Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Mars Ascent Vehicle”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6

Residual Thrust in a Solid Rocket Motor: A Model Applied to the Mars Ascent Vehicle

A model for solid rocket motor residual thrust is built from the concept that hot nozzle phenolic or carbon materials provide a radiating source of heat flux to the insulation, leading to continued off-gassing by pyrolysis. This model is 1. Fitted to flight datasets and scaled to the Mars Ascent Vehicle second stage motor (MAV SRM2), and 2. Derived with MAV SRM2 design and material estimates. The two methods show a potential range of modeling uncertainty for use by mission analysts. Further loss methods that could reduce the maximum residual impulse are identified but left to further work to evaluate.

Solid rocket motors↗

Residual Thrust in a Solid Rocket Motor: A Model Applied to the Mars Ascent Vehicle

A model for solid rocket motor residual thrust is built from the concept that hot nozzle phenolic or carbon materials provide a radiating source of heat flux to the insulation, leading to continued off-gassing by pyrolysis. This model is 1. Fitted to flight datasets and scaled to the Mars Ascent Vehicle second stage motor (MAV SRM2), and 2. Derived with MAV SRM2 design and material estimates. The two methods show a potential range of modeling uncertainty for use by mission analysts. Further loss methods that could reduce the maximum residual impulse are identified but left to further work to evaluate.

Solid rocket motors↗

A Miniature Mars Ascent Vehicle

Launch of payloads from the surface of the Mars is a central element in any Sample Return program, and represents one of the most important objectives of NASA planetary science and Human Exploration and Development of Space (HEDS) programs. Analysis of these samples in the sophisticated laboratories of Earth will give vastly more scientific as well as HEDS-relevant engineering and space-medicine knowledge of those bodies than can be performed from any feasible near-term miniaturized instruments. What is proposed here is a launch system with no moving parts of any kind: no gyroscope, no accelerometers, no control surfaces, and no thrust vector control.

B. H. Wilcox↗

Modeling of Gaseous Oxygen Liquefaction Inside Mars Ascent Vehicle Propellant Tank

The In-Situ production of propellants for Mars missions has been considered to utilize the Carbon dioxide (CO2) in Mars atmosphere to produce Oxygen using a high temperature solid oxide electrolyzer. The oxygen then needs to be cooled, liquefied, and stored to be available for propulsion and other end users. The storage period could be up to two years either in the actual Mars ascent propulsion tanks or in a separate tank. Recent investigations have demonstrated the feasibility of both achieving zero-boil-off and controlling the pressure of oxygen within a tank using high efficiency cryocoolers. A representative configuration of tube on tank liquefaction using cryocooler is shown in Fig. 1.

Cryogenic fluids↗

An ISRU Propellant Production System to Fully Fuel a Mars Ascent Vehicle

In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) will enable the long term presence of humans beyond low earth orbit. Since 2009, oxygen production from the Mars atmosphere has been baselined as an enabling technology for Mars human exploration by NASA. However, using water from the Martian regolith in addition to the atmospheric CO2 would enable the production of both liquid Methane and liquid Oxygen, thus fully fueling a Mars return vehicle. A case study was performed to show how ISRU can support NASA's Evolvable Mars Campaign (EMC) using methane and oxygen production from Mars resources. A model was built and used to generate mass and power estimates of an end-to-end ISRU system including excavation and extraction water from Mars regolith, processing the Mars atmosphere, and liquefying the propellants. Even using the lowest yield regolith, a full ISRU system would weigh 1.7 mT while eliminating the need to transport 30 mT of ascent propellants from earth.

Mars Surface↗

Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories II (POST2) Surrogate Models for Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) Performance Assessment

The primary purpose of the multiPOST tool is to enable the execution of much larger sets of vehicle cases to allow for broader trade space exploration. However, this exploration is not achieved solely with the increased case throughput. The multiPOST tool is applied to carry out a Design of Experiments (DOE), which is a set of cases that have been structured to capture a maximum amount of information about the design space with minimal computational effort. The results of the DOE are then used to fit a surrogate model, ultimately enabling parametric design space exploration. The approach used for the MAV study includes both DOE and surrogate modeling. First, the primary design considerations for the vehicle were used to develop the variables and ranges for the multiPOST DOE. The final set of DOE variables were carefully selected in order to capture the desired vehicle trades and take into account any special considerations for surrogate modeling. Next, the DOE sets were executed through multiPOST. Following successful completion of the DOE cases, a manual verification trial was performed. The trial involved randomly selecting cases from the DOE set and running them by hand. The results from the human analyst's run and multiPOST were then compared to ensure that the automated runs were being executed properly. Completion of the verification trials was then followed by surrogate model fitting. After fits to the multiPOST data were successfully created, the surrogate models were used as a stand-in for POST2 to carry out the desired MAV trades. Using the surrogate models in lieu of POST2 allowed for visualization of vehicle sensitivities to the input variables as well as rapid evaluation of vehicle performance. Although the models introduce some error into the output of the trade study, they were very effective at identifying areas of interest within the trade space for further refinement by human analysts. The next section will cover all of the ground rules and assumptions associated with DOE setup and multiPOST execution. Section 3.1 gives the final DOE variables and ranges, while section 3.2 addresses the POST2 specific assumptions. The results of the verification trials are given in section 4. Section 5 gives the surrogate model fitting results, including the goodness-of-fit metrics for each fit. Finally, the MAV specific results are discussed in section 6.

Zwack, M. R.↗