SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Problem Solving”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2019

Overcoming the Challenges of Data Integration and Automation

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are gaining increased attention as a way to leverage the world's data to solve problems. Although AI and ML offer much potential, there are often misconceptions about the application of such techniques. This panel discussion includes speakers from airlines and the research community who will present machine learning approaches they have developed on a variety of aviation data including digital flight data, safety reporting data, and traffic flow data. They will explain the purpose of the application, the data used, and the lessons learned in the development and deployment of their solutions. The panel discussion will focus on common pitfalls in developing and AI solution, the dangers of the current hype around AI, tips for gaining value from a machine learning solution, how to determine whether a machine learning approach is appropriate for a problem, and more.

Matthews, Bryan L.↗

NASA NTRS2019

Artificial Intelligence in Aviation Safety Applications - Exploring Myths and Truths of AI and ML

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are gaining increased attention as ways to leverage the world's data to solve problems. Although AI and ML offer much potential, there are often misconceptions about the application of such techniques.Panel speakers will present machine learning approaches they have developed on a variety of aviation data, including digital flight data, safety reporting data, and voice communications data. They will discuss the purpose of the application, the data used, and the lessons learned in the development and deployment of their solutions. The panel will also discuss common pitfalls in developing an AI solution, the dangers of the current hype around AI, tips for gaining value from a ML solution, how to determine whether a ML approach is appropriate for a problem, and more.

Reeves, Scott (Capt.)↗

NASA NTRS2020

Multi Model Monte Carlo with Python (MXMCPy)

Multi Model Monte Carlo with Python (\mxmc {}) is a software package developed as a general capability for computing the statistics of outputs from an expensive, high-fidelity model by leveraging faster, low-fidelity models for speedup. Motivated by uncertainty propagation problems where classical Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is computationally intractable, various multi-model MC approaches have recently emerged that yield unbiased estimators with significantly reduced variance relative to MC for the same cost. These existing methods include multi-level Monte Carlo (MLMC), multi-fidelity Monte Carlo (MFMC), and approximate control variates (ACV). Given a fixed computational budget and a collection of models with varying cost/accuracy, each method seeks a sample allocation strategy across the models that results in an estimator with optimal variance reduction. \mxmc {} is a versatile tool that enables convenient access to many existing multi-model MC approaches within one modular and extensible package. With \mxmc {}, users can easily compare existing methods to determine the best choice for their particular problem, while developers have a basis for implementing and sharing new variance reduction approaches. This report introduces the \mxmc {} software, providing a summary of the problem-solving workflow for users as well as a brief overview of the code layout for developers.

Geoffrey F Bomarito↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Human Systems Integration Relationships Between Deep Space and Deepwater Exploration Challenges

NASA pursuit of human missions Beyond Earth Orbit (BEO) to the moon and eventually Mars will pose many new challenges. These missions are characterized by increased risks to human performance due to stress, fatigue, radiation exposure, and isolation. Fundamental changes in spaceflight operations will be required as well. A very critical part of future missions will be assisting the crew with problem-solving and contingency resolution using next-generation smart spacecraft systems. Human Systems Integration (HSI) must be included as part of the systems engineering process. Gateway1 will serve as part of the proving ground for maturing technology such as autonomous systems and space operations procedures to help meet moon mission goals and prepare humans for missions to Mars. For deep space missions, risk factors affecting humans such as mission duration, distance, and physiological/psychological effects, must be considered. A human is not a simple component but rather a system in a systems-of-systems application-a system influenced by cognitive and biological factors that are difficult to model/analyze. System complexity will demand an integrated approach that requires multiple viewpoints, including the understanding of the astronauts' capabilities and limitations to enhance safety, performance, and satisfaction on the interaction between all system users in a variety of environments to achieve acceptable mission goals and performance. HSI will play a vital role in the development of these future missions. This paper provides a discussion of HSI used at NASA and the critical role human factors engineering will play in the HSI process for future missions along with the challenges. Industries such as oil and gas (O&G) could benefit from the content of this paper to help improve the safety and operations of deepwater/oil and gas exploration activities. NASA engineering and human systems subject-matter expert personnel reviewed challenges reported in space-related environments for long space duration missions and identified similarities with the challenges encountered in deepwater exploration. The researchers noted the space industry's current solutions and proposed a system development view to solve future deepwater exploration challenges using HSI principles. This paper discusses the results of the review.

