Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “working group”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5

Validation Methods for Fault-Tolerant avionics and control systems, working group meeting 1

The proceedings of the first working group meeting on validation methods for fault tolerant computer design are presented. The state of the art in fault tolerant computer validation was examined in order to provide a framework for future discussions concerning research issues for the validation of fault tolerant avionics and flight control systems. The development of positions concerning critical aspects of the validation process are given.

Source record↗

Taxonomy Working Group Final Report

The purpose of the Taxonomy Working Group was to develop a proposal for a common taxonomy to be used by all NASA projects in the classifying of nonconformances, anomalies, and problems. Specifically, the group developed a recommended list of data elements along with general suggestions for the development of a problem reporting system to better serve NASA's need for managing, reporting, and trending project aberrant events. The Group's recommendations are reported in this document.

Parsons, Vickie S.↗

Managing Current Earth Observation Needs through User-Driven Implementation of Upcoming Satellite Needs Working Group (SNWG) Solutions

Since 2016, the Satellite Needs Working Group (SNWG), an initiative of the U.S. Group on Earth Observations (USGEO), has surveyed federal agencies every two years to identify their satellite earth observation needs. For each expressed need, NASA-led assessment teams coordinate with responding agencies to devise remote sensing solutions that benefit multiple partners and span across a number of thematic areas including, but not limited to, Atmospheric Composition, Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems, Earth Surface and Interior, and Oceans and Cryosphere. Solutions can comprise existing or modified data products as well as the construction of new data products and technologies: since 2016, a multitude of SNWG activities have been theorized and developed, reaching a wide range of users in the science community. Due to an increase in survey responses in 2020 and to assure solution delivery to users within five years of budget appropriations, the SNWG Management Office was established to oversee the assessment of agency needs and the implementation and operations of solution development. The SNWG MO’s unique implementation strategy creates multiple touchpoints with agencies during solution development helping fulfill Earth Science to Action priorities (the 2024 NASA Earth Science Division strategic plan) and ensuring solutions are accessible, usable, and support decision-making for their intended audience. This presentation will outline the ways in which SNWG supports complementary goals of the Decadal Survey, with specific attention on the SNWG MO’s renewed user-centric implementation strategy for upcoming SNWG solutions.

Jenny Wood↗

2010 Chemical Working Group Status

The Steering Group for the Interagency Advanced Power Group (IAPG) held their business meeting on November 30-December 1st in McLean, Virginia. Status reports were presented from each of the IAPG's Working Groups. These charts contain a brief summary of the IAPG Chemical Working Group's activities during 2010 and its plans for 2011.

Reid, Concha M.↗

Latest Status of the CCSDS Optical Communications Working Group

International civil space agencies around the world are working together in the Interagency Operation Advisory Group (IOAG) and the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) to develop interoperability architectures and standards for space communications. Within CCSDS, there is a working group dedicated on developing recommendations and standards for optical communications. These standards include recommendations for the physical layer, coding and synchronization layer, and best practices for measuring and monitoring atmospheric conditions and operating optical links. The working group has developed standards for both Near Earth and deep space robotic and hum exploration missions. The standards generally address both free space links between spacecraft and free space links between spacecraft and ground. This paper will provide an overview and update on the set of standards the CCSDS Optical Communications Working Group has developed

Bernard L Edwards↗

Evaluation and recommendations for work group integration within the Materials and Processes Lab

The goal of this study was to evaluate and make recommendations for improving the level of integration of several work groups within the Materials and Processes Lab at the Marshall Space Flight Center. This evaluation has uncovered a variety of projects that could improve the efficiency and operation of the work groups as well as the overall integration of the system. In addition, this study provides the foundation for specification of a computer integrated manufacturing test bed environment in the Materials and Processes Lab.

Farrington, Phillip A.↗

The Goal of the IAU/IAG Joint Working Group on the Theory of Earth Rotation

In 2012 the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) and the International Astronomical Union (IAU) initiated a process to establish a Joint Working Group (JWG) on theory of Earth rotation with the purpose of promoting the development of improved theories of the Earth rotation which reach the accuracy required to meet the needs of the near future as recommended by, e.g. GGOS, the Global Geodetic Observing System of the IAG. The JWG was approved by both organizations in April 2013 with the chairs being the two authors of this paper. Its structure comprises three Sub Working Groups (SWGs) addressing Precession/Nutation, Polar Motion and UT1, the Numerical Solutions and Validation, respectively. The SWGs should work in parallel for the sake of efficiency, but should keep consistency as an overall goal. This paper offers a view of the objectives and scope of the JWG and reports about its initial activities and plans.

Ferrandiz, J. M.↗

Mini-Mission Operations Working Group September 28, 2021

Introduction presentation to the Earth Science Constellation Interim Mission Operations Working Group (MOWG) meeting planned as a virtual meeting on Sept 28, 2021.

