,these data products can be used to enable safe and preciselanding on celestial bodies for which a priori orbital reconnaissanceis insufficient for hazard detection and avoidance.Unlike camera images used in visual terrain relative navigation,LiDAR scans are insensitive to changes in illumination; as aresult, the technique can be used to land in poorly lit areas,or at times of day when the lighting conditions are incongruentwith existing orbital imagery. In this paper, we extend previouswork in which we introduced a factor graph based smoothingapproach for LiDAR-inertial navigation and mapping. Whereasthe algorithms were previously tested on simulated data, thispaper presents testing on real-world data. Data from theAutonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT)airplane flight tests in the Yucca Flats and Death Valley in2009 (FT3), the Morpheus vertical take off and landing flighttests at Kennedy Space Center in 2014 (FT6), and the landingof Perseverance and Ingenuity on Mars in 2021 (M2020) wereused to evaluate algorithm performance. In this paper, weextend our LiDAR-inertial technique to work with a variety ofranging technologies: single point laser altimetry (FT3), denseflash LiDAR (FT6), and six-beam radar (M2020). A thoroughperformance analysis for all three datasets is presented. Datasetpreparation, improvements in algorithm robustness, and outlierrejection, which were necessitated by the transition to realworlddata, are discussed.

Trawny, Nikolas↗
NASA NTRS2024

Safe and Precise Landing at Lunar Sites

The Artemis missions will land astronauts on the lunar surface to leverage the unmatched capabilities of human explorers. These landings will commence long-term exploration and utilization of the Moon by NASA, industry, and international partners for the benefit of all.

Tamra George↗
NASA NTRS2024

Safe and Precise Landing Integrated Capabilities Evolution (SPLICE) Imagery of Sensors

Collection of imagery of SPLICE hardware and software visualization. Descent Landing Computer ETU Open Frame Chassis (OFC). ETU pictures of the GSFC Hazard Detection Lidar during assembly. Prototype picture of the delivered Psionic Navigation Doppler Lidar, including testing with a three-dimensional mobile target. Visualization of a lunar lander simulation using the Dual Quaternion Guidance, demonstrating pointing of a mounted hazard lidar, and then diverting to a selected safe site.

Guidance Navigation and Control↗
NASA NTRS2005

A Reusable Design for Precision Lunar Landing Systems

The top-level architecture to accomplish NASA's Vision for Space Exploration is to use Lunar missions and systems not just as an end in themselves, but also as testbeds for the more ambitious goals of Human Mars Exploration (HME). This approach means that Lunar missions and systems are most likely going to be targeted for (Lunar) polar missions, and also for long-duration (months) surface stays. This overacting theme creates basic top-level requirements for any next-generation lander system: 1) Long duration stays: a) Multiple landers in close proximity; b) Pinpoint landings for "surface rendezvous"; c) Autonomous landing of pre-positioned assets; and d) Autonomous Hazard Detection and Avoidance. 2) Polar and deep-crater landings (dark); 3) Common/extensible systems for Moon and Mars, crew and cargo. These requirements pose challenging technology and capability needs. Compare and contrast: 4) Apollo: a) 1 km landing accuracy; b) Lunar near-side (well imaged and direct-to-Earth com. possible); c) Lunar equatorial (landing trajectories offer best navigation support from Earth); d) Limited lighting conditions; e) Significant ground-in-the-loop operations; 5) Lunar Access: a) 10-100m landing precision; b) "Anywhere" access includes polar (potentially poor nav. support from Earth) and far side (poor gravity and imaging; no direct-to-Earth com); c) "Anytime" access includes any lighting condition (including dark); d) Full autonomous landing capability; e) Extensible design for tele-operation or operator-in-the-loop; and f) Minimal ground support to reduce operations costs. The Lunar Access program objectives, therefore, are to: a) Develop a baseline Lunar Precision Landing System (PLS) design to enable pinpoint "anywhere, anytime" landings; b) landing precision 10m-100m; c) Any LAT, LON; and d) Any lighting condition; This paper will characterize basic features of the next generation Lunar landing system, including trajectory types, sensor suite options and a reference system architecture.

Fuhrman, Linda↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lidar-Based Safe Site Relative Navigation

There has been a renewed focus in exploration of the lunar surface and maximizing scientific potential of such missions is made possible in part by minimizing the time required to set up operations; that is, reducing transit time on the surface by increasing the landing precision with respect to the intended target. Established SPLICE project precision landing requirements necessitate a navigation filter architecture and underlying models developed specifically with these needs in mind. To date, test flights to characterize SPLICE GNC system performance have not provided a means to divert from the a priori selected landing site due to hazardous conditions. With the inclusion of a new sensor, the HDL, coupled with safe landing site selection algorithms, GNC can divert from the originally planned trajectory and navigate relative to the new targeted landing site. This work presents a novel hazard relative measurement model and covariance transformation methodology that enable the navigation system to inform a safe-site relative guidance profile to meet project precision landing goals.

Navigation↗