George Salazar↗

NASA NTRS2020

NASA GPU Hackathon Yields Significant Code Improvements

The NASA GPU Hackathon 2020 brought together application developers and computer experts to help get important NASA applications running effectively on graphics processing unit (GPU) nodes. Nine teams of application developers participated in this virtual event, a major impetus for teams to modernize codes of interest for NASA missions to CPU nodes containing GPU accelerators, with a focus on hands-on problem solving. The photo in Figure1 shows 30 of the more than50 participants. The HECC project and NVIDIA jointly organized the event, and HECC provided five Pleiades nodes each with 4 V100 GPUs for teams to use. The virtual event, which took place over four days from September 28–October 7, 2020, used Microsoft Teams and Slack as collaboration tools. Each team consisted of three to six members from NASA Centers and supporting organizations. The teams were paired with one to two mentors from industry, government, and academia. The experience levels of the teams ranged from being GPU novices to advanced CUDA programming experts. OpenACC and the emerging Kokkos API were used in addition to CUDA for GPU programming. During the event, which focused on accelerating AeroSciences and CFD applications, most teams achieved considerable performance improvements on both GPUs and CPUs. For example, a team with no GPU experience completed a first port of a time-critical loop to a GPU. Another team of expert CUDA programmers were able to restructure their algorithm, yielding a factor of five speed-up. And another team sped up some of their CUDA kernels by a factor of 20, which directly translated into their production code. This article highlights some of the many successes resulting from the event.

HECC↗

NASA NTRS2020

Evaluation Issues for a Flight Deck Interface; CAST SE-210 Output 2: Report 4 of 6

This report is part of a series of reports that addresses flight deck design and evaluation, written as a response to loss of control accidents. In particular, this activity is directed at failures in airplane state awareness, in which the pilot loses awareness of the airplane’s energy state or attitude and enters an upset condition. Another report in this series of reports speaks directly to flight deck evaluation methods and metrics for the types of attention and awareness issues that were revealed from the airplane state awareness events. In this report, we describe a wide range of flight deck evaluation issues tied to flight crew performance. The objectives are to establish a framework for thinking about how the flight deck interface should support the performance of the flight crew, and to aid the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in identifying relevant human performance issues during the evaluation/certification process. Issues are broken out into sections that cover physical ergonomics, design for usability, data integration and display content, attention and task management, flight crew problem solving, and flight crew teaming. For each issue, we recommend specific ways that the flight deck interface should support the flight crew. For each, we also identify existing 14 CFR Part 25 rules and guidance that are relevant to the issue. This allows the FAA to determine what current regulatory materials can support them in raising the issue with the applicant.

commercial aviation↗

NASA NTRS1993

Impasse-Driven Tutoring for Reactive Skill Acquisition

We are interested in developing effective performance-oriented training for the operation of systems that are used for monitor and control purposes. We have focused on one such system, the communications Link Monitor and Control (LMC) system used in NASA's Deep Space Network (DSN), which is a worldwide system for navigating, tracking and communicating with unmanned interplanetary spacecraft. The tasks in this domain are procedural in nature and require reactive, goal-oriented skills; we have previously described a cognitive model for problem solving that accounts for both novice and expert levels of behavior as well as how skill is acquired [Hill and Johnson, 1993]. Our cognitive modeling work in this task domain led us to make a number of predictions about tutoring that have influenced the design of the system described in this paper.

Johnson, W. Lewis↗

NASA NTRS2001

Narrow band emission from lithographically defined photonic bandgap structures in silicon: matching theory and experiment

The authors previously reported discovery of narrow, thermal emission bands from symmetrically patterned features etched into silicon wafers. In this paper, we report further results that show the measured absorption peaks for such patterned surfaces match theoretical calculations of the complete electrodynamic problem solved using the Transfer Matrix Method (TMM).

photonic↗

NASA NTRS1993

Mission Operations and Command Assurance: Automating an Operations TQM Task

Mission Operations and Command Assurance (MO&CA) is a Total Quality Management (TQM) task on JPL projects to instill quality into mission operations. The mission operations environment is inherently risky because each decision made is potentially mission critical. The flight operations environment generally requires operators to make rapid critical decisions and solve problems based on limited information, while closely following standard procedures. MO&CA's primary goal is to help improve the operational reliability and reduce risk of projects during flight. To achieve this goal, automation of the MO&CA task is required. MO&CA specifically embodies the TQM principle of continuous process improvement (CPI) in which processes are continually examined and analyzed for opportunities for improvement. The second way in which MO&CA implements CPI on JPL projects is on new projects or upgrades to existing projects.

mission↗

NASA NTRS1993

Mission Operations and Command Assurance: Flight Operations Quality Improvements

Mission Operations and Command Assurance (MO&CA) is a Total Quality Management (TQM) task on JPL projects to instill quality in flight mission operations. From a system engineering view, MO&CA facilitates communication and problem-solving among flight teams and provides continuous process improvement to reduce risk in mission operations by addressing human factors. The MO&CA task has evolved from participating as a member of the spacecraft team to an independent team reporting directly to project management and providing system level assurance. JPL flight projects have benefited significantly from MO&CA's effort to contain risk and prevent rather than rework errors. MO&CA's ability to provide direct transfer of knowledge allows new projects to benefit from previous and ongoing flight experience.

mission↗

NASA NTRS1993

Impasse-Driven Tutoring for Reactive Skill Acquisition

We introduce a new approach to intelligent tutoring in performance-oriented training environments based on a method called situated plan attribution. The aim of this method is to provide contextualized tutoring for procedural tasks requiring reactive, goal-oriented skills. We use the term plan attribution instead of plan recognition because it does not assume that the problem solver is consciously executing plan. We avoid some of the pitfalls of other popularly used methods, i.e., model tracing and procedure net grammars, by selectively using an expert cognitive model to generate advice after detecting a problem solving impasse. The tutor attributes a set of plans to the student based on a task description. Each action is evaluated with respect to: the student's attributed plans, its actual effects on the training device, and the contextualized goals associated with the plans.

Johnson, W. Lewis↗

NASA NTRS1993

Toward an Embedded Training Tool for Deep Space Network Operations

There are three issues to consider when building an embedded training system for a task domain involving the operation of complex equipment: (1) how skill is acquired in the task domain; (2) how the training system should be designed to assist in the acquisition of the skill, and more specifically, how an intelligent tutor could aid in learning; and (3) whether it is feasible to incorporate the resulting training system into the operational environment. This paper describes how these issues have been addressed in a prototype training system that was developed for operations in NASA's Deep Space Network (DSN). The first two issues were addressed by building an executable cognitive model of problem solving and skill acquisition of the task domain and then using the model to design an intelligent tutor.

Johnson, W. Lewis↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Advocacy and Allyship by Men for Women in Engineering-Related Fields at the College Level

Diversity enables better and more creative problem solving, with greater financial impact on organizations, according to multiple studies in the past 10 years. One long-standing limitation on diversity in technology fields is the persistently-low representation of females. This is often seen in the collegiate environment more than in the professional world, and greater efforts need to be made in college classrooms and labs to address it. Most succinctly, more men need to directly involve themselves as advocates for and allies of women. This panel engages with professionals of both binary gender identities who currently ally and advocate for women in engineering, computing, and technology fields. The goals of the panel are to identify common reasons why men should advocate for women, create support around the simple actions that can be taken in advocacy, and encourage greater allyship for women in the academic world and beyond. The panelists include both men and women from across multiple intersectional identities. The questions include (1) for what reasons are you an ally or advocate for women in engineering-related fields, (2) what experiences have you had in which you have had to take immediate action as an advocate or ally, (3) what do you recommend for easy-to-implement actions to advocate, and (4) how can advocates and allies help implement change at their own institutions. For the paper, each panelist would be asked these questions and their answers would be provided unedited, followed by a summary discussion of actionable items. For the panel presentation session, each panelist will have the opportunity to highlight aspects of their answers bring life to their thoughts to each question and together with other members of the panel can build for an in-depth discussion.

Brian Kirkmeyer↗

NASA NTRS2022

4. Parallels in Communication and Navigation Technology and Natural Phenomenon

This chapter represents an introspective search for hidden connections between technology and nature and inadvertent influence on biomimicry – especially as it pertains to links to electromagnetics in navigation and communication systems. Several devices, phenomena, and approaches to problem solving are considered and an attempt is made to identify linkages between experiences, observables and the way we think about and create new technology.

Advanced Air Mobility↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Higher-Order Approximations for Stabilizing Zero-Energy Modes in Peridynamics Crystal Plasticity Models with Large Horizon Interactions

The non-ordinary state-based peridynamics theory combines non-local dynamic techniques with a desirable correspondence material principle, allowing for the use of continuum mechanics constitutive models. Such an approach presents a unique capability for solving problems involving discontinuities (e.g., strain localization, fracture, and fragmentation). However, the correspondence-based peridynamics models often suffer from zero-energy mode instabilities in numerical implementation, primarily due to the approximations of the non-local deformation gradient tensor. This paper focuses on a computational scheme for eliminating the zero-energy mode oscillations using a choice of influence functions that improve the truncation error in a higher-order Taylor series expansion of the deformation gradient. The novelty here is a tensor-based derivation of the linear constraint equations, which can be used to systematically identify the particle interaction weight functions for various user-specified horizon radii. In this paper, the proposed higher-order stabilization scheme is demonstrated for multi-dimensional examples involving polycrystalline and composite microstructures, along with comparisons against conventional finite element methods. The proposed stabilization scheme is shown to be highly effective in suppressing the spurious zero-energy mode oscillations in all numerical examples while enabling efficient simulations of strain localizations across material interfaces.

Non-Ordinary State-Based Peridynamics↗

NASA NTRS2021

NASA in Silicon Valley

Whether looking back only a few years or more than a century, our world has been changing. Communication networks are more widespread and interconnected than at any other time in human history. Computing power that was only imagined a generation ago is now widely available and can fit in the palm of a hand. The miniaturization of the integrated circuit has brought us close to the limit of what is possible with silicon as we explore new possibilities in the quantum realm. For over 80 years, NASA’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley has held a special place amidst such change. With change, there also is continuity. Since 1939, Ames contributions have fundamentally shaped fields of study related to aeronautics and space. The ingenuity and problem-solving capabilities of personnel at Ames have affected all our lives in numerous ways, from everyday air travel to how we envision the possibility of life on other worlds. This publication is a mere hint at the rich history of Ames, told primarily through images that capture some of the recurring threads that have intertwined over that time. A bibliography points the reader to more detailed histories of Ames published over the years. They are excellent resources and, like all historical work, unavoidably incomplete. Our standing invitation in the present is to preserve what we can to help us understand where we are and how we arrived.

History↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Towards a flexible framework for community-wide ensemble forecasting tailored for major space environment impacts

To build continuously improving space weather predictive capabilities based on science and enable assessments and rapid implementations of advances in research into source-to-impact modelling systems we need: to assemble parts of the puzzle by solving problems focused on specific physical domains; to identify essential space environment quantities (ESEQs) passed between domains and linked to impacts; evaluate modeling capabilities for each ESEQ; connect all validated solutions from space weather origins on the sun to impacts on humans and critical infrastructure; to design displays for ensemble predictions tailored for major space weather user groups; to build a collaborative environment for efficient sharing of information and capabilities (models/data/expertise) and collaborative development. The presentation will overview existing community-wide space weather forecasting frameworks and research-to-operations pipelines and discuss opportunities to build a collaborative plug-and-play platform for interconnecting predictive capabilities developed under different space weather programs.

space weather↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Towards A Flexible Framework for Community-Wide Ensemble Forecasting Tailored for Major Space Environment Impacts

space weather↗