Earth Science Constellation Mission Operations Wor↗

Providing Satellite-Assisted Particulate Matter (SAPM) Estimates for the Models, In situ, and Remote sensing of Aerosols (MIRA) Working Group

The Models, In situ, and Remote sensing of Aerosols (MIRA) Working Group is an international forum that promotes collaboration amongst researchers of these three atmospheric aerosol communities. MIRA currently consists of a collection of five interdisciplinary and independently funded Topic groups with focused goals and generally involve requests for additional scientific datasets. Participants of the MIRA Satellite-Assisted Particulate Matter (SAPM) Topic group study particulate matter with diameters smaller than 2.5 microns (PM2.5), because of its substantial role in air pollution and the resulting negative impacts on human health. SAPM seeks to provide intercomparisons of different methods and techniques for obtaining surface PM2.5 proxies using spaceborne passive and active remote sensors, aerosol models, and in situ observations. The ultimate motivation of SAPM is to provide greater PM2.5 coverage than in situ ground stations, which are limited in some areas of the contiguous United States and large regions throughout the globe. In this poster presentation, we provide an overview of the PM2.5 estimation techniques applied by current SAPM team members, as well as the strengths and limitations of each technique. These approaches include spaceborne lidar (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) only, combined spaceborne lidar (Cloud Aerosol Transport System) and a model (Goddard Earth Observing System), and using aerosol optical depth (AOD) from a spaceborne passive remote sensor (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) to explore city trends in AOD and relate those to city trends in PM2.5. Also in this poster presentation, we highlight results of our SAPM study of India, a country characterized by high levels of PM2.5 concentrations. We show the temporal and spatial variability of PM2.5 over India derived using various approaches and validation with ground-based in situ PM2.5 observations. The SAPM Topic group actively seeks additional collaborators, including those working with in situ aerosol measurements, and is interested in aerosol datasets to improve and/or validate the PM2.5 estimates.

Travis D Toth↗

UTM Data Working Group Demonstration 1: Final Report

This document summarizes activities defining and executing the first demonstration of the NASA-FAA Research Transition Team (RTT) Data Exchange and Information Architecture (DEIA) working group (DWG). The demonstration focused on testing the interactions between two key components in the future UAS Traffic Management (UTM) System through a collaborative and distributed simulation of key scenarios. The summary incorporates written feedback from each of the participants in the demonstration. In addition to reporting the activities, this report also provides some insight into future steps of this working group.

UAS Traffic Management↗

Developing Satellite-Assisted Particulate Matter (SAPM) Estimates over India for the MIRA Working Group

The Models, In Situ, and Remote Sensing of Aerosols (MIRA) Working Group is an international collective that encourages collaboration among researchers from these three atmospheric aerosol communities. MIRA currently comprises five interdisciplinary and independently funded Topic Groups, each with specific goals, and involves requests for additional scientific datasets. The Satellite-Assisted Particulate Matter (SAPM) Topic Group, as part of MIRA, focuses on studying particulate matter smaller than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) due to its significant contribution to air pollution and its harmful effects on human health. While the annual mean PM2.5 levels are typically low (~5-15 μg/m³) across most of the contiguous United States (CONUS), other countries experience much higher concentrations (e.g., India). SAPM aims to compare different methods and techniques for obtaining surface PM2.5 proxies using spaceborne passive and active remote sensors, aerosol models, and in situ measurements. Ultimately, SAPM aims to provide more extensive coverage of PM2.5 concentrations than what is currently available from in situ ground stations, which are limited in some parts of the CONUS and large regions worldwide. Current SAPM members are exploring PM2.5 estimation techniques using active sensors. This presentation offers an overview of these techniques and highlights the strengths and limitations of each approach. These techniques include 1) spaceborne lidar (CALIOP: Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) alone, and 2) a combination of spaceborne lidar (CATS: Cloud Aerosol Transport System) and a global aerosol transport model (GEOS: Goddard Earth Observing System). Additionally, we present a case study featuring our SAPM research in India, a country with high levels of PM2.5 concentrations (i.e., state-level annual means of ~100-200 μg/m³). Consistent spatial patterns in PM2.5 over India are found from the in situ data, CALIOP-based, and CATS/model-based methods, with the highest concentrations found in northern India near New Delhi. The gridded PM2.5 analysis yields high R values between in situ and CATS/model (~0.7) and between in situ and CALIOP nighttime (~0.9), as well as good agreement between CATS/model and CALIOP nighttime PM2.5 estimates (R = ~0.8 and slope = ~0.9). For current and future efforts, the SAPM Topic Group is actively seeking new collaborators, especially those working with in situ aerosol measurements, and is interested in acquiring additional aerosol datasets to improve and validate the PM2.5 proxies.

Travis D Toth↗

Models, In situ, and Remote sensing of Aerosols (MIRA): Formation of an International Working Group

There is a natural partitioning of scientific interest amongst three specialties of aerosol research: modeling, in situ measurements, and remote sensing. The community sees enhanced measurement capabilities when these groups interact, and this strengthens the overall scientific impact on climate and air quality. The Models, In situ, and Remote sensing of Aerosols (MIRA) working group connects members of the different aerosol communities through collaborative projects. What is MIRA? MIRA is forum that fosters international collaborations amongst the aerosol specialties. MIRA is also a collection of interdisciplinary projects with clear goals that are pursued by small working groups. Finally, MIRA projects are generally characterized by requests for additional scientific data (both observational and modeled). Why? The purpose of MIRA is to contextualize both observations and model results through the encouragement of holistic projects and collaborations. How does MIRA differ from other projects? MIRA focuses on interdisciplinarity to improve measurements and their utility, so MIRA complements the activities of other groups. For example, ensemble model runs of AeroCom could be used in a MIRA project with greater robustness than a similar effort that uses single-model analyses. We first present a description of MIRA and how your project can become a part of the MIRA community. This is followed by brief descriptions of some of the current MIRA projects, which include the Mapping of Aerosol lidar ratios for CALIPSO (MAC), the Tables of Aerosol Optics (TAO), and the Harmonization of aerosol Assimilation Models and Retrievals (HAMR). Finally, we discuss the immediate science goals and organization of MIRA.

Gregory Schuster↗

Summary of Working Group 7: Linear colliders

The contributions presented during the Working Group 7: Linear Colliders (WG7) sessions at the 2024 Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop are briefly summarized, as well as the discussions regarding a design initiative for a linear collider based on wakefield accelerator technology.

Advanced Accelerator Concepts↗

First meeting of the Working Group on the Shuttle Microwave Precipitation Radiometer (SMPR)

The working group agreed that the first (primary) objective should be the determination of methods for the accurate measurement of total rain water and total cloud water with passive microwave methods. There was no argument on the points concerning nonlinear relationships between T sub B and rain rate (R) over the range of important rain rates (half of oceanic rainfall occurs at rates greater than 15 mm h-1), such that variations in rain rate within a footprint lead to an incorrect measurement of the average rate for that footprint, and one cannot determine the characteristics of the sensed rain area. This is especially true near 18 GHz, where the dynamic range above 15 mm h-1 is very small because this frequency does not clearly fall in either a scattering regime or emissive regime at these wavelengths. It is also not clear whether very low frequency (emissive) techniques will be the best at measuring rain processes, or high frequency (scattering) techniques, where precipitation-size ice plays a major role in the signal attenuation. It is still not known what signal of rain is at certain rates on an observational basis because of the many different conditions that can exist within a single satellite observed footprint.

Source record↗

NASA MEVTV Program Working Group Meeting: Volcanism on Mars

The purpose of this working group meeting is to focus predominantly on volcanism on Mars, prior to considering the more complex issues of interactions between volcanism and tectonism or between volcanism and global or regional volatile evolution. It is also hoped that the topical areas of research identified will aid the planetary geology community in understanding volcanism on Mars and its relationship to other physical processes.

Source record↗

PM Science Working Group Meeting on Spacecraft Maneuvers

The EOS PM Science Working Group met on May 6, 1997, to examine the issue of spacecraft maneuvers. The meeting was held at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and was attended by the Team Leaders of all four instrument science teams with instruments on the PM-1 spacecraft, additional representatives from each of the four teams, the PM Project management, and random others. The meeting was chaired by the PM Project Scientist and open to all. The meeting was called in order to untangle some of the concerns raised over the past several months regarding whether or not the PM-1 spacecraft should undergo spacecraft maneuvers to allow the instruments to obtain deep-space views. Two of the Science Teams, those for the Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES), had strongly expressed the need for deep-space views in order to calibrate their instruments properly and conveniently. The other two teams, those for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) and the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU), and the Humidity Sounder for Brazil (HSB), had expressed concerns that the maneuvers involve risks to the instruments and undesired gaps in the data sets.

Parkinson, Claire L.↗

NSF/ESF Workshop on Smart Structures and Advanced Sensors, Santorini Island, Greece, June 26-28, 2005: Structural Actuation and Adaptation Working Group

This document is a result of discussions that took place during the workshop. It describes current state of research and development (R&D) in the areas of structural actuation and adaptation in the context of smart structures and advanced sensors (SS&AS), and provides an outlook to guide future R&D efforts to develop technologies needed to build SS&AS. The discussions took place among the members of the Structural Actuation and Adaptation Working Group, as well as in general sessions including all four working groups. Participants included members of academia, industry, and government from the US and Europe, and representatives from China, Japan, and Korea.

Figueroa, Fernando